![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() >Subject: Re: Another Wannabe Exposed
>From: "Dave Thompson" davethompson@ask.forit >Date: 9/6/2003 11:19 PM Central Daylight Time >Message-id: <%ky6b.49141$nf3.47422@fed1read07> > > >"Exposingwannabes" >news:bje23i02e5p@drn.newsguy.com... >> I have exposed yet one more Wannabe who has made claims that he served two >tours >> in the US Army in Vietnam. Although he was not even born until 1951, he >claims >> to have been a US Army advisor in Vietnam! The following is the message >ID >> number and the quote which proves that he is a wannabe. He claimed that >the US >> Army never called any E-4s, Specialist Forth Class! >> >> Absolutely NO ONE who was ever in the US Army during the Vietnam War could >make >> such a glaring error! This man is a phony! >> > >Well, now. YOU may have called SP4's Specialist Fourth Class, but the >official designation was Specialist 4, commonly known as "Spec 4". The rank >structure created in 1955 under AR 615-15 created the grades of Specialist >1st Class (E6), Specialist 2nd Class (E5) and Specialist 3rd Class (E4). > >In 1958, the pay grades of E8 and E9 were added and the Specialist grades >were designated as follows: > >Specialist 4 (E4) Spec 4 >Specialist 5 (E5) Spec 5 >Specialist 6 (E6) Spec 6 >Specialist 7 (E7) Spec 7 >Specialist 8 (E8) Spec 8 >Specialist 9 (E9) Spec 9 > >The grades Spec 8 and 9 were never used extensively and were dropped in >1965. In 1978 Spec 7 was discontinued and personnel holding that grade were >given a lateral promotion to Sergeant First Class. Finally, the grades of >Spec 5 and 6 were dropped in 1985. > >I enlisted in the Army in July, 1961 and was a Spec 4, Spec 5, Staff >Sergeant, WO1, CW2, 2LT, 1LT and Captain and never heard of Spec 4's being >referred to as Specialist 4th Class. > >I could be mistaken, but I doubt it. > >-- >Dave >(The Other) > There was an unofficial Specialist 4th Class rank that my old Top Shirt called the "Command" Spec 4. It was usually reserved for the Troop clerk and I have known the old man to giveth this rank as well as take it away when said Spec 4 became too commanding. "LT, you know we've been pretty good to old so and so and today he got a little smart with me. I think he might need some fresh air." "As you wish, First Sergeant". Bill Clarke |
Sponsored Links |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In article <0lumlvspk1kbqc0puh57jocqkvl971poi5@4ax.com>, Patrick t. says...
> >On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 11:44:52 -0400, Outgoing V. Incoming > > >>Dean Shultis, >>For the rest of you, these carefully selected clips are all imported >>from soc.sex.general, a discussion group for all things relating to >>intimacy. > >Isn't that an oxymoron, sybul and intimacy? Whats he doing over >there, learning to give the Retriever a hot date? Is it intimate for a minister to fuck his girlfriend in the ass while worrying about shit getting shoved up his dick? Is it intimate for a reverend to watch a porn star over and over squirt cum in someone's mouth? Is it intimate for a pastor to ponder over the pros and cons of whether a woman should shave before he sucks her vagina? The above questions are moot now because Lee R. Parsons of Plymouth Massachusetts is no longer practicing any ministry and he has wisely gone to professional counseling. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() >Subject: Re: Another Wannabe Exposed
>From: Exposingwannabes Exposingwannabes_member@newsguy.com >Date: 9/7/2003 8:02 AM Central Daylight Time >Message-id: > >"Specialist Fourth Class" was officially used by the US Army > and was universally spoken as such by all soldiers. It is to larf! You num-nutted fucker did you ever get out of the city limits of Saigon? >You are a wannabe! > I don't think so dickhead. He speaks the language, you don't. Bill Clarke |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In article
> > ![]() > >Includes 1540 hits, to include many official Army (.mil) sites, Medal Of >Honor citations (and I sure think that these would reflect the correct rank >if nothing else), etc. > >HTH, > >Marty Exactly! Thanks, Marty |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Voice Of Reason"
news:bjg11d02kdr@drn.newsguy.com... > > You idiot! Can't you read? It is a list of acceptable abbreviations. Go back > and read it again and if you can't understand what it says then ask some little > kid down the street. If you don't know how to run a search engine, some 3 year > old child will be glad to help you. Just type in Specialist Fourth Class and > see how many hits you get. I saw a lot of MOH recipients listed as Specialist > Fourth Class. Maybe you should call them up tell them they are wannabes because > you were a Captain and you know more than millions of other vets. > > Lee Parsons had gotten a burr up his butt and denigrated a vet because he wrote > Specialist Fourth Class. For you to even hint that Specialist Fourth Class is > not acceptable makes you the laughing stock of all military newsgroups and web > sites. > I know, I know... the rest of the