![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Zell Miller is a Senator from Georgia and a Democrat. But he speaks the
>truth and this needed to be said. > >U.S. Senator Zell Miller > >Floor Statement: 'A House Divided Cannot Stand' >Remarks as Delivered on the Senate Floor > >After watching the harsh acrimony generated by the September 11 Commission >- which, let me say at the outset, is made up of good and able members - >I've come to seriously question this panel's usefulness. > >I believe it will ultimately play a role in doing great harm to this >country, for its unintended consequences, I fear, will be to energize our >enemies and demoralize our troops. > >After being drowned in a tidal wave of all who didn't do enough before >9/11, I have come to believe that the Commission should issue a report that >says: "No one did enough in the past. No one did near enough." > >Then thank everyone for serving, send them home and let's get on with the >job of protecting this country in the future. > >Tragically, these hearings have proved to be a very divisive diversion for >this country. Tragically, they have devoured valuable time, looking >backwards when we should be looking forward. > >Can you imagine handling the attack on Pearl Harbor this way? Can you >imagine Congress, the media and the public standing for this kind of >political gamesmanship and finger pointing after that "day of infamy" in >1941? > >Some partisans tried that ploy, but they were soon quieted by the patriots >who understood how important it was to get on with the war and take the >battle to America's enemies, and not dwell on what FDR knew when. > >You see, back then the highest priority was to win a war, not win an >election. That's what made them "The Greatest Generation." > >I realize that many well-meaning Americans see the hearings as "democracy >in action." Years ago, when I was teaching political science, I probably >would have had my class watching it live on television and using that very >phrase with them. > >There are also the not-so-well-meaning political operatives who see these >hearings as an opportunity to "score cheap points." > >Then, there are the Media Meddlers who see this as "great theater" that can >be played out on the evening news and on endless talk shows for a week or >more. > >Congressional hearings have long been one of Washington's most entertaining >pastimes. Joe McCarthy Watergate. Iran Contra. They all kept us glued to >the TV, and made for conversation around the water coolers and arguments >over a beer at the corner pub. > >A Congressional hearing in Washington, D.C. is the ultimate aphrodisiac for >political groupies and partisan punks. > >But, it's not the groupies, punks and television-sotted American public >that I'm worried about. This latter crowd can get excited and divided over >just about anything. Whether it's some off-key wanna-be dreaming of being >the American Idol, or what brainless bimbo The Bachelor or Average Joe will >choose or who will Donald Trump fire next week. > >No, it is the real enemies of America that I'm concerned about. > >These evil killers who right now, right now are gleefully watching the >shrill partisan finger pointing of these hearings and grinning like a mule >eating briars. > >They see this as a major split within the Great Satan America. They see >anger, they see division, instability, bickering, peevishness and >dissension. > >They see the President of the United States hammered unmercifully. They see >all this and they are greatly, greatly encouraged. > >We should not be doing anything to encourage our enemies in this battle >between good and evil. Yet, these hearings, in my opinion, are doing just >that. > >We are playing with fire. We're playing directly into the hands of our >enemy by allowing these hearings to become the great divider they have >become. > >Dick Clarke's book and its release coinciding with these hearings have done >this country a tremendous disservice, and someday we will reap its >whirlwind. > >Long ago, Sir Walter Scott observed that revenge is "the sweetest morsel >that ever was cooked in hell." > >The vindictive Clarke has now had his revenge, but what kind of hell has >he, his CBS publisher and his axe-to-grind advocates unleashed? > >These hearings, coming on the heels of the election the terrorists >influenced in Spain, bolster and energize our evil enemies as they have not >been energized since 9/11. > >Chances are very good that these evil enemies of America will attempt to >influence our 2004 election in a similar dramatic way as they did Spain's. >And to think that could never be in this country is to stick your head in >the sand. > >That is why the sooner we stop this endless bickering over the past and >join together to prepare for the future, the better off this country will >be. There are some things - whether this city believes it or not - that are >just more important than political campaigns. > >The recent past is so ripe for political second-guessing "gotcha" and >Monday morning quarter-backing And it is so tempting in an election year. >We should not allow ourselves to indulge that temptation. We should put our >country first. > >Every administration from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush bears some of the >blame. Dick Clarke bears a big heap of it because it was he who was in the >catbird's seat to do something about it for more than a decade. Tragically, >it was the decade in which we did the least. > >We did nothing after terrorists attacked the World Trade Center in 1993, >killing six and injuring more than 1,000 Americans. > >We did nothing in 1996 when sixteen U.S. servicemen were killed in the >bombing of the Khobar Towers. > >When our embassies were attacked in 1998, killing 263 people, our only >response was to fire a few missiles on an empty tent. > >Is it any wonder? Is it any wonder that after that decade of weak-willed >responses to that murderous terror, our enemies thought we would never >fight back? > >In the 1990's is when Dick Clarke should have resigned. In the 1990's is >when he should have apologized. That is when he should have written his >book. That is, if he really had America's best interest at heart. > >Some will say, "We owe it to the families" to get more information about >what happened in the past and I can understand that. But no amount of >finger-pointing will bring our victims back. > >So, now we owe it to future families and all of America now in jeopardy not >to encourage more terrorists, resulting in even more grieving families, >perhaps many more over the ones of 9/11. > >It's obvious to me that this country is rapidly dividing itself into two >camps: the wimps and the warriors. > >The ones who want to argue and assess and appease, and the ones who want to >carry this fight to our enemies and kill them before they kill us. And, in >case you haven't figured it out, I proudly belong to the latter. > >This is a time like no other in the history of this country, and this >country is being crippled with petty partisan politics of the worst >possible kind. In time of war, it is not just unpatriotic; it is stupid, >and it is criminal. > >So, I pray that all this time, all this energy, all this talk and all this >attention could be focused on the future instead of the past. > >I pray we would stop pointing fingers, assigning blame and wringing our >hands about what happened on that day David McCullogh has called "the worst >day in our history" more than two years ago > >And instead, pour all of our energy into how we can kill these terrorists >before they kill us - again. > >For make no mistake about it. They watch these hearings. They are scheming >and smiling about the distraction and the divisiveness they see in America. >And while they may not know who said it years ago in America, they know >instinctively that a house divided cannot stand. > >There is one other group that we should remember is listening to all of >this - our troops. I was in Iraq in January and one day when I was meeting >with the 1st Armored Division, a unit with a proud history known as Old >Ironsides, we were discussing troop morale, and the Commanding General said >it was top notch. > >And I turned to the Division's Sergeant Major, the top enlisted man in the >division, a big, burly, 6-foot-3, 240 pound African American and I said, >"That's good, but how do you sustain that kind of morale?" > >Without hesitation he narrowed his eyes, and he looked at me and said "The >morale will stay high just as long as these troops know the people back >home support us." > >Just as long as the people back home support us. What kind of message are >these hearings and the outrageously political speeches on the floor of the >Senate yesterday sending to those marvelous young Americans in the uniform >of our country? > >I say Unite America! Before it is too late! Put aside these petty partisan >differences when it comes to the protection of our people. > >Argue and argue and argue and debate and debate and debate over all the >other things - jobs and education and the deficit and the environment - but >please, please do not use the lives of Americans and the security of this >country as a cheap-shot political talking point.
__________________
![]() Godspeed and keep low! |
Sponsored Links |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Good read Catman, thanks for posting it. Nice to know there is one sane Democrat out there who can see the forest and the trees.
|
|