[39mto39g]

I belive I could win a miss trial from this dumb ass Judge.

Scott gets arested and charged with Pre-meditated Murder.
Goes to trial.
Judge lets prosicuter put in evidence about Scotts boat and has a therey about what Scott did and will not let Scotts Lawyer do the same.
Judge gives the jury a nother charge that they can consider, but only after the trial is over, Just as they are going off to deliberate the judge says they can also concider a Murder verdic without Pre-meditation. Now all through the trial the case has been built on the premiss that Scott plained the murder and Pre-meditated Murder gets the death penalty. Now, after the trial is over he says just in case you don't decide that its pre-meditated you can also convict with a murder vertic.
Judge lets jurer stand in boat and rock it back and forth. Then the judge says it wasn't experimenting with evidence (against the law) it was investigating evidence?
Judge kicks a jurer off and doesn't put a gag order on him.
Judge kicks another jurer off because she did some investigating on her own?
Judge lets another jurer go because he wanted to leave?
And finally, one more jurer is going to leave because of a planed surgery.

How did this guy get to be a judge, wether Scott did it or not makes no difference to how a trial should be held.

Ron