View Single Post
  #3  
Old 01-01-2004, 04:26 AM
EL CHINO BOATMEN'S CONSCIENCE
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default FAULTY LOGICS NOT MOTHERFUCKER! Re: SLANDERING NOT SPYING....

I had the impression that you were better educated and less biased
than The Brainless Veedom , Vietthot or Lapdogs but I was wrong.

It was not because you used Four-letter words against El Chino your
Conscience who is the Master of Four-letter words himself but because
your logic was faulty.

If Some Vietkong People Tribunal were saying "The People hereby
condemn Muamuathu to 7 years of prison for his crime of being a
Mother Fucker, A child Molester , A thief and A traitor and If El
Chino were his Defense Lawyer, He would say:

-None of your accusations were true . If He were guilty of any crime,
it were for being stupid. There were no laws against being
stupid--But there should be one for Brainless Anti Communists like
Veedom ,VIETTHOT and You--I therefore ask the People to Release Him
because He had been in jail for one year which is enough punishment
for being stupid.

This was the same logics El Chino Used to defend the Brave Nguyen Vu
Binh –I admired his courage even for being wrong not his stupidity in
slandering the Vietkong accusing Him without proof of selling
national territory.

The better way for Anti Communist like you to defend Mr Binh on SCV
was to make a clear case that the Vietkong had sold national territory
and maritime waters based on facts and logics not on hearsays and
fabrications.



"Mua Mua Thu" wrote in message news:...
> "EL CHINO BOATMEN'S CONSCIENCE" wrote in
> message news:6ea9eed5.0312311535.24518a94@posting.google.c om...
>
> > Mr Nguyen Vu Binh was accused of spying for the benefit of whom the
> > VCP did not say.

>
> ***** "Did not say" means they have no proof, and since they have no proof.
> Then they have no case against him.
>
> > He was accused of slandering the VCP for selling the
> > national territpry and maritime waters. None of this accusation was
> > true

>
> ***** Yes, the very words of yours confirm it.
>
> >so at the most, Mr Binh could be charged of slandering the VCP
> > not for spying.
> >

> ***** Here is what the your shitty head does not know what your shitty mouth
> is saying. You have just said "None of this accusation was true" - right
> there, just at the above sentence. Your words are totally in contradiction
> to one another. How can you suggest a charge against Binh while you agree
> that the accusation is false?
>
> > Such a charge should not be punished by more than one year in prison
> > and since Mr Binh had been jailed for more than one year. I urge the
> > VCP to release Mr Binh immediately to show the World that its judicial
> > system is catching up with its economic growth
> >

>
> ***** He should not have been arrested in the first place, let alone to be
> jailed for 7 years. The Vietnamese communist government has made a mockery
> to its justice system (if there is any).
>
> Mu+a Mu`a Thu

Reply With Quote