[exlrrp]

Originally posted by Gimpy hope you can finish your book ASAP so we can have the pleasure of watching his sorry butt squirm and attempt to lie and deceive his way out of the truth as he has done with many of the lies he and his 'gang of thugs have committed so far these past 5 years, and before!

Keep up the good work!

Gimpy
I work on it every day. When I'm not here, you can go ahead and think I'm working on it because I probably am. I not only am writing the book, I write influential people I know every day. I went to Congman Peter Defazio and he forwarded that report I cite on Kos to the USAF IG and OSI--which they'll probably ignore.
LAws have been broken and I want the miscreants brought to justice-if the papers ARE forged then Bush should be exonerated and the forgers put in jail. If theyre real, then Bush and his superiors need to see the inside of a jail: they recklessly broke laws and regulations to save Bush's ass. I hope you read the Kos Diary I cited: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/9/28/124119/186#2 I lay it all out there.
You have to understand the basic truths, like:
>The CBS papers represent federal documents, NOT private papers like Bush and his people want you to believe.
> Forging federal documents is a SERIOUS federal crime, not something to be settled by a few firings from CBS
>The USAF could prove or disprove these papers very easily--they have not only the forensic capability but the investigative capability to put all the participants unde oath (Bush, Hodges, Martin, Staudt, Buill Burkett, Marion Knox) and put their story together.
>George BUsh and his aides HAVE to know right now--and always have--whether the papers are real or not--and are refusing to say.
>The Bush Administration--and the USAF have shirked their duty to investigate and prosecute the wrong doing concerning these papers although the papers purport to be USAF documents, that if forged libel the president.
Why? why wouldn't they investigate allegedly forged federal documents that, if forged as they say, libel the President? And several other USAG (ANG) officers?
The answer to that is that they got everything they wanted--beyond their wildest dreams--in their "Blogger's Court" which they had been setting up in advance. The Story turned around, CBS in tatters, Rather kicked to the curb--and no investigation of the papers at all and Bush never had to confront and affirm or deny the papers reality!! Misssion Accomplished!!. It all ended so beautifully for the Republicans, they don't want to be bothered with the legal formalities--like justice, legal procedure, the rule of law--not bloggers.
It ended so beautifully for the Republicans, it was almost as if they had planned it that way. Long in advance.
And if the papers are real, they would have had decades to set up their trick play--get the papers delacred false without an official investigation and without the one man who knows for sure ever saying. They would have had their answer ready within minutes of the CBS papers emergence--and so they did. Detailed analysis of the papers that normally takes weeks and months, all done in a few hours (prepared in advance? You betcha--that means they KNEW about these papers in advance--which means theyre real.)

Re: the order to take his physical: Do you know that Bush refused to answer whether he had been ordered to take his physical when asked specifically that by the AP? I forgot to put that down on the post above.
Here's a classic example of Bush Administration media manipulation:
from: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in646621.shtml
"...The White House did not answer whether Bush disobeyed a direct order to take the exam...."
You read that right Gimp--Bush refused to answer whether he had been ordfered to take his physical. All of a sudden this may look more real to you now: http://www.awolbush.com/documents/BushGuardmay4.pdf
Look where that statment is in the article--2d to bottom line. It SHOULD have been the headline and BUsh should have been made to answer that. AMerica needs to know if their C in C refused to obey a direct order. But no, it got stuck in the most obscure place in the article, where it would be cut off first for brevity. The mostimportant fact in the article
Bush refused to answer whetner he had been ordered to take his physical or not and an order for him to do just that pops up--which he doesn't deny.
Note the date of that article--almost a months AFTER the CBS papers emerged. You know as well as me that if there was ANY way that BUsh could have answered NO to that question he would have--but he couldn't. CBS are fools for not realizing that they had the key to their probelms right here: Bush KNOWS whether he was ordered to take his physical and the only reasonble reason for him not saying so is that he was.
Whats amazing is that CBS had the answer to their problem right there--just insist that Bush answer that question Yes or No. They should have had Rather standing up and asking: Were You ordered to take your physical and is this the order? And the same for the suspension order--just keep asking him where the original order is, what it says and why its not in his records. Bush WAS suspended on 1 Aug 72 for SOME reason--we have the confirmation documents. But the original order writen by Killian is missing as you can see leafing through Unfit.
Thats where Unfit for Command helps out--by putting the paperwork in chronological order. I had done this months in advance of Smith. Thats how you get the true story, which is why the Bush people scrambled it.
Look at the 2 confiormation documents, dated 9/5/72 (Hodges and Martin) and 9/22/72 (ARPC) Hodges and Martim's confirmation CAN'T be the original one--its dated over a month late and regs cited above, ibid, state that the order has to be done "on or before the effective date." No way Hodges order is the original if thats the requirement, its done over a month later. Plus there's nothing in it about "Verbal order having been given" as the ARPC confirms: ergo: someone else did the verbal orders. Bush's commander ["Cmdr"] Col Jerry Killian.
Look at the documents given in Unfit for the year 1972. There SHOULD be an aeronautical order from Killian, dated 8/1/72 and signed for By Bush--this no matter WHAT reason there was for the suspension. There isn't one there! Whats up with THAT?
Now, how could George Bush and his aides NOT know that? How could Bush NOT know that Killian's original order is missing?
He Knows right now all about the fact that its missing--again, how could he not? This is the most important document of his militray career.
And so do Hodges and Martin, both of whom are signed on on the 9/5/72 document as having seen the original. Yet each of them only say" they don't remember seeing them before" just like Bush. YET THEY SAW THE ORIGINAL SUSPENSION ORDER!! as did Bush.
If they saw the original suspension order and still suspected that these were false, then why didn't ANY of them call for an offical investigation? The papers also libel Hodges in the extreme: "...Staudt has obviously pressured Hodges more about Bush...Harris gave me a message from Grp [Hodges} and Staudt is pushing to sugarcoat it..." If ths is false, both Hodges and Staudt have been libeled--but neiither one wants aninvestigation nor will gove details of Bush's suspension--of which Hodges and Martin know every detail.
I'm working on it as fast as I can and trying to get the information out. I'm going to keep working on it untill Bush gets justice on this--which is what he is most afraid of
Stay good
James