Slowly but surely
 

Throw the bum out in 04
___________

Bush Job Approval Falls in Two U.S. Polls
Sat Sep 6, 4:37 PM ET



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites)'s job approval
rating dropped in two polls released on Saturday amid concern about the
economy and instability in Iraq (news - web sites).

Bush, who faces a re-election fight in just over a year, saw his rating
fell sharply from last month in a Zogby America poll of likely voters.
Forty-five percent gave Bush positive marks for job performance in the
new survey, down from 52 percent in August and the lowest since January
2001, the month he took office.

In a Time magazine/CNN poll of registered voters, the president's
approval slid to 52 percent. The same poll recorded 63 percent approval
for Bush back in May.

"The economy clearly is the chief concern," pollster John Zogby said,
noting that recent surveys found more people fearful of losing their
jobs within the next year.

A Labor Department (news - web sites) report Friday showed a weak labor
market as initial claims for unemployment aid rose unexpectedly, even as
other indicators showed the economy gaining strength.

Iraq, where U.S. soldiers face daily attacks amid rebuilding attempts,
has also hurt Bush's standing, Zogby said.

Bush is scheduled to address the nation Sunday night about Iraq and the
war on terrorism.

"There is growing concern and impatience about whether the war was worth
it," Zogby said.

The Time/CNN poll, however, said 72 percent of people surveyed thought
the United States had done a "good job" in Iraq since major fighting
ended, and 63 percent believed going to war with Iraq was the right
decision.

The poll found a split on whether the war was worth the toll in American
lives and other costs, with 49 percent saying yes and 43 percent saying no.

The Zogby poll of 1,013 people was conducted Sept. 3-5. The margin of
error was 3.2 percentage points. The Time/CNN poll was conducted Sept.
3-4 and surveyed 1,003 people. Its margin of error was 3.1 percentage
points.

Re: Slowly but surely
 

On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:04:10 +0200 (CEST), Tarapia Tapioco
<comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote this crap:

>Throw the bum out in 04
>___________
>
>Bush Job Approval Falls in Two U.S. Polls
>Sat Sep 6, 4:37 PM ET
>
>

2/3 Democrats still can't name one person running for president.


Hero@Horvath.net

Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!

Re: Slowly but surely
 

"Horvath" <Hero@Horvath.nosepamm.net> wrote in message
news:bjgfgq$csg$0@206.244.73.185...
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:04:10 +0200 (CEST), Tarapia Tapioco
> <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote this crap:
>
> >Throw the bum out in 04
> >___________
> >
> >Bush Job Approval Falls in Two U.S. Polls
> >Sat Sep 6, 4:37 PM ET
> >
> >
>
> 2/3 Democrats still can't name one person running for president.

I can name a few. But after 6 beers they do look much better.

Re: Slowly but surely
 

Horvath wrote:

> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:04:10 +0200 (CEST), Tarapia Tapioco
> <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote this crap:
>
> >Throw the bum out in 04
> >___________
> >
> >Bush Job Approval Falls in Two U.S. Polls
> >Sat Sep 6, 4:37 PM ET
> >
> >
>
> 2/3 Democrats still can't name one person running for president.
>
>
> Hero@Horvath.net
>
> Ave Imperator Bush!
> Bush Was Right! Four More Years!

Dont need to know any names, vote a straight democratic ticket. Anyone,
and I mean anyone but Bush in 04!!!


--

Re: Slowly but surely
 

In article
<cG9wdXA=.2928b8ac10b6305aba092e2dd45f8ff4@1063037 514.cotse.net>,
Pudding Tame <jellopud-no-spam@cotse.net> wrote:

> Horvath wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:04:10 +0200 (CEST), Tarapia Tapioco
> > <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote this crap:
> >
> > >Throw the bum out in 04
> > >___________
> > >
> > >Bush Job Approval Falls in Two U.S. Polls
> > >Sat Sep 6, 4:37 PM ET
> > >
> > >
> >
> > 2/3 Democrats still can't name one person running for president.
> >
> >
> > Hero@Horvath.net
> >
> > Ave Imperator Bush!
> > Bush Was Right! Four More Years!
>
> Dont need to know any names, vote a straight democratic ticket. Anyone,
> and I mean anyone but Bush in 04!!!

So you would have no problem with "President Carole Mostly-Fraud"?

