A Sniper with 20 Clips???????????

On 22 Sep 2003 0515 -0700, Alligator Al
wrote:

>In article , Pepperoni says...
>>
>>
>>"Ken" wrote in message
>>news:33osmvc6mtrn65rvdtvdrpmtm6ts95t81e@4ax.com...
>>> Taped mag's were a big thing at one
>>> time, as were loading them with 18 rounds.
>>
>>You could tape 6-8 magazines together, but some folks didn't like to see
>>it. The mags on the bottom (pointing down) could become fouled with dirt
>>or mud. Some types liked taping a lot of mags together for ease of carry
>>when it was time to scramble. Truckers, bulldozer operators and guys on the
>>perimeter bunkers at night liked having the ammo all in one place with the
>>rifle.
>
>Nailed his ass good!!!


Would you like to quote a Post where anyone said they taped their's,
your reading comprehension is at an all time low.
" Taped Mag's were a big thing at one time, as were loading them with
18 rounds"
Really hope you're able to read this but also that your little mind is
able to comprehend.

While we're on the subject of comprehension, would you care to tell us
about your job as a Police Officer for a major civilian Police
Department. Your shield number was? The department you worked for was?
The state that certified you was?
I think you've lied so much you can no longer remember what you said
( a Google search would help you re-fresh). Your creditability is
also slipping to an all time low ( if you ever had any ).

BTW - Isn't it about time to crawl back into your bunker and pull a
sand bag over your head.

Ken
11 Bravo

In article , Ken says...
>
>On 22 Sep 2003 0515 -0700, Alligator Al
> wrote:
>
>>In article , Pepperoni says...
>>>
>>>
>>>"Ken" wrote in message
>>>news:33osmvc6mtrn65rvdtvdrpmtm6ts95t81e@4ax.com...
>>>> Taped mag's were a big thing at one
>>>> time, as were loading them with 18 rounds.
>>>
>>>You could tape 6-8 magazines together, but some folks didn't like to see
>>>it. The mags on the bottom (pointing down) could become fouled with dirt
>>>or mud. Some types liked taping a lot of mags together for ease of carry
>>>when it was time to scramble. Truckers, bulldozer operators and guys on the
>>>perimeter bunkers at night liked having the ammo all in one place with the
>>>rifle.
>>
>>Nailed his ass good!!!
>
>
>Would you like to quote a Post where anyone said they taped their's,
>your reading comprehension is at an all time low.
>" Taped Mag's were a big thing at one time, as were loading them with
>18 rounds"
>Really hope you're able to read this but also that your little mind is
>able to comprehend.

Big thing where? Hollywood? You've seen so many movies you can't separate fact
from fiction...

Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk...

>While we're on the subject of comprehension, would you care to tell us
>about your job as a Police Officer for a major civilian Police
>Department. Your shield number was? The department you worked for was?
>The state that certified you was?

Are you still whining about that? Shit that's been years ago... Go back to the
original post and see the context in which it was written. We were discussing
military. I mentioned "civilian" police so people wouldn't get confused with
military police... folks on this ng get really, really, really confused...

Its right on my DD-214: "Early Separation For Police Work"

You figure out where...

>I think you've lied so much you can no longer remember what you said
>( a Google search would help you re-fresh). Your creditability is
>also slipping to an all time low ( if you ever had any ).

Ask someone who cares...

>BTW - Isn't it about time to crawl back into your bunker and pull a
>sand bag over your head.

Don't have no bunkers or M-16s or military shit hanging on my walls. That was a
looooonnnnng time ago... Don't mean nothin'...

>Ken
>11 Bravo

>Anyone remember being told to bang the freshly loaded mag against
>something to seat the rounds, Old Wives tale or not ?

I don't remember being told that, but I remember that I did it because I saw
someone else do it at the Keesler AFB, MS range where we received M-16 training
(we had M-14's prior to that -- training courtesy of USMC - Camp LeJeune, NC).
It made sense to me . . . as long as you hit the back of the mag, not the
front!

And I sure do remember that red dirt. We called it laterite. Hard as a rock
when dry; clingy slop when wet.



