|
The unfortunate part is that the major portion of the investigation didn't start until almost a month after the actual murder. This gave Peterson time to cover most of his bases. There is also an indication Peterson tried to lose the police surveillance.
Though fairly thorough, there are always things to be forgotten. Mark Twain said, "If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember what you said." Peterson did well no doubt. |
?O.K. Gents - good points - one and all!"
"BUT" - as far as the beard and hair dying, it must be noted that the media at that time was hounding Peterson day and night! He colored his hair and took off to his parent's home in San Diego, in my opinion; to get some peace from said media! Secondly, as far as allegations that he (Peterson) was heading for Mexico to escape justice, it must be duly noted that San Diego too, is hundreds of miles south of Modesto in the San Joaquin Valley, of Central California! Peterson's parents were living in San Diego, and I would believe that, at that point in time, Peterson was looking for a friendly face away from the gore-hungry media and the blood-thirsty mobs! If Peterson were really on the lamb, he would not have stopped in San Diego, so close to the International Border - he would have gone the extra few miles. And the money that he had along with him, would not have lasted long in Mexico - what then?! "We do have an extradition treaty with Mexico you know!!" As far as Amber Frye, granted, Peterson was a scumbag who was playing around with anything with a skirt. This alone don't make him a murderer! And in all honesty, and not meant as an insult of any kind, how many of you would have committed so horrendous a crime for the likes of that Frye gal? (Come on now, give me a break!!) Next, many a brilliant murderer has attempted to cover his ass after the fact, and even the most intelligent of felons have failed to catch some minute evidence of the crime! Yet, the media and legal system would have us all believe that a man who so cleverly and absolutely removed all forensic evidence from a crime scene, would be stupid enough to dump his wife's body right were he fishes, and not a few miles further, out in the open sea. A sea that quickly washes away all signs and evidence? "Do I personally think that he did it?" - I don't know, but this case is purely circumstantial (opinion) and I was surprised that, on the basis of the lack of evidence, he was convicted, even with the legal musical chairs, and the guilty mindset that existed from square # 1!? Maybe Peterson should have changed his name to OJ and fell back upon past glories, as only a damned fool would believe that justice treats all humanity in the same fashion!? That "Dear Old Bitch (Justice)" is not only blind, she is often prostituted!! "Hell, and you thought that Judas alone sold out for a hand full of silver!!" Those who eternally hunger for fame and fortune do so every day. But what the heck, Hell ain't half full, and I truly believe that when these cretins, regardless of earthly position, arrive beyond the River Styx, they will bellow out like wounded banshees, and only then learn the real meaning of truth! (Ooops!) It is further my opinion that those who pre-judge, or put their foots in their mouths in a fashion that could mean big legal, ego, or personal troubles, ?WILL?, more times than not, delve out a vested form of judgment in order to close a book and cover their own asses, even at the expense of someone else?s life! Again, I know not for sure if Peterson is innocent or guilty, but I do feel that the lynch-mob mentality has come into play here! And as a Deputy Sheriff once told me - "The Jails are loaded with the innocent" - for that mater, ?SO ARE THE MORGUES!? In a nation that murders unborn children by the hundreds of thousands, do you not find it strange that maybe some of the same "Killers By Choice? are the first to buy a rope, even in a case where circumstantial evidence could get someone hung? So what happens down the line (if Peterson is ever found innocent) - an apology or flowers at his grave perhaps!? Or will we, like some powers that be, merely shrug it off like they have in the past with the "MK Ultra and other systemic (experimantation) Debacles", and in the process, gleefully accept provable perjury by the highly placed as law? After all, we must be a team players, never make waves, and always pass off our fatal transgressions as being socially acceptable at the time (a Third Reich Mentality). ? Or will we all just go back to sleep, and then carry on as if nothing has happened, forever trapped within a mass-created and totally acceptable trance?? "Hell, we've got the media and the system, we have no need of drugs or booze!!" :t: VERITAS & RIP |
Heith, HC
Keith, your kidding, right?
So every fisherman that fishes there is a killer? Or just the ones you don't like? Fishing don't make a killer. He was driving in the same area, he must have did it? Thats not evidence, thats coincidence, at best. Those people convicted him cause he is a jerk and cheeted on his pregnant wife. Thats not how the system works. HC, I don't useually agree with you, but you got me hear, at least about 80% . If this conviction stands the whole system is in for a big shock. Im glade its in California, That wouldn't fly in Texas. Ron |
While I'm more on the side that Peterson is guilty, I have to beleive that the justice system let us all down. Hopefully, Peterson can get a new trial through an appeals. It was always my understanding that if a jury was hung, you called a mistrial, you didn't replace the jurors that didn't agree with the majority so that a verdict could be reached. On that alone, I hope a new trial is granted. I want this man convicted, but I want him convicted FAIRLY. If this conviction stands, we as a Nation are no better then governments of oppression we are fighting against with the lives our our servicemen and women.
|
This is what we get instead of news: bread and circuses
|
Ron,
It was Christmas Eve. If my memory serves me correctly, he was the only one to use that boat launch that day. That put only one person at the scene of the body dumping and the one person who had the motive. In my mind, that's pretty hard evidence.
I haven't read all the evidence presented at the trial but I'm sure the jury went through it very carefully. Keith |
In my mind they need to establish that Peterson was AT THE SCENE where the murders took place, AT THE TIME the murders took place.
They charged this man with murder BEFORE thay had any BODIES. I agree that he is guilty, but he was charged and convicted not on evidence, but conjecture. What ever happened to HABEAS CORPUS? This smacks of the Hitler bomb plot trials only not as fast. |
I think he is gulity and I am happy with the verdic..
thats all i am saying about this besides.... I was late for work waiting to see what the verdic was.. love ya tina |
Not only was he the only one to use the launch, but he didn't have the proper equipment to fish for sturgeon. He had freshwater fishing gear, drove over 90 miles to the launch and passed several freshwater fishing spots on the way. He was in a trashy area not known for sturgeon. A hydrologist connected the unborn childs washup to Petersons fishing spot.
For HC. There are far better ways to eliminate a wife than a brutal murder. Especially for likes of faye. He had to know he was going to be on the chopping block eventually. His stories and actions put him there. There is enough evidence to point to his guiltiness. The point to look more closely at is the lack of good "judgement" on the American judicial system! |
Guilty
I think most everyone in the country belive that Scott most likely did it. Thats not what Im talking about. The court system is whats the matter in this case. The whole thing just stunk, Saying he was the only one fishing that day is most likely not correct, and even if it is true that don't make him a killer, it makes him a good fieherman.
I go fishing a lot when there is no one else around, I go to the track and run every day and on the days when its cold and raining,(including Christmas Eve) Im the only one there, that don't make me a killer. Our court system is based on inocent until Proven guilty, not guilty if I don't like the way you act. I was on a jury that did that to a guy, (found him guilty with no evidence) I told them then that I didn't care, If they wanted to vote him guilty and they could live with themselfs, then hes guilty. I also called the guys lawyer after and told him what we had done. Lets say for one second that he didn't do it and he was just fishing, and now put yourself in his spot. After all no one knows if he did it or not, thats what the evidence is for. If you stopped by a convinence store and 5 mins latter it was robbed, It must have been you that did it, Give me some real evidence or don't go to trial. Ron |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.