Va^~n con` muo^'n ca~i ngang ca~i bu+o+'ng pha?i kho^ng?

"EL CHINO BOATMEN'S CONSCIENCE" wrote in
message news:6ea9eed5.0401010426.35868d1c@posting.google.c om...
> I had the impression that you were better educated and less biased
> than The Brainless Veedom , Vietthot or Lapdogs but I was wrong.
>

***** I wouldn't care less what you think about me.

> It was not because you used Four-letter words against El Chino your
> Conscience who is the Master of Four-letter words himself but because
> your logic was faulty.
>
***** You are not my conscience. My conscience is clear and sound. How can
you claim to be my conscience while you do not have enough brain to write
either in Vietnamese or in English correctly.

So, you are the master of using four letter words. Then what sort of a
person are you?

> If Some Vietkong People Tribunal were saying "The People hereby
> condemn Muamuathu to 7 years of prison for his crime of being a
> Mother Fucker, A child Molester , A thief and A traitor and If El
> Chino were his Defense Lawyer, He would say:
> -None of your accusations were true .

***** This is where the argument between you and I lies. I have raised my
opinion against what you said in the previous post. Yet, you still do not
understand it.

If you were my lawyer, and in my defense against the accusations from the
court. You told the court that none of the accusations were true. That means
in your opinion, I am innocent of all the charges.

Since I am innocent of all the charges. How on earth can you suggest to the
court that I should be jailed? Where is your logic?

Now I want to go back to your first post, and here is what you said.

|| "Mr Nguyen Vu Binh was accused of spying for the benefit of whom the
|| VCP did not say. He was accused of slandering the VCP for selling the
|| national territpry and maritime waters. None of this accusation was
|| true so at the most, Mr Binh could be charged of slandering the VCP
|| not for spying."

So he was accused of two things - spying and slandering the VCP, and you
said "None of this accusation was true." That means you have agreed that he
is not guilty of spying and slandering.

Then, how can you said "he could be charged of slandering the VCP..."

If you were his defense lawyer. Then what sort of a defense lawyer are you?
and from what law school did you graduate?

> If He were guilty of any crime,
> it were for being stupid. There were no laws against being
> stupid--But there should be one for Brainless Anti Communists like
> Veedom ,VIETTHOT and You--

***** Every country has its own law, and the law is applied to everyone.
There is no such thing as there is no law for one type of people and there
is a law for another type of people. If any country has such a law. Then the
law of that country should be called as "a cowboy law"

> I therefore ask the People to Release Him
> because He had been in jail for one year which is enough punishment
> for being stupid.

***** Yes, he must be released immediately, and the government must pay him
compensation for wrongly arrested and detained him. That is called the
justice.

> This was the same logics El Chino Used to defend the Brave Nguyen Vu
> Binh -I admired his courage even for being wrong not his stupidity in
> slandering the Vietkong accusing Him without proof of selling
> national territory.

***** If Nguye^~n Vu~ Bi`nh was wrong. Then who is occupying the two
islands - Hoa`ng Sa and Tru+o+`ng Sa at the moment? and why did Phan Thu'y
Thanh said as below, in response to the Chinese prohibition imposing upon
the Vietnamese fishermen fising at those two islands.

" Ba^'t cu+' ha`nh ddo^.ng na`o cu?a mo^.t quo^'c gia kha'c lie^n quan to+'i
ca'c qua^`n dda?o Hoa`ng Sa va` Tru+o+`ng Sa cu~ng nhu+ ca'c vu`ng kinh te^'
dda(.c quye^`n va` ca'c the^`m lu.c ddi.a cu?a Vie^.t Nam ma` kho^ng co'
su+. ddo^`ng y' cu?a chu'ng to^i se~ la` mo^.t vi pha.m chu? quye^`n Vie^.t
Nam."

Go to this website and see for yourself. It is a Chinese government website.

http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/

> The better way for Anti Communist like you to defend Mr Binh on SCV
> was to make a clear case that the Vietkong had sold national territory
> and maritime waters based on facts and logics not on hearsays and
> fabrications.
>

Of course, everyone who loves Vietnam, despise the political background,
will want to know the fact, and if there is nothing to hide, then why is it
the Vietnamese communist has not allowed any investigation into those
allegations?

In the case of Nguye^~n Vu~ Bi`nh, his defense lawyer must have been given
access to the Vietnamese government, and if that lawyer can not find any
evidence in supporting Bi`nh's claims. Then his sentence has been passed on
to him is fair, and right.

Did it happen? The answer is a big no.

The law supports justice. Where is the justice in Vietnam? beside the cowboy
law which the Vietnamese communist government is using.

Mu+a Mu`a Thu