HC.....
I?ll go with not being judgmental HC, you?re right. In my view about the only thing Peterson is suspect of is acting like a heel hound with a muzzle full of yoke, shells and feathers from the get-go then doing the predictable, ?hey man, I don?t know no nuthun bout no hen house?. I don?t think looking guilty as hell is a crime but will sure get the Cops undivided attention all of a sudden. So we?ll see where it all goes and I fully suspect that those defense Tasmanian devils and whirling dervishes are giving the prosecution a lot of sleepless nights. Or it could be that the prosecution has their case nailed down and are just going through the process, who knows. But the much-advertised ?Amber? testimony probably isn?t going to be as a Peterson character witness I?m thinking, and if not, I expect that the defense will rip her a new one. That?s too bad, as it appears she is just a hapless, ignorant and gullible play toy in the whole mess, at least that's what I percieve.
Scamp
|