Re: Slowly but surely
 

John‰]
wrote:

> In article
> <cG9wdXA=.2928b8ac10b6305aba092e2dd45f8ff4@1063037 514.cotse.net>,
> Pudding Tame <jellopud-no-spam@cotse.net> wrote:
>
> > Horvath wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:04:10 +0200 (CEST), Tarapia Tapioco
> > > <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote this crap:
> > >
> > > >Throw the bum out in 04
> > > >___________
> > > >
> > > >Bush Job Approval Falls in Two U.S. Polls
> > > >Sat Sep 6, 4:37 PM ET
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > 2/3 Democrats still can't name one person running for president.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hero@Horvath.net
> > >
> > > Ave Imperator Bush!
> > > Bush Was Right! Four More Years!
> >
> > Dont need to know any names, vote a straight democratic ticket. Anyone,
> > and I mean anyone but Bush in 04!!!
>
> So you would have no problem with "President Carole Mostly-Fraud"?

Carol Moseley Braun would be better than Bush for Our Country, so would
any of the other repugs running, Anyone but Bush would be better.


Other repugs running:


Albertha Moultrie Brinson (R-New York) *
F. Dean Christensen (R-Arizona) *
Thomas S. Fabish (R-California) *
Lowell "Jack" Fellure (R-West Virginia) *
Hoover Mark Gee (R-California) *
Michael Idrogo (R-Texas) *
Donnie Kennedy (R-Louisiana) *
Mildred "Millie" Howard (R-Ohio) *
Derrick C. Johnson (R-Oregon) *
Louis J. Rapuano Jr. (R-Connecitcut) *
Keith Slinker (R-Pennsylvania) *

Or democrats:
Howard Dean *
John Edwards *
Dick Gephardt *
Bob Graham *
John Kerry *
Dennis Kucinich *
Joe Lieberman *
Al Sharpton *
Warren R. Ashe (D-Virginia) *
Donald P. Award (D-Connecticut) *
Jerry G. Beck (D-Missouri) *
Sanderson Beck (D-California) *
Jim Bollinger (D-Indiana) *
Willie Carter (D-Texas) *
Patrick Cazneau (D-California) *
Randy Crow (D-North Carolina) *
John Estrada (D-Nevada) *
Susan Fey (D-Colorado) *
James I. Glover (D-New Jersey) *
Al Hamburg (D-Wyoming) *
Amanda Lou Hardy (D-DC) *
Ken Hill (D-South Carolina) *
Alfonzo Jones (D-New York) *
Lyndon LaRouche (D-New York) *
Glenn D. Leaverton (California) *
Sherry Meadows (D-Texas) *
Grady Dean Mollenhauer Jr. (D-New York) *
Fred Ogin (D-Oregon) *
Bill Pearman (D-Indiana) *
Fern Penna (D-New York) *
James J. Prattas (D-Hawaii) *
John Donald Rigazio (D-New Hampshire) *
Adam Safran (D-California) *
Ole S. Savior (D-Minnesota) *
Craig E. Sharp (D-Texas) *
Former Congressman Jim Traficant (D-Ohio) #*
Evelyn L. Vitullo (D-Arizona) *
Lucian J. "Louie" Wojciechowski (California) *

Anyone But Bush!!

Only 420 Days Until Election Day -- November 2, 2004!! Bush is gone!!
--

Re: Re: Slowly but surely
 

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:04:57 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
<dhunt@i70west.nospam.com> wrote this crap:

>> 2/3 Democrats still can't name one person running for president.
>
>I can name a few. But after 6 beers they do look much better.

Do you realize you just outted yourself?


Hero@Horvath.net

Ave Imperator Bush!
Bush Was Right! Four More Years!

Re: Slowly but surely
 

On 9 Sep 2003 00:19:30 GMT, Horvath <Hero@Horvath.nosepamm.net> wrote:

>On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:04:57 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
><dhunt@i70west.nospam.com> wrote this crap:
>
>>> 2/3 Democrats still can't name one person running for president.
>>
>>I can name a few. But after 6 beers they do look much better.
>
>Do you realize you just outted yourself?
>
>
>Hero@Horvath.net
>
>Ave Imperator Bush!
>Bush Was Right! Four More Years!

maybe he was talking about hitlery.



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----