PDA

View Full Version : "Democrat" - "Republican"


Stick
10-07-2010, 02:45 PM
Just when has our current Commander and Chief talked to anyone or any media when the "Democrats do +his" or the Republicans did "+hat" not entered the talk.
When is it going to be "America needs to do this and it's my job to lead this country to the great nation it is."
Not once in this entire administrations reign has anyone heard Mr. Obama say anything that didn't take a jab at what we are and what America stands for.
The Chinese look at America and brag how much America owes them and Mr. Obama only tells the world that it is the Republicans fault that America is what it is today and just once I'ld like him to praise what this country has done for the world. Instead he tells the world that it's the Democrats and not the Americans that can and will lead all nations into what they can be. The nations of the world need to know that it's a "Government by the people" and not a "Government by the Democrats" that can lead all nations into liberty.
When I go and vote next month I'll pull the lever on whatever candidate that defines America and not a viewpoint "Republican" or "Democrat."
BTW, Incumbent? Bye!!!!"
Mr. Obama just might be the greatest thing that ever happened to the
If it weren't for buspar I wouldn't be able to view one "Evening News" and even with buspar I'm still screaming at the tube after "and that's our evening news for tonight. Goodbye."

reconeil
10-07-2010, 05:40 PM
Generally speaking, I believe that all sensible & patriotic Americans should vote as I always have voted,...and/or basically voting for whom would make BEST Commander-In-Chief & Administration FOR The U.S. Military.

After all, NO OTHERS (especially NOT career-politicos & political hacks) than U.S. Military ARE or HAVE EVER BEEN THE GUARANTORS of Americans' cherished (since dearly paid for in blood, sweat & tears): "Life, Liberty & Pursuit of Happiness". To quote DAV: "Freedom Is Not Free".

In point of fact, after just turning 21 & being Honorably Discharged from Army & thus finally able to vote,...my very first vote was cast for President Eisenhower & U.S. Military Respecting & Supportive Team. Have voted accordingly ever since.

Regardless & on a personal note about misguided Veterans & others rarely ever voting as sensibly or WHAT BEST for America & America's Freedom & Liberty GUARANTORS (re. U.S. Military),...I say: "Wake up all you politically duped by: 'Pie-in-the-sky' bull, Suckers". "We Americans simply cannot afford same arrogant, lordly & not trustworthy: 'PROGRESSIVE' types like Carter, Clinton or Obama anymore".

We quite differently need leaders whom can actually be trusted & believed,...INSTEAD.

Besides: "We The (Schnook$)" or U.S. Taxpayers are running out of both TIME & MONEY.
No longer can we afford being led by Incompetent: "Share The Wealth" Dictatorial Clowns.

Don't We deserve better? Hell,...we most certainly Pay, Pay, & Pay VERY WELL for better.

Neil

darrels joy
10-07-2010, 05:46 PM
The good news is that many more candidates, at all levels, have served in the military. :cool:

reconeil
10-10-2010, 01:44 PM
In general I think it's great having more Veteran candidates.
After all, most Veterans are no doubt more Honorable & Trustworthy than those never having served.

Besides, Veterans already having sworn to uphold The U.S. Constitution (to the death if need be) instead of remaining safe at home,...should count for something?

Still, both Dick ("I Served in Vietnam" BULL) Blumenthal & "Ramboo JFKerry" whom APPLIED FOR(???) for & received 3 Purple Hearts & 1 Silver Star after only a 3 months Tour of Duty in Vietnam, sure gives one pause about trusting ANY such Veteran candidates smitten by that Lordly & Duplicitously Mind Scrambling Political Bug.

Therefore, I personally believe that ALL CANDIDATES (civilian & veteran alike) should have to pass a polygraph test on campaign promises, before being permitted on ANY ballot line.
It's obvious that our longtime & current Honor System NO LONGER WORKS.

Regardless, NO Americans should wait 2 years as with Pelosi, 4 years as with Obama, or 6 years as with Reid...to find out having been ROYALLY SUCKERED by obvious Lordly Progressives/Democrats and/or Socialists/Marxists!!!

"UN-Connected" Con-Artists, Common Thieves or NON-Oathtaking Hucksters NEVER get to skate 2,4, or 6 years for transgressions or frauds,...as most always Officialdom Thieves or Official Tax Evaders typically stealing from Public Troth often do.

Just why is that, Fellow Victims?
How come Oathtaking Public Thieves or Officialdom's Low-Lifes aren't penalized at least TWICE as much???

Neil