"Vene! Vene! Vene!" -- Viagras the Elder

On 22 Sep 2003 06:57:31 -0700, Alligator Al
wrote and lied:

Well in closing let me say one thing, you're a Lying Sack of Shit,
you're unable to separate fact from fiction. You've been unable to
justify anything you posted in this group for years, you're unstable
and need to seek professional help from a competent Doctor, this may
help with your delusions.
You need only to answer the questions in regard to your time as a
Police Officer which can be easily verified, this would give you some
creditability, as your creditability is zero.
BTW - Where did you buy that DD-214?

Ken
11Bravo
>
>Big thing where? Hollywood? You've seen so many movies you can't separate fact
>from fiction...
>
>Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk...
>
>>While we're on the subject of comprehension, would you care to tell us
>>about your job as a Police Officer for a major civilian Police
>>Department. Your shield number was? The department you worked for was?
>>The state that certified you was?
>
>Are you still whining about that? Shit that's been years ago... Go back to the
>original post and see the context in which it was written. We were discussing
>military. I mentioned "civilian" police so people wouldn't get confused with
>military police... folks on this ng get really, really, really confused...

I'm not confused in the least, the questions are real clear, it's the
answers that are not forthcoming.
Again, Name the State that certified you, your Shield Number and the
Department you worked for.

>Its right on my DD-214: "Early Separation For Police Work"
( Don't mean nothin )

>You figure out where...
I have, you lied.......again.

>>I think you've lied so much you can no longer remember what you said
>>( a Google search would help you re-fresh). Your creditability is
>>also slipping to an all time low ( if you ever had any ).
>
>Ask someone who cares...
>
>>BTW - Isn't it about time to crawl back into your bunker and pull a
>>sand bag over your head.
>
>Don't have no bunkers or M-16s or military shit hanging on my walls. That was a
>looooonnnnng time ago... Don't mean nothin'...
>
>>Ken
>>11 Bravo

"Alligator Al" wrote in message
news:bkmm7o031bu@drn.newsguy.com...
>
> Your "gen-u-wine" M16A1 is not the same rifle that I used. Neither is the
ammo.
> I was a rifleman and you are stepping into my territory. If you would
have used
> the early M-16s with issued ammo, you could not have fired less than 2
rounds
> with the selector on auto. Check out the following web sites. They
explain it
> in detail:
>
> http://www.mst2-vietnam.info/Stoner_...notes/M-16.htm
> http://mwilson.hypermart.net/views/guns/m16.html
>
> Your rifle is only firing at at about 600 to 700 rounds per minute...
probably
> at the same rate as the M-60 machine gun...
>
> DIPSHIT!
>

Ahhh! The last word in Web Crawling. How long did it take you to dredge up
your citations?

"Stepping into your territory" is a laughable bit of chest puffing. Are you
now telling us that you were the only person in Viet Nam to expend vast
amounts of ammunition during your tour? Even my cook on the boat probably
shot more than you and I'll GUARANTEE he didn't dump any ammunition over the
side.

You are right about one tiny little thing. My rifle is different than the
one you used. It has a chrome bore, round front hand guard and bird cage
flash suppressor. Woop-tee-fucking-doo. I carried an M16A1 on my first
tour in 1967. That's where I learned to pull that stupid little stunt.

Since I bought the rifle in 1982, it has probably spent more time on the
range than your entire tour.

Thanks for the Stage Three message.

--
Dave
(The Other)

In article , Ken says...
>
>On 22 Sep 2003 06:57:31 -0700, Alligator Al
> wrote and lied:
>
>Well in closing let me say one thing, you're a Lying Sack of Shit,
>you're unable to separate fact from fiction. You've been unable to
>justify anything you posted in this group for years, you're unstable
>and need to seek professional help from a competent Doctor, this may
>help with your delusions.
>You need only to answer the questions in regard to your time as a
>Police Officer which can be easily verified, this would give you some
>creditability, as your creditability is zero.
>BTW - Where did you buy that DD-214?
>
>Ken
>11Bravo

Ebay...

Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk...

