The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Military News > Navy

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2020, 06:14 AM
Boats's Avatar
Boats Boats is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sauk Village, IL
Posts: 21,784
Arrow Look At This Picture Very Closely (It Means the U.S. Navy Has a Problem)

Look At This Picture Very Closely (It Means the U.S. Navy Has a Problem)
By: James Holmes - National Interest - 01-26-20
Re: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/bu...problem-116681

Look at this picture: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/bu...problem-116681

A RUST PROBLEM - THAT IS. (I spotted that right away - Boats)

Key point: Washington must project an appearance of power that includes clean and spiffy warships. Rust and other ugly appearances makes America look weak and incompetent.

The U.S. Navy has a diplomatic problem. It’s a problem that stems from the most mundane of failings: neglect of vessels’ outward appearance. The amphibious assault ships USS Boxer and Fort McHenry put into the seaport of Kiel, Germany not long ago in a disreputable state. Rust streaked their sides for all to see. The destroyer USS Gravely, one of America’s frontline Aegis surface combatants, operated alongside allied ships in a likewise parlous condition.

How much effort should go into keeping up appearances is a running debate for seafarers everywhere. Sailors hate scraping and painting. It feels like drudgery visited on them by officers bent on currying favor with higher-ups who visit the ship. Cynics suspect their superiors of trying to win promotions, plum job assignments, or medals from visitors favorably impressed by the look of the command. They mutter darkly, channeling Murphy’s Laws of Combat, that no combat-ready unit has ever passed a peacetime inspection.

Such wisecracks betray a conviction that there’s a zero-sum contest between keeping a vessel looking sharp and practicing seamanship, tactics, and kindred technical endeavors that are crucial to routine operations and battle effectiveness. In other words, every minute spent burnishing appearances is a minute not spent on what truly matters.

And for sure, it is possible to take the pursuit of spit-and-polish to excess. Just about any virtue degenerates into vice beyond a certain threshold. Bear in mind, though, that it is human nature to rally to a likely winner while spurning a likely loser. How do people distinguish between the two in peacetime? Combat is the arbiter between superiority and inferiority, yet no missiles or gunfire fly around in peacetime—supplying unequivocal proof of who outmatches whom.

That leaves appearances. Naval forces strive to impress audiences domestic and foreign, friendly, hostile, or indifferent. These observers have few indicators apart from a ship’s appearance to judge its crew’s seamanship, technical acumen, and battle proficiency. So scraping and painting is about more than routine upkeep, or maintenance budgets. The look of a ship has strategic if not political import. It is critical to the war of perceptions.

But outward appearances matter even more than it might seem. While holding forth on the dynamics of peacetime naval diplomacy, strategist Edward Luttwak maintains that whoever most observers believe would have prevailed in a wartime trial of arms tends to prevail in a peacetime showdown. Naval practitioners could render an informed judgment about each contender’s prospects in action. Spit-and-polish might be a secondary concern for them.

Most beholders, however, are not specialists in naval affairs. Yet their opinions count all the same. A tidy, rust-free appearance suggests to landlubbers that the crew knows and cares about its business. If a warship looks like a rusty old hulk, contrariwise, it’s reasonable for onlookers to conjecture that its internals—its propulsion plant, sensors, and armament—may likewise be objects of neglect. Its image for professionalism and battle competence suffers.

If the U.S. Navy projects a slovenly appearance while, say, China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy shows up in a foreign harbor looking spick-and-span, guess who seems like the trustworthy friend and fearsome foe? Advantage: China. Diplomatic influence goes to mariners mindful of the fundamentals.

Nor, it bears saying, are the great unwashed altogether wrong to judge a fleet by its look. Corrosion is an antagonist that can be managed and subdued but never finally defeated. Journalist Jonathan Waldman reviews engineers’ perennial struggle against it in his book Rust, aptly subtitling it The Longest War. It nearly brought down the Statue of Liberty during the 1980s. Manufacturers make extravagant efforts to tame it when, say, canning soda. And it afflicts ships ceaselessly. After all, a hull is a ferrous metallic box floating in seawater. Put iron in contact with saltwater and corrosion soon follows unless sailors stay constantly on the attack.

