3 missels

39mto39g · #1 07-04-2006, 01:46 PM

launche from North Korea, None long ranged, so far.

39mto39g · #2 07-04-2006, 02:36 PM

a long range intercontinental missle launched and was distroyed 40 sec after launch, For some reason, Malfunction, intentional, or ?
This lady on FOX , (julian) said that a nucular weapon was the strongest thing that could be launched by a missel.
I love it when news people talk about stuff they know nothing about.
The United States has Nucular war heads and Hydrogen war heads. Nucular are what you think of in WW2 in Japan, (the atom Bomb) Hydrogen war heads are not even in the same league.
A Atom bomb would distroy houston, A hydrogen bomb dropped on Houston, would knock down buildings in Dallas.
Nucular bombs distroy citys, Hydrogen Bombs distroy countrys.
A 50 meg Hydrogen bomb dropped of France would eliminate France, Period.
The USA would have to go way down on its bomb arsinal list to select a bomb that would only distroy North Korea.
North Korea has (maybe) a 20 mega-ton atom bomb. Which is a significant weapon. But in comparison it would be like a piper cub and a 747, Not even close to each other, as compaired to what the USA has.
Ron

Robert Ryan · #3 07-05-2006, 10:46 AM

And none of them worked worth a tinkers damn.

Seascamp · #4 07-05-2006, 12:08 PM

And if things follow precedent, a whole bunch of North Korean rocket experts are dead by now or wish they were. The ?who done it? purge is on. Maybe Kim?s bottle rockets need some tinkerin n? fixen but first the ?culprits? and ?class enemies? have to be identified and dealt with. Being involved with Kim's toys and ego trips is a mighty high risk bit of business.

Scamp

39mto39g · #5 07-06-2006, 03:04 AM

If you look into the US history of rockets you'll find many missfires, malfunctions even with the apolo program. It takes trial and error to have a working system, in anything.
I Think the US should reconsider its policy on assasination, A change in leadership is in order. without an invassion.
Ron

Seascamp · #6 07-06-2006, 10:29 AM

Sure enough, lots of blow-ups. Got in on the USN ?Terrible T?s? called Thalos, Tarter and Terrier. Solid fuel AA missiles and the news was only half good if they got off the launch rails without a fuel blow-up. All were beam riders and if they jumped the fire control beam, no telling which way they would go, including right back at ya. Who ha, had that happen once and the Tarter came back right between the stacks at about MK 1 speed, now that?ll make one feel mortal. :ek:

The most reliable was the Thalos and takin down a 125-mile distant target was no big deal. The expanding ring warhead really chopped m? up right proper, poof, and never had a fuel blow-up, but they sure cooked the launcher. Like the whole launcher and missile room blast doors rendered right back to bare metal and lookin real crispy critter ugly.

Scamp