The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General > Political Debate

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-03-2006, 06:09 AM
SuperScout's Avatar
SuperScout SuperScout is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Out in the country, near Dripping Springs TX
Posts: 5,734
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default Anti-terrorist legislation

The House yesterday approved President Bush's proposal for the handling of terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, bringing the administration one step closer to having the legal authority to interrogate and prosecute the detainees.

"These terrorist tribunals will allow the suspected terrorists to address the charges against them with legal defense provided by the U.S. government," House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, Illinois Republican, said after the vote. In a mostly party-line 253-168 vote, Republicans backed the bill by a 219-7 margin and Democrats opposed it by a 160-34 margin. The House's one independent voted "no." The measure now goes to the Senate.

Just before voting, Majority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, made clear that Republicans will use the vote in the November elections against Democrats who opposed the bill. "Will my Democrat friends work with Republicans to give the president the tools he needs to continue to stop terrorist attacks before they happen, or will they vote to force him to fight the terrorists with one arm tied behind his back?" he said.

Republican leaders were quick to criticize Democrats who voted against the legislation. "Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and 159 of her Democrat colleagues voted today in favor of more rights for terrorists," Mr. Hastert said. "So, the same terrorists who plan to harm innocent Americans and their freedom worldwide would be coddled if we followed the Democrat plan."

Pelosi spokeswoman Jennifer Crider decried "Speaker Hastert's false and inflammatory rhetoric," calling it "yet another desperate attempt to mislead the American people and provoke fear. "Democrats will not be swift-boated," she said, referring to ads that hurt Democrats' 2004 presidential candidate, Sen. John Kerry. "We want [terrorists] punished, [Da dims are still thinking that terrorism is a criminal justice problem, not a war thing!] whatever that punishment is, and don't want it overturned by the Supreme Court. This bill may make it more likely the Supreme Court will overturn those convictions and may put our troops at greater risk." [Madam, can you explain how this might happen?]

The proposal would grant terror suspects more legal rights than they had under the system of military tribunals set up by the administration after the September 11 attacks, which the Supreme Court struck down in June. [Thanks again to liberal justices.] Nevertheless, the new courts would not grant many of the basic rights Americans usually have in civilian and military courts, a point Democrats protested. [The obvious is lost on da Dims: terrorists are not ENTITLED to the basic right Americans have, nor should they be.]

"This bill is everything we don't believe in," said Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, Ohio Democrat. [Well, what do you Dims believe in?]

Rep. Barney Frank, Massachusetts Democrat, said the proposal doesn't provide enough checks and balances to prevent erroneous convictions. [Let's see: a terrorist is captured on the battlefield with an AK-47 or RPG or IED in his hands. He gets tried by a military tribunal. He is convicted of being a terrorist. How much of a possibility or 'erroneous conviction' can there be?]

Other provisions opposed by Democrats give the president broad authority to decide which techniques U.S. interrogators can use legally. [It's called the authority of the Commander-in-Chief. You ain't it. Get over it.]

American interrogators and prosecutors, Mr. Frank said, "are the good guys, but they're not the perfect guys."

The House vote took place shortly after Democrats and Republicans in the Senate reached an agreement to take up the measure with only a handful of amendments. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist told reporters that he hoped to pass the bill today without any of the amendments being approved, so it could go directly to Mr. Bush's desk for his signature. Mr. Frist said voters will side with those who support the tribunals. "People realize it's a new world," said Mr. Frist, Tennessee Republican. "We need to have appropriate tools."
__________________
One Big Ass Mistake, America

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oregon legislation 39mto39g General Posts 2 03-16-2007 04:57 PM
Democrats have introduced legislation 39mto39g General Posts 4 03-11-2007 07:09 PM
Moment of Truth (For the Anti-American Left)..from veteran of Vietnam anti-war times MORTARDUDE General Posts 0 03-31-2003 05:48 AM
Important Disability Legislation David Veterans Benefits 0 04-26-2002 08:40 AM
Important Disability Legislation David Veterans Concerns 0 04-26-2002 08:31 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.