LOGIC KIE^?U MO.I

La. Thu+.c ta.i sao tha(`ng Mo.i thuye^`n nho+ n na`y ku+' kha(ng
kha(ng kha(?ng (dde'o me. Ba chu+~ kha(ng, tie^'ng Vie^.t ta
tha^.t huye^`n zie^.u va` mo+` a?o muo^'n no'i chi ku~ng ddu+o+.c,
muo^'n hie^?u xao ku~ng OK ddi.nh la`=

1) tha(`ng Vietkong No' Ba'n Hoa`ng xa cho Ba Ta`u trong khi
Vietzankonghoa cu?a Anh Thie^.u la`m chu? (ho+`) cu?a chu'ng na(m
1974; qua^n ddo^.i Vietzankonghoa dde'o dda'nh mo^.t cha^.n na`o,
dde'o ko' ai ChE^"t khi Ba Ta`u xa^m Lu+o+.c Hoa`ng Xa, dda^`u Ha`ng
Ba Ta`u va` ddu+o+.c Ha?i Qua^n Ba Ta`u Cho ddi Ha?i Nam shopping sa?
La'ng va`I tua^`n ru`I cho Ve^` Saigon

2) Va` kha(?ng ddi.nh la` no' la.i Qua^`n Dda?o Tru+o+`ng Xa khi Ba
Ta`u ddem ha.m ddo^.i ma.nh ba(`ng tra(m la^`n ha.m ddo^.i cu?a Bo^.
Ddo^.i Ku. Ho^` va`o xa^m chie Tru+o+`ng Xa zu.

` chie^'n xi~ Bie^n fo`ng dda~ vo^ ku`ng zu~ng Ka?m dda^?y lui Ha.m
Ddo^.i Ba Ta`u o+? nhie^`u vi. Tri'.
Dda~ ko' ca? tra(m chie^'n si~ bo^. Ddo^.i ku. Ho^` anh zu~ng hi sanh
trong vie^.c dduo^?i Ha.m DDo^.i Ba Ta`u ^'m tuy nhie^n 1 fa^`n nho?
Ku?a qua^`n dda?o dda~ bi. Qua^n ddo^.i Ba Ta`u "ta.m tho+`I" chie^'m
ddo'ng.

3)Bo^. Ngoa.i zao cu?a Nu+o+'c Vietnam Kha(?ng ddi.nh lie^n tu.c va`
ko' ddi.nh ki` (Continuous revendication with periodical public
announcement, dde'o Me. Ha'n Viet)la` Tru+o+`ng Xa va` Hoa`ng Xa
thuo^.c chu? Quye^`n Vietnam.

Chuye^.n kha(?ng ddi.nh va` ta'I kha(?ng ddi.nh ddo' la` chuye^.n
ca^`n thie^'t nhu+'t la`khi ta chu+a ddu? Thu+.c lu+.c dda^?y lui
qua^n Ba Ta`u va` Quo^'c Te^' ku`ng le~ fa?i chu+a kga(?ng ddi.nh
Tru+o+`ng Xa va` Hoa`ng Xa la` hoa`n toa`n tro.n go'I cu?a ta.

Ta.i xao tha(`ng "Mo.i" Vietzan la.i dda'nh za' su+. Kha(?ng ddi.nh
qua lo+`I Ba` Pha.m thuy' Thanh la` Vietnam "Co^ng Nha^.n" chu?
Quye^`n cu?a Trung Ko^.ng Tre^n qua^`n dda?o Hoa`ng Xa va` Tru+o+`ng
Xa. The^' mo+'I Bie^'t ka'I Logics cu?a "Mo.i" no' ghe^ go+'m qua'

Ka'I Logics dda?o ngu+o+.c na^`y la`m za^n Vietzankonghoa Ta^?u hoa?
Nha^.p Ma, tra(‘ng tha`nh dden, Ye^u Nu+o+'c tha`nh Ba'n Nu+o+'c, he`n
nha't tha`nh zu~ng Ka?m , tie^'n tha`nh lu`I ne^n hoa`n toa`n bi te^
lie^.t khi dda'nh tha(`ng Vietkong khi xu+a va` dda'nh vo+'I Lu+o+ng
Chi cu?a Chu'ng No' ho^m nay !!!

BuO^`n ku+o+`I ghe^ qua' !!!!



