"Richard Rongstad" wrote in message
news:402CE177.26AA3778@NOSPAMvikiingphoenix.com...
> Right wing wacko Roger mounted an attack on a Liberal and wrote:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> > > (1) By your standards then, far left-wing wackos think that
> > > because another newspaper is "Washington Post", that it's credible.
> >
> > It's credible because it's credible. Because it has a history of being
> > credible.
>
> That's incredible.
>
> > > (2) I'm neither a Moonie or a right-wing wacko,
> > > and I find the Washington Times at least as credible
> > > if not more so than Wash. Post and NY Times, so
> > > part of your wacko theory is out the window.
> >
> > You're probably more right-wing wacko than you think. Or more gullable.
>
> Impossible. I am a Liberal.
>
> > >
> > > (3) The Washington Times might owe it's credibility to
> > > the lack of credibility exhibited by the fish wrap newspapers
> > > such as Washington Post and New York Times, which is no real
> > > compliment to Washington Times, and does not speak well of
> > > Washington Post and NY Times.
> >
> > If you think the NYT and WP are "fish wrapers", you are a right-wing
wacko.
>
> Impossible. I am a Liberal.

Bullshit. You prefer the WT over the NYT and WP.

Liar.