The anti-FREEDOM & LIBERTY Crowd
First-off, I say: "Srew Peter Arnett and hang (literally and physically) the traitorous bum and enemy-supportive propagandist. Such ilk deserve no better,...and any other references made here are solely about some Fellow American NOTABLES.
Realistically though, NOTABLES are the only ones in America TRULY ABLE to use, abuse and/or take advantage of Our Free Speech, a world rarity. After all, the overwhelming vast majority here have only Dear Editor Letters and such to be heard. Plus, any writers of such know full well that total censorship or being greatly edited, sanitized and/or politically-corrected is quite common, so whoop-woopy-do, and so much for OUR Free Speech.
So, and since quite puzzling to me, I thought that some of you Patriots could answer some questions that truly need answering.
:cd: Why do The Baldwin, Sarandon and Sheen types take the side of and support Our murderously-fanatical enemies, rather than championing the freeing and liberating of The Iraqi People, as most sane Americans do? Do "They" hate The Iraqi People that much? Plus, have "They" already forgotten: "9/11"?
:cd: Why do the political: "Rangle" types here also take the enemy's side and/or The French, German, Russian, anti-America, pro-foreign and all quite similar Party Lines? Is WHOM ARE IN POLITICAL CONTROL that much more important freeing and liberating The Iraqi People from such a murderous regime?
:cd: Why is it that some American Feminist anti-war protestors don't get as similarly OUTRAGED (their norm) when an Iraqi Woman was hung by Iraqi fighters (in reality cowardly murderers), merely for waving in a friendly manner towards her Coalition Liberators?
:cd: Or, why don't The Feminists (all other anti-war protestors also) just as vehemently protest when Iraqi Forces fire on Iraqi men, women and children, while trying to escape from a Battle Zone,...such as "They" do so well against: "God, Duty, Honor, Country" and the The Freedom and Liberation of Iraq?
Regardless, and even though the words: "Politics" and "Foolish fanatical ideologues" pretty-much cover these questions as most other troubling questions in America my Friends,...let's see if some of you can't be a little more creative than that.
Looking forward to some beauties.
Neil
|