|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
US uncaps Fannie/Freddie support, announces during Christmas holiday
US uncaps Fannie/Freddie support, announces during Christmas holiday
posted at 1:00 pm on December 26, 2009 by Ed Morrissey If an administration wanted to pull a fast one on American citizens and keep a move that puts them on the hook for hundreds of billion dollars as quiet as possible while still disclosing it, when would be the best time to take that action? How about an evening when people all across the country turn off their televisions and laptops to spend time with family and friends, celebrating an important religious holiday? Could any President be as calculating and cold-blooded as to do something like that? Welcome to the new transparency: The Obama administration’s decision to cover an unlimited amount of losses at the mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the next three years stirred controversy over the holiday.Why couldn’t they be reached? Because it was Christmas. The announcement was designed to put them out of reach, just as it was designed to keep the news out of reach from the general public. No one can seriously argue that Treasury and the White House woke up early on Christmas Eve and suddenly discovered a reason to lift the caps on the Fannie/Freddie bailout, after all. This had to be in the works for weeks. However, as the Wall Street Journal also reports, the White House had a deadline for acting unilaterally: The Treasury removed the cap on the size of available bailout funds by amending agreements it reached with the companies in September 2008, when the government seized control of the agencies under a legal process called conservatorship.I’m wondering when Democrats will begin complaining about the “unitary executive” during Obama’s presidency (a concept they didn’t understand in the first place). What reason would the White House need to lift the caps, anyway? Of the $400 billion authorized by the previous bailout, Treasury has only used $111 billion of it, almost evenly split between Fannie Mae ($60 billion) and Freddie Mac ($51 billion). The WSJ quotes an analyst from Credit Suisse as saying that the larger lending market would find the expansion of the Treasury commitment “reassuring,” but having almost $300 billion left in a line of credit should be pretty darned reassuring on its own. And if a larger commitment was needed, the White House could have set a new limit rather than uncap it altogether. It looks as though Obama wants to use Fannie and Freddie as proxies for more social engineering and wants to prepare for them to take more losses as a result. That would be the only reason to completely uncap the commitment to cover its losses. After all, the bailout was supposed to help put the two GSAs back into the black, and at the rate they have used that bailout (assuming no improvement), we wouldn’t have to worry about exceeding caps until 2012. I’d bet that the Obama administration retools its foreclosure prevention programs to have Fannie and Freddie buy up the paper and forgive parts of the principal on the loans, and have taxpayers eat the losses on a massive basis. Update: Business Insider’s Joe Weisenthal asked credit analyst Edward Pinto for his analysis, and he also thinks this sets up more massive government intervention and control of the lending markets. Pinto lists five possibilities for action, and concludes: The above actions would preserve and strengthen the government’s involvement and control over the country’s housing finance system and make it harder to reintroduce substantial private sector involvement later on. They would also continue distortions in the marketplace leading to who knows what unintended consequences. Finally these steps would do nothing to deleverage the housing finance system, a key step in returning it to any degree of normality.Be sure to read it all. (via Twitter from Joe Weisenthal) http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/2...stmas-holiday/
__________________
|
Sponsored Links |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Silver Bullets: Legislation Pending in the House to Kill Fannie and Freddie and the C | sfc_darrel | Political Debate | 1 | 12-01-2008 04:24 AM |
Fannie Mae Ex-Officers Sued by U.S. | darrels joy | General Posts | 13 | 10-01-2008 07:55 AM |
Freddie, Fannie and Obama | SuperScout | Political Debate | 7 | 09-21-2008 08:03 AM |
The Corpse Of Christmas Past - A Modern Christmas Carol | HARDCORE | General Posts | 1 | 12-30-2007 10:57 PM |
Holiday Support for The Troops | MORTARDUDE | General Posts | 0 | 12-06-2003 12:42 AM |
|