world is wrong and YOU are right... > > Jerk! > > SP4 is the acceptable abbreviation for Specialist Fourth Class. Get over it! I > know you got out on a medical discharge but I wasn't aware it was mental. > Thanks for proving it to me... > I can now depart this thread. I knew if I poked you with a stick long enough you would eventually admit you are Dean Shultis, Certified Wacko, Wachula, Florida. Before I go, please read back through the thread since I joined. I never once said Specialist Fourth Class is not "acceptable', whatever that means in your pea brain. I contended and showed Army references that it was never an official title of rank. You do continue to be a Putz, don't you? Why don't you come back to awv as yourself? -- Dave (The Other) |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In article <4q3nlvsoucbsq3cnmtc46j3p5qih4b0pqo@4ax.com>, Outgoing V. Incoming
says... > >On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:41:32 -0500, "BigRedWingsFan" > > >> >> ![]() >> >>Includes 1540 hits, to include many official Army (.mil) sites, Medal Of >>Honor citations (and I sure think that these would reflect the correct rank >>if nothing else), etc. >> >>HTH, >> >>Marty > > >A simple Google search of Specialist Four (in quotes) brings 3,180,000 >hits. Nonsense! If anyone believes Lee Parsons, just type in "Specialist Four" (in quotes) on Google and see if you get 3,180,000 hits. Then you will see the liar that he is. One of the hits for "Specialist Four" on Google is probably Lee Parsons' favorites: http://www.ronspenispills.com/cpa100...500:1093209899 "penis enlargement capsules surgical penis enhancement specialist penis enlargement capsules surgical penis enhancement specialist. Answer feels enlargement free penis picture penile enhancement SPECIALIST FOUR old. ..." |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In article
> >I can now depart this thread. Don't let the door slam you in the ass as you leave... >Before I go, please read back through the thread since I joined. I never >once said Specialist Fourth Class is not "acceptable', whatever that means >in your pea brain. I read all your shit. Including this crap: __________________________________________________ ________________________ Sure, "Specialist Fourth Class" will return gobs of hits on the internet. The trouble is none of them are Official U.S. Army sites. They are personal narratives and such. Even those at VA Cemetery and National Guard sites have clearly been written by family, not the Army. __________________________________________________ ________________________ You can look through hundreds of US Army unit web sites and they will list Specialist Fourth Class. You can look through dozens of web sites showing rank designations and they will say Specialist Fourth Class. I had heard Specialist Fourth Class during the entire 3 years I was in the Army. Virtually every Commissioned and Non-commissioned Officer and Enlisted men that I knew in the Army said Specialist Fourth Class. You can spout your little regs all day and all night but all you are going to hear is silence... Fool! |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Whenever I wanted to fuck with someone's head, I'd ask a question and
say, "Thank you, sepcialist," to the reply. .... and I usually wanted to fuck with someone's head. Jones |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Voice Of Reason"
> > If anyone believes Lee Parsons, just type in "Specialist Four" (in > quotes) on Google and see if you get 3,180,000 hits. > Well I figured I'd follow your suggestion with Google.....and the following post just kinda popped up....out of nowhere..... "dino" news:9ifp6502n66@drn.newsguy.com... < snip > > I also read where you called and left a message. If you did - I never > got it. If it was a girl, it probably was one of my daughter's friends > who NEVER gives me my messages. > Actually there are so many people coming and going sometimes I think > my house is a public toilet... > |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 23:46:42 +0100, "Buzz Lightyear"
>Well I figured I'd follow your suggestion with Google.....and the following >post just kinda popped up....out of nowhere..... Surprise, surprise. > >"dino" >news:9ifp6502n66@drn.newsguy.com... > >< snip > > >> I also read where you called and left a message. If you did - I never >> got it. If it was a girl, it probably was one of my daughter's friends >> who NEVER gives me my messages. >> Actually there are so many people coming and going sometimes I think >> my house is a public toilet... >> > > |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Democrat Scheme to Win Election Exposed! | zuni_rocket | Political Debate | 1 | 08-17-2006 04:22 PM |
TSA Airport 'Security' Exposed as a Farce Again | urbsdad6 | Political Debate | 3 | 03-06-2006 09:33 PM |
Pres FDR - Exposed to 2-butoxyethanol? | Margaret Diann | General Posts | 1 | 05-02-2005 03:14 AM |
Veterans exposed to ionizing radiation | sfc_darrel | Veterans Concerns | 0 | 06-23-2002 08:38 PM |
Wannabe? | Packo | Vietnam | 35 | 05-13-2002 09:01 AM |
|