One imagines Bradley Fiske would nod knowingly at the U.S. Navy’s diplomatic plight. A century ago Admiral Fiske wrote a treatise portraying The Navy as a Fighting Machine. Any piece of hardware, from a humble water pump or electrical generator to a stately fighting ship, has certain maximum performance characteristics. However, it may underperform its design parameters because of the human factor. “When thinking or speaking of the power of any instrument,” he writes, “we mean the power of which it is capable; that is, the result which it can produce, if used with 100 per cent of skill.”

Yet few human beings achieve perfection. Deficits in operator training or experience handicap equipment performance. Technicians may be overworked or apathetic. In any of these cases, materiel will produce only a fraction of its design output. Human frailty degrades combat excellence.

Luttwak notes that weapon systems are “black boxes” to outsiders until used in action. With scant direct evidence of which naval force boasts the best black boxes—with no verdict of arms that yields a definite result—friends and allies, prospective antagonists, and domestic constituents will render a verdict based on the evidence of their eyes. Rust and slipshod housekeeping are telltale indicators that something deeper is amiss.

The balance of appearances, then, could favor even a lesser but spiffy-looking competitor. So let’s get the U.S. Navy fleet looking shipshape again—and restore our standing in the eyes of friend, foe, and bystander alike. The mundane is important.

By: James Holmes is J. C. Wylie Chair of Maritime Strategy at the Naval War College and author of the forthcoming Brief Guide to Maritime Strategy. The views voiced here are his alone. This first appeared earlier in 2019.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Personal note: Being a ABF-2-Boatswain - for 12 years - I know rust! Each and every department on a ship is responsible for it's work space. That means everything!! Above deck and below decks (or top to bottom for you civvies).

Chiefs inspections were daily - if not ship shape you were written up and detailed to clean it up. Even at sea or even on the line - you had better keep your work space clean.

Everything above the water line had to be ship shape. Once you left the line you were charged with your duty spaces to make sure everything was checked and any failed inspections would cost you your liberty at port.

It's to be expected that "steel" ships will RUST and no matter what "it will RUST" again and again. Grind to bare metal, coat with red led and repainted back to grey.

When in port those on duty would be assigned to work details and that could be chipping paint, grinding down rusted areas from the waterline up. Red leading the surface and repainting the ships outer gray like color. These were always being worked on by the ships Divisional Personnel & all Boatswain-Mate's 24/7.

From decking to railings to work-spaces to equipment maintenance. 24/7 the ship was always under watch for any oil or fuel leakage, potential fire hazards, loose gear not tied down, aircraft maintenance, deck hands would work from the Shaft Alley up to the Mast. The Duty Officer or X0 would check every space and sign off - It's Ok or "Do It Again" (with - I'll be back - comments).

Chiefs would knock the crap out of you if you failed more than one inspection. Extra details and many other things Chief's can think up to ruin your day. Plus if one guy screws up the whole division screws up and that meant (a possible wet blank for the guy who didn't comply).

In port those on duty hung over the side to scrape and clean the hull from the waterline up. The hull got attention during dry dock operations. Even our living quarter's had to be ship shape - rules are rules and extra duty for screw ups were common. The ship is your home and - you keep your home clean - at all times.

That would also go for morning inspections & role call - topside. If you're not squared away - you got written up - and more extra duties. Shoes, your cloths and you're general appearance were always targets.

When on the line it was a little more lax because of the 24/7 watches and battlestations.
Watches were 24/7 and spaces were checked 4x per your shift at every station you were responsible for. Leakage of fuel or oil or water must be reported and logged a clean up team is sent to fix the issues and log in the repairs made. The (OOD) Officer Of The Day, Div. Officer & or Duty Officer - would inspect all repairs and also sign off on the log his inspection - time and date.

So it goes - you learn by doing and doing what right for the ship and it's crew so the ship can complete it's mission.

Ah ya gotta love what you do! The Grey Ladies always needed attention after all they are you homes. So you gotta take care of them "Ladies" and they will bring ya home.

Boats
__________________
Boats

O Almighty Lord God, who neither slumberest nor sleepest; Protect and assist, we beseech thee, all those who at home or abroad, by land, by sea, or in the air, are serving this country, that they, being armed with thy defence, may be preserved evermore in all perils; and being filled with wisdom and girded with strength, may do their duty to thy honour and glory; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

"IN GOD WE TRUST"
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.