"Mua Mua Thu" wrote in message news:...
> Va^~n con` muo^'n ca~i ngang ca~i bu+o+'ng pha?i kho^ng?
>
> "EL CHINO BOATMEN'S CONSCIENCE" wrote in
> message news:6ea9eed5.0401010426.35868d1c@posting.google.c om...
> > I had the impression that you were better educated and less biased
> > than The Brainless Veedom , Vietthot or Lapdogs but I was wrong.
> >
>
> ***** I wouldn't care less what you think about me.
>
> > It was not because you used Four-letter words against El Chino your
> > Conscience who is the Master of Four-letter words himself but because
> > your logic was faulty.
> >
> ***** You are not my conscience. My conscience is clear and sound. How can
> you claim to be my conscience while you do not have enough brain to write
> either in Vietnamese or in English correctly.
>
> So, you are the master of using four letter words. Then what sort of a
> person are you?
>
> > If Some Vietkong People Tribunal were saying "The People hereby
> > condemn Muamuathu to 7 years of prison for his crime of being a
> > Mother Fucker, A child Molester , A thief and A traitor and If El
> > Chino were his Defense Lawyer, He would say:
> > -None of your accusations were true .
>
> ***** This is where the argument between you and I lies. I have raised my
> opinion against what you said in the previous post. Yet, you still do not
> understand it.
>
> If you were my lawyer, and in my defense against the accusations from the
> court. You told the court that none of the accusations were true. That means
> in your opinion, I am innocent of all the charges.
>
> Since I am innocent of all the charges. How on earth can you suggest to the
> court that I should be jailed? Where is your logic?
>
> Now I want to go back to your first post, and here is what you said.
>
> || "Mr Nguyen Vu Binh was accused of spying for the benefit of whom the
> || VCP did not say. He was accused of slandering the VCP for selling the
> || national territpry and maritime waters. None of this accusation was
> || true so at the most, Mr Binh could be charged of slandering the VCP
> || not for spying."
>
> So he was accused of two things - spying and slandering the VCP, and you
> said "None of this accusation was true." That means you have agreed that he
> is not guilty of spying and slandering.
>
> Then, how can you said "he could be charged of slandering the VCP..."
>
> If you were his defense lawyer. Then what sort of a defense lawyer are you?
> and from what law school did you graduate?
>
> > If He were guilty of any crime,
> > it were for being stupid. There were no laws against being
> > stupid--But there should be one for Brainless Anti Communists like
> > Veedom ,VIETTHOT and You--
>
> ***** Every country has its own law, and the law is applied to everyone.
> There is no such thing as there is no law for one type of people and there
> is a law for another type of people. If any country has such a law. Then the
> law of that country should be called as "a cowboy law"
>
> > I therefore ask the People to Release Him
> > because He had been in jail for one year which is enough punishment
> > for being stupid.
>
> ***** Yes, he must be released immediately, and the government must pay him
> compensation for wrongly arrested and detained him. That is called the
> justice.
>
> > This was the same logics El Chino Used to defend the Brave Nguyen Vu
> > Binh -I admired his courage even for being wrong not his stupidity in
> > slandering the Vietkong accusing Him without proof of selling
> > national territory.
>
> ***** If Nguye^~n Vu~ Bi`nh was wrong. Then who is occupying the two
> islands - Hoa`ng Sa and Tru+o+`ng Sa at the moment? and why did Phan Thu'y
> Thanh said as below, in response to the Chinese prohibition imposing upon
> the Vietnamese fishermen fising at those two islands.
>
> " Ba^'t cu+' ha`nh ddo^.ng na`o cu?a mo^.t quo^'c gia kha'c lie^n quan to+'i
> ca'c qua^`n dda?o Hoa`ng Sa va` Tru+o+`ng Sa cu~ng nhu+ ca'c vu`ng kinh te^'
> dda(.c quye^`n va` ca'c the^`m lu.c ddi.a cu?a Vie^.t Nam ma` kho^ng co'
> su+. ddo^`ng y' cu?a chu'ng to^i se~ la` mo^.t vi pha.m chu? quye^`n Vie^.t
> Nam."
>
> Go to this website and see for yourself. It is a Chinese government website.
>
> http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/
>
> > The better way for Anti Communist like you to defend Mr Binh on SCV
> > was to make a clear case that the Vietkong had sold national territory
> > and maritime waters based on facts and logics not on hearsays and
> > fabrications.
> >
>
> Of course, everyone who loves Vietnam, despise the political background,
> will want to know the fact, and if there is nothing to hide, then why is it
> the Vietnamese communist has not allowed any investigation into those
> allegations?
>
> In the case of Nguye^~n Vu~ Bi`nh, his defense lawyer must have been given
> access to the Vietnamese government, and if that lawyer can not find any
> evidence in supporting Bi`nh's claims. Then his sentence has been passed on
> to him is fair, and right.
>
> Did it happen? The answer is a big no.
>
> The law supports justice. Where is the justice in Vietnam? beside the cowboy
> law which the Vietnamese communist government is using.
>
> Mu+a Mu`a Thu