The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General > General Posts

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-12-2019, 12:48 PM
HARDCORE HARDCORE is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,462
Distinctions
Contributor 
Question A Mob Of Terrorists Indeed

6-12-2019

When one of our former national leaders referred to “Our Founding Fathers” as just a mob of terrorists, I fully expected all Hell to break loose! After all, I reasoned, who in their right mind, and with a full pair of testicles, could ever just sit back and have the likes of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry and Ben Franklin (just to mention a few), called just a mob of terrorists?

Once again, “These Magnificent National Heroes” were (and are) the stuff of legends and pride, something that this current crop of panty-wasted, purely political tripe, regardless of their political affiliations, could never even hope to approach in their best day - save for that rare exception (or two) who are usually maligned and vilified by creatures to whom self is their one and only concern (opinion)!!

The problem is, however, that far too many of us are more political party than patriot these days! And even if we know for a fact that something works and is functional, we can usually be led around by the nose, instead of standing solidly upon our own two feet and espousing our very own beliefs, and not just some party line?

So answer me this: “Where are we all going to go when the same brand of fools who ruined “Old Europe” do the same thing - right here within The United States of America?” And yes, it can and is happening again, and this, because a few of us are not vigilant, courageous and even patriotic enough!”

“The United States of America” must be for our own true nation-loving citizens first! Protect it, let it never again be maligned or threatened (not even from within), or just maybe – “Stand the Chance of Someday Losing It All Forever!”

“AND THIS JUST HAD TO BE SAID - IF ENOUGH OF YOU STILL EVEN CARE THAT IS!!”

Hardcore
__________________
"MOST PEOPLE DO NOT LACK THE STRENGTH, THEY MERELY LACK THE WILL!" (Victor Hugo)
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 06-12-2019, 02:49 PM
Boats's Avatar
Boats Boats is online now
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,655
Default ARTICLE: Nation TITLE: Is the Constitution Suspended? AUTHOR: Thomas A. Burzynski

ARTICLE: Nation / TITLE: Is the Constitution Suspended?
AUTHOR: Thomas A. Burzynski - 1996
RE: https://www.constitution.org/pub/nam6205a.htm

In recent years, an ever-increasing number of alarming rumors have been paraded before Americans concerning their nation's future. Fears of United Nations forces in Montana, a concentration camp in downtown Indianapolis, and black helicopters everywhere are but a few of the sensational stories that have been spread through talk radio, the Internet, and tabloid newspapers.

The most recent addition to this maelstrom of false alarms offers the theory that the U.S. Constitution has been suspended since 1933 through a declaration of national emergency by President Franklin Roosevelt. This alarming assertion is being promoted chiefly by Dr. Eugene Schroder, a Colorado veterinarian, through his book Constitution: Fact or Fiction. According to a biography provided by his publisher, Dr. Schroder "uncovered the use of emergency powers to set aside the Constitution" several years ago and has been investigating the situation ever since. Dr. Schroder's efforts to publicize the issue have been boosted by interviews in the Spotlight and Anti-Shyster publications as well as through appearances on talk-radio programs.

Dr. Schroder has apparently influenced others. Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America (GOA), endorsed and recommended Dr. Schroder's work, declaring that "America needs to read this book!" GOA has released a video, Enemy Public Number One, which mirrors the arguments of Dr. Schroder. Likewise, the Republican Party of Texas, the nation's largest state Republican party, issued a resolution claiming that the Constitution has been suspended and calling for its restoration. John Tello, a member of the executive committee of the Texas Republican Party and the primary backer of the resolution, told The New American, "Dr. Eugene Schroder worked with us." Seemingly, these groups have taken Dr. Schroder's theory as fact without checking the accuracy of the information on which it is based.

RE: The Schroder Theory:

According to Schroder, the foundation for the current crisis was laid on October 6, 1917 with the passage of the Trading With the Enemy Act. This act gave the President the power to regulate, during time of war, all financial transactions involving any "individual, partnership, or body of individuals residing within any nation with which the U.S. is at war." On March 9, 1933, five days after Roosevelt's inauguration and four days after he had declared a national emergency, Congress passed the Emergency Banking Act, which amended the Trading With the Enemy Act to include regulation of transactions not only with the enemy but also between Americans during time of war or national emergency.

Since FDR had already declared a national emergency to deal with the bank "crisis," this unconstitutional legislation immediately gave the President much of the confidence he needed to launch the economic segment of his "New Deal" agenda. The result, of course, was an assault on the traditional form of American government and the free enterprise system under which America had flourished. FDR's declaration of a national emergency has never been terminated and has been joined by numerous other declarations of national emergency by subsequent presidents. Dr. Schroder cites this, as well as various government reports and laws, as "proof" that our nation has slipped into an "unconstitutional dictatorship." But as we shall see, he overlooks the fact that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and cannot be suspended or superseded via a law or presidential decree. In effect, he confuses violations of the Constitution with a suspension of the Constitution.