In article , Dave Thompson says...
>
>
>"Alligator Al" wrote in message
>news:bkmm7o031bu@drn.newsguy.com...
>>
>> Your "gen-u-wine" M16A1 is not the same rifle that I used. Neither is the
>ammo.
>> I was a rifleman and you are stepping into my territory. If you would
>have used
>> the early M-16s with issued ammo, you could not have fired less than 2
>rounds
>> with the selector on auto. Check out the following web sites. They
>explain it
>> in detail:
>>
>> http://www.mst2-vietnam.info/Stoner_...notes/M-16.htm
>> http://mwilson.hypermart.net/views/guns/m16.html
>>
>> Your rifle is only firing at at about 600 to 700 rounds per minute...
>probably
>> at the same rate as the M-60 machine gun...
>>
>> DIPSHIT!
>>
>
>Ahhh! The last word in Web Crawling. How long did it take you to dredge up
>your citations?
>
>"Stepping into your territory" is a laughable bit of chest puffing. Are you
>now telling us that you were the only person in Viet Nam to expend vast
>amounts of ammunition during your tour? Even my cook on the boat probably
>shot more than you and I'll GUARANTEE he didn't dump any ammunition over the
>side.
>
>You are right about one tiny little thing. My rifle is different than the
>one you used. It has a chrome bore, round front hand guard and bird cage
>flash suppressor. Woop-tee-fucking-doo. I carried an M16A1 on my first
>tour in 1967. That's where I learned to pull that stupid little stunt.
>
>Since I bought the rifle in 1982, it has probably spent more time on the
>range than your entire tour.
>
>Thanks for the Stage Three message.
>
>--
>Dave
>(The Other)

Hey guy,
I admitted that I was wrong about artillery not being able to hit on the other
side of a mountain, so why the ego trip? I was right about the rifle that I had
and I don't hear people screaming at me because I said that it was impossible to
fire one round from an M-16 while it was switched to auto. All I hear is one
lonely voice from a guy with an M-16A1 with an improved buffer to slow down the
cyclic rate.
I dumped my M-16 for an M-14 during my first tour and carried only an M-14
during my second tour... The M-14s that I used never malfunctioned and I used
20 rounds per magazine. Heavier - yes. Better - I thought so... At least the
damn things worked... Did you get any mud on your boat?

Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk...

Alligator Al wrote:
>
> Hey guy,
> I admitted that I was wrong about artillery not being able to hit on the other
> side of a mountain, so why the ego trip? I was right about the rifle that I had
> and I don't hear people screaming at me because I said that it was impossible to
> fire one round from an M-16 while it was switched to auto. All I hear is one
> lonely voice from a guy with an M-16A1 with an improved buffer to slow down the
> cyclic rate.
> I dumped my M-16 for an M-14 during my first tour and carried only an M-14
> during my second tour... The M-14s that I used never malfunctioned and I used
> 20 rounds per magazine. Heavier - yes. Better - I thought so... At least the
> damn things worked... Did you get any mud on your boat?
>
> Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk...
>

What ego trip? You are the pinhead that said " I was a rifleman and you
are stepping into my territory." clearly indicating that no one but you
has or had intimate knowledge of personal weapons used in Viet Nam.

Did I get mud on the boat? Hell, yes. All those 9th Infantry troopers
in the Delta left a hell of a mess. If it were over a couple of hours
back to Dong Tam I even let them take showers. We just hosed the deck
down with fire hoses after they debarked. Up north the Marines tended
to drag a lot of sand and dirt aboard, unless of course it was cold and
raining. Then it became mud.

Your point? Oh, yes. I forgot. The above is a classic Stage Three
message.

To refresh the reader, the various stages of Dean Shultis'
correspondence falls into five major categories.

Stage One: I was there and I know everything.
Stage Two: You are a fucking liar! What I think I saw was the only
truth in Viet Nam.
Stage Three: You are a wannabe! You obviously were not there.
Stage Four: You were a murdering Officer/NCO/REMF/Marine/etc/etc.
Stage Five: I am leaving this newsgroup never to return.

Oh, yeah. Throughout stages one through five sprinkle a few Nyuk, nyuks
liberally to indicate your wit.

It really must suck to be you.

--
Dave
(The Other)

>It really must suck to be you.

Dave,

Still LMAO

Best Regards

Greg

"GrgLnsctt" wrote in message
news:20030922133735.28250.00000001@mb-m21.news.cs.com...
> >It really must suck to be you.
>
> Dave,
>
> Still LMAO
>
> Best Regards
>
> Greg

Heh! I think Dean believes he is one of those 'kick me' dolls that keeps
bobbing back when punched. In his mind as long as he keeps bobbing back up
he is winning.

--
Dave
(The Other)