Another Wannabe Exposed

In article , Exposingwannabes says...
>>Lessee, in 1972 I was 21 years old, and assigned to MACV Advory Team 1
>>in I Corps, RVN. Yeah, I guess I was old enough, wouldn't you?
>
>No.


(Again) Why not?

Voice Of Reasoning wrote:
> In article , Dave Thompson says...
>
>>I just love the old dino habit of sliding one in when you think no one
>>is looking.
>
>
> I love it too. Remember what you said:
>
> "I can now depart this thread."
>
> So, depart already... You'll live through it...
>

The operative word was 'can' not 'must'.

Anger Management counseling is available in Wachula.

--
Dave
(The Other)

In article , Dave Thompson says...
>
>Voice Of Reasoning wrote:
>> In article , Dave Thompson says...
>>
>>>I just love the old dino habit of sliding one in when you think no one
>>>is looking.
>>
>>
>> I love it too. Remember what you said:
>>
>> "I can now depart this thread."
>>
>> So, depart already... You'll live through it...
>>
>
>The operative word was 'can' not 'must'.
>
>Anger Management counseling is available in Wachula.
>
>--
>Dave
>(The Other)

Dave (The Other Idiot) said:
"I'll give you one shot because you just aren't worth any more effort."

That was about 5 posts back. Can't give it up, can you? You just can't admit
that I'm right.
I am in no way angry. Thank you. Seems you and wannbe Lee Parsons are angry
though. Lee is threatening to sue me. Nothing new there.
Goodnight.

On 7 Sep 2003 07:36:11 -0700, A Voice Of Reason
wrote:

>An ex-Vietnam vet (possibly) claimed he was a minister. He has been posting
>recently to newsgroups as "Outgoing V. Incoming" and his name is Lee Parsons.
>
>Lee wrote:
>"am a minister"
>"many of us pastors"
>"Rev. Lee"
>"I've studied the history of organized religion for the last four Years"
>
>At the time he was claiming to be a man of God, he was saying that he was having
>____ sex with his significant other:
>
SNIP snip SNIP
>He was also enjoying porn movies, especially of men:
SNIP SNIP SNIP
>In a discussion about oral sex, Lee discusses the difference of whether a woman
>should shave or not:
>"Sometimes it's nice just because it's *different*. Variety and
>experimentation are important."
>When someone asked about having sex with disabled persons, Lee responded with
>much personal experience:
>"Sure. It's great, just like sex with anyone else. It can present little
>challenges and sometimes takes some adjustment and imagination, but it can be
>wonderful."
>In a discussion about sexual fondling, Lee asserts:
>"My experience has been that when developing a new relationship, women very much
>appreciate me asking, "May I?" Some laugh and say of course, but most have said,
>"Thanks, I appreciate your asking."
SNIP SNIP
******************* *********
I guess I am naive but I have no idea why you would so indulge
yourself as to bring the above topic into the Newsgroup, as it
has absolutely nothing to do with the military or the original
discussion pertain to Spec-4...
HOWEVER, having worked in the medical field for a little bit of
time, and known some people who had temporary and more permanent
disabilities, I would imagine that the response Mr. Parsons made
about being intimate with someone having a disability was rather
thoughtful.
Along with that, his comments about fondling, about asking his
partner as to what enhances the experience for them, was also
very thoughtful.
All in all, I have very little trouble with what Mr. Parson is
supposed to have posted on a completely different Newsgroup.
What he posted has very little to impinge upon the topics
supposedly discussed in the military newsgroup, and absolutely
nothing to do with the original discussion pertaining to the
Spec-4 messages.
His comments and thoughtful answers, even the one with a bit of
humor, do not diminish his standing.
UNFORTUNATELY, your standing, for indulging yourself in bringing
this up in an effort to tarnish someone who challenged a
statement made, certainly reduces your standing...
---Mac

In article , Outgoing V. Incoming
says...
>
>On 6 Sep 2003 20:06:32 -0700, Exposingwannabes
> wrote:
>
>>Not when Lee Parsons professes to own over 100 books about the Vietnam War
>
>I do?

I don't know, do you? You wrote this:

"My own library contains hundreds of works about Vietnam"

You do remember writing that don't you, Schizo?

"FatmanE" wrote in message
news:20030908173844.18170.00000656@mb-m24.aol.com...
> >Subject: Re: Another Wannabe Exposed
> >From: "Ted Gittinger" tgittingerbounce@austin.rr.com
> >Date: 9/7/2003 8:39 PM Central Daylight Time
> >Message-id:
> >
> >
> >"Exposingwannabes" wrote in
> >> Lee Parsons (aka Outgoing V. Incoming) made fun of a real Vietnam vet
> >because he
> >> said he was a Specialist Fourth Class. Lee Parsons is a wannabe. If
you
> >wish
> >> to stand behind wannabes, that is your choice.
> >
> >Sure thing, Studmuffins.
> >
> >ted
>
> Studmuffins! You old dog you!
>
> Bill Clarke

You remember "Eyebeam?" My fave was the one named Lance Trousers.

ted

On 8 Sep 2003 08:41:17 -0700, Voice Of Reasoning
wrote:

>In article , Outgoing V. Incoming
>says...
>>
>>On 6 Sep 2003 20:06:32 -0700, Exposingwannabes
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Not when Lee Parsons professes to own over 100 books about the Vietnam War
>>
>>I do?
>
>I don't know, do you?


Of course I know, and no, I don't own hundreds... anymore.


You wrote this:
>
>"My own library contains hundreds of works about Vietnam"
>
>You do remember writing that don't you, Schizo?


That was years ago. Do try to live in the present. You read something
on Google from the mid-90s and think it's still current?