|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
I must confess I am not a veteran and this is the first visit to this news
group so I hope I don't step on anyone toes. The hubby and I got into a discussion of whether the Army ever disclosed that 3 Purple Hearts would get a soldier a free pass home. The reason I ask is the spouse held a bit of a ranking and had never heard this clause /loophole before this week Second question being, do you believe it was it easier for officers to fill necessary paperwork to request medals? And finally was there much documentation required for requisition of a Purple Heart. The reason I asking is because of Michael Morans article on MSNBC and because I might be asked to aid in applying for Bronze Stars for MS for an entire platoon. A whole lota paperwork. . Don't mean to offend or cast dispersions on anyone. |
Sponsored Links |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
>Subject: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
>From: theviewfan@aol.c As i was reading your question a strange thought Occurred to me. Who would've thunk that someday the outcome of a presidential election would depend on someone's Vietnam record. Did George Bush report for l Guard duty and did John Kerrie fabricate the extend of his injuries to get out of Vietnam ? I think we may see positive recognition many of us so secretly desired for ourselves and for our families. . I was told when when I deros to wear civies thru the airport because of guys like John Kerry A presidential hopeful may have spit on me 30 yeas ago but today I think he will play the NAM card and he will use it for all its worth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
dlovick195@aol.com (DLovick195) wrote:
>>Subject: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam >>From: theviewfan@aol.c > >As i was reading your question a strange thought Occurred to me. Who would've >thunk that someday the outcome of a presidential election would depend on >someone's Vietnam record. Did George Bush report for l Guard duty and did John >Kerrie fabricate the extend of his injuries to get out of Vietnam ? No one thinks Kerry fabricated his wounds. They were there, pretty much minor in nature, for all to see. All three times. Doug |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
"Doug Reese" news:402e18a1$0$3087$61fed72c@news.rcn.com... > dlovick195@aol.com (DLovick195) wrote: > >>Subject: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam > >>From: theviewfan@aol.c > > > >As i was reading your question a strange thought Occurred to me. Who would've > >thunk that someday the outcome of a presidential election would depend on > >someone's Vietnam record. Did George Bush report for l Guard duty and did John > >Kerrie fabricate the extend of his injuries to get out of Vietnam ? > > No one thinks Kerry fabricated his wounds. They were there, pretty much minor in > nature, for all to see. All three times. > > Doug > Perhaps we ought to demand Kerry open his entire medical file. Has anyone come forward who treated Kerry's wounds? Has anyone come forward who actually saw Kerry get wounded? I know Kerry's military records show he was in Vietnam but was he really in Vietnam? Yea, stupid questions but no more stupid than those asked of Bush. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
Doug Reese wrote:
> > dlovick195@aol.com (DLovick195) wrote: > >>Subject: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam > >>From: theviewfan@aol.c > > > >As i was reading your question a strange thought Occurred to me. Who would've > >thunk that someday the outcome of a presidential election would depend on > >someone's Vietnam record. Did George Bush report for l Guard duty and did John > >Kerrie fabricate the extend of his injuries to get out of Vietnam ? > > No one thinks Kerry fabricated his wounds. They were there, pretty much minor in > nature, for all to see. All three times. > > Doug By Kerry's own admission he had three owies. When he became a three-timer, Kerry exercised his option under a NAVORV or MACV directive that said three wounds could be a ticket home, but in his case it probably wasn't mandatory. I for one don't think Kerry fabricated anything about his wounds. In fact, there is this; "When later asked about the severity of the wounds, Kerry said that one of them cost him about two days of service, and that the other two did not interrupt his duty. 'Walking wounded,' as Kerry put it. John Kerry put in his chit to rotate home after three wounds in March and returned to the U.S. in April 1969, to serve on an admiral's staff." above IAW - Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
"Jeff Laventure"
> >"Doug Reese" >news:402e18a1$0$3087$61fed72c@news.rcn.com... >> dlovick195@aol.com (DLovick195) wrote: >> >>Subject: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam >> >>From: theviewfan@aol.c >> > >> >As i was reading your question a strange thought Occurred to me. Who >would've >> >thunk that someday the outcome of a presidential election would depend on >> >someone's Vietnam record. Did George Bush report for l Guard duty and >did John >> >Kerrie fabricate the extend of his injuries to get out of Vietnam ? >> >> No one thinks Kerry fabricated his wounds. They were there, pretty much >minor in >> nature, for all to see. All three times. >> >> Doug >> >Perhaps we ought to demand Kerry open his entire medical file. >Has anyone come forward who treated Kerry's wounds? >Has anyone come forward who actually saw Kerry get wounded? Yep, about 15 Navy guys who were there when he was wounded. >I know Kerry's military records show he was in Vietnam but was he really in >Vietnam? Yes. I saw him. But then, was I really in Vietna? >Yea, stupid questions but no more stupid than those asked of Bush. To a degree. Doug |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
Assuming you are not a troll and are truly interested...
I do not believe that you will find anywhere in regulations that three wounds automatically sends one home from a battle zone. I never heard that. There may have been some local informal rules that a unit or command exercised, but I do not believe it is in regulations. Is it easier for an officer to do the paperwork? Of course. In some cases the officer is in a garrison situation while the soldiers are in the field. The officer has access to a typewriter and clerks while the common soldier may not. Although in theory anyone can nominate anyone for an award, I always got the highest ranking officer I could find to sign the paperwork on a soldier that I wrote up, because at higher HQ they were going to want to see an officer's signature. The simple fact is that there is a caste system and the officer is of a higher caste than the enlisted man. That should come as no secret to anyone who has been in the service. Finally, the vast majority of enlisted personnel had no idea how to fill out the paperwork for a medal. An officer could grab a company clerk and order it filled out, and that might have been the one guy in a unit that knew how to do it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
"Herb F." wrote:
> > Assuming you are not a troll and are truly interested... > > I do not believe that you will find anywhere in regulations that three > wounds automatically sends one home from a battle zone. I never heard > that. There may have been some local informal rules that a unit or > command exercised, but I do not believe it is in regulations. That is what I remember. I have a hazy remembrance of a MACV rule about three wounds, it was an option for the woundee and no doubt MACV had it typed up and printed up and distributed all over SE Asia. If the wound was disabling, then the option was not in effect. Although, it seems to me that a really dinged up guy might be able to fight his way back in-country, as long as it was not an amputation or loss of an eye. If you were already medevaced, and sitting in a hospital in Japan or Okinawa, it might have been easier to exercise the option to go home or go back. In the case of John Kerry, there was likely a NAVFORV instruction or other directive giving guidance. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 0249 GMT, Richard Rongstad
>"Herb F." wrote: >> >> Assuming you are not a troll and are truly interested... >> >> I do not believe that you will find anywhere in regulations that three >> wounds automatically sends one home from a battle zone. I never heard >> that. There may have been some local informal rules that a unit or >> command exercised, but I do not believe it is in regulations. > >That is what I remember. I have a hazy remembrance of a MACV rule >about three wounds, it was an option for the woundee and no doubt >MACV had it typed up and printed up and distributed all over SE Asia. > >If the wound was disabling, then the option was not in effect. Although, >it seems to me that a really dinged up guy might be able to fight his >way >back in-country, as long as it was not an amputation or loss of an eye. > >If you were already medevaced, and sitting in a hospital in Japan or >Okinawa, it might have been easier to exercise the option to go home or >go back. In the case of John Kerry, there was likely a NAVFORV >instruction or other directive giving guidance. In my platoon we all thought three Purple Hearts would get us a free pass home. I don't remember anyone ever getting back to the world this way. I also remember being told that a wound causing disfigurement of the face would get you back to the world. In regards to officers getting more medals than the enlisted man, it is a fact. I did a survery once using 4th ID casualty records and comparing KIA's by rank and if I remember correctly a Major was more than ten times more likely to recieve a Silver Star, than a Sp 4. Now if you consider how many ambushes and platoon sweeps a field grade officer goes on, it makes it seem even more a sham in my eyes. I think a groundpounder really had to do something special to earn the award, where I think the Major may in some cases receive the award for only having done a good job. http://www.vietnow.com/artbc.htm |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A qestion for Combat Verterans of Vietnam
In my year in country, which was with a direct support 105 howitzer
battalion, I knew of one man who was awarded the Silver Star. He was a 1st. Lt. FO named Jankowski, from Cleveland. I wasn't present at the action involved, but it the citation was anywhere near accurate, Jankowski earned his award. He was also nuts. ted "Tom Lacombe" news:402ef0b5.60769429@news.shentel.net... > On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 0249 GMT, Richard Rongstad > > > >"Herb F." wrote: > >> > >> Assuming you are not a troll and are truly interested... > >> > >> I do not believe that you will find anywhere in regulations that three > >> wounds automatically sends one home from a battle zone. I never heard > >> that. There may have been some local informal rules that a unit or > >> command exercised, but I do not believe it is in regulations. > > > >That is what I remember. I have a hazy remembrance of a MACV rule > >about three wounds, it was an option for the woundee and no doubt > >MACV had it typed up and printed up and distributed all over SE Asia. > > > >If the wound was disabling, then the option was not in effect. Although, > >it seems to me that a really dinged up guy might be able to fight his > >way > >back in-country, as long as it was not an amputation or loss of an eye. > > > >If you were already medevaced, and sitting in a hospital in Japan or > >Okinawa, it might have been easier to exercise the option to go home or > >go back. In the case of John Kerry, there was likely a NAVFORV > >instruction or other directive giving guidance. > In my platoon we all thought three Purple Hearts would get us a free > pass home. I don't remember anyone ever getting back to the world > this way. I also remember being told that a wound causing > disfigurement of the face would get you back to the world. In regards > to officers getting more medals than the enlisted man, it is a fact. I > did a survery once using 4th ID casualty records and comparing KIA's > by rank and if I remember correctly a Major was more than ten times > more likely to recieve a Silver Star, than a Sp 4. Now if you consider > how many ambushes and platoon sweeps a field grade officer goes on, it > makes it seem even more a sham in my eyes. I think a groundpounder > really had to do something special to earn the award, where I think > the Major may in some cases receive the award for only having done a > good job. > http://www.vietnow.com/artbc.htm |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Longest War: Vietnam War Combat Art | Otis Willie | General | 0 | 01-15-2004 07:34 PM |
U.S. Airborne Combat Jumps in Vietnam and other wars | Otis Willie | General | 0 | 12-27-2003 04:15 PM |
Vietnam Combat Veterans Simulator Kit :) | Greg Linscott | General | 9 | 12-02-2003 03:56 PM |
Re: Did JFK lie to avoid sending U.S. troops into combat in Vietnam? | Ed Moise | General | 1 | 08-15-2003 06:47 PM |
Combat Action Reports (Vietnam) | thedrifter | Vietnam | 0 | 10-15-2002 03:15 PM |
|