Fact and Fiction

RE: One piece of Schroder's documentation comes from a 1973 Senate report which ominously stated:

"Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency.... Under powers delegated ... [during a national emergency] the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens."

Aside from being unconstitutional, the level of tyranny described by this 22-year-old Senate report has never been reached. Harold Relyea, a specialist in American national government with the Congressional Research Service, explained to The New American: "The emergency declared in 1933 still exists as a matter of law but not as a matter of policy. It has never been terminated but all authority conferred by the declaration has gone into dormancy."

In his book Constitution: Fact or Fiction, Dr. Schroder contends: "The [U.S.] Constitution can be suspended by any president of the US who ascertains and proclaims a widespread territorial revolt." This claim, however, is not sustained by the Constitution itself, which is the sole legitimate source of federal power. The writ of habeas corpus, as specified in Article I, section 9, is the lone provision of the Constitution which may be suspended -- and even then, only in "cases of rebellion or invasion." Under the Constitution the writ could be suspended during a period of national emergency only if the national emergency in question were a "rebellion or invasion." As Relyea emphasized to The New American, "The Constitution has never been suspended."

So how does Schroder reach his conclusion in light of the Constitution? Largely by way of faulty research. For instance, one of the primary pieces of evidence he cites involves Title 12, Section 95(b) of the United States Code. Writes Schroder:

"[i]f we went to the library today and picked up a copy of 12 USC and went to section 95(b) ... we will find a law which states: 'The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subsection (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917 [Trading With the Enemy Act], as amended, are hereby approved and confirmed.' "

Schroder claims that this section of the U.S. Code means that everything the President or the Secretary of the Treasury has done since March 4, 1933 and anything that the President or the Secretary of the Treasury is hereafter going to do is automatically "approved and confirmed."

However, research reveals that Dr. Schroder is wrong. Doing as he suggests, this author went to the library, picked up a copy of Title 12 USC, and went to section 95(b), where he found the following:

"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by section 95a of this title, are approved and confirmed."

Looking in section 95(b) of USC Title 12, this writer found, in place of Dr. Schroder's reference to the 1917 Trading With the Enemy Act, a reference to "section 95(a) of this title." Section 95(a) refers only to a time of war, not to a period of national emergency. Dr. Schroder quoted from an outdated version of the U.S. Code.

In addition, the 1995 resolution passed by the Texas Republicans contains the very same error. John Tello told The New American that Schroder "became aware of the change in 1987." But Tello added that the change in this law is reflected neither in his resolution nor in Schroder's book because they both believe the government is still operating under the older phraseology.

RE: Ignoring the Constitution

The current emergency power supplied to the President and the Secretary of the Treasury by section 95(a) authorizes them to regulate America's banking system, even to order the closing of banks. But such powers are clearly unconstitutional on two counts: The Constitution contains no authorization for any federal authority to declare a national emergency, and it likewise contains no authorization for regulating or closing banks. The absence of such grants of power in the body of the Constitution are, of course, reinforced by the Tenth Amendment. Therefore, the Constitution cannot be suspended as Dr. Schroder believes. Instead, its fundamental limitations are being ignored and the power of the executive branch of government is being permitted to grow to ominous proportions.

Dr. Schroder makes another misstep when he cites the Trading With the Enemy Act. To buttress his claim that we live in a dictatorship brought on via the use of emergency powers, he cites the following portion of the act: "During time of war or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may ..." regulate to the point of prohibiting any transaction involving Americans. But even this portion of the act, though always unconstitutional, was amended in 1977 to read: "During time of war, the President may...." What was deleted from the original by the 1977 amendment, of course, is the reference to a "national emergency declared by the President."

In 1976 Congress passed the National Emergencies Termination Act, which specified that any national emergency not extended by the President on an annual basis will be automatically terminated. Also, the act recognized the power of Congress to terminate a national emergency. Schroder claims that the national emergency declared by FDR in 1933 was expressly exempted from this act. But he fails to note that this exemption was done away with one year later in a measure amending the Trading With the Enemy Act.

RE: Danger of Rumors

The rumor of a suspended Constitution represents only the latest in what has become a labyrinth of false trails and dead-ends, all with the potential to confuse and neutralize well-meaning conservatives. Mysterious executive orders prohibiting food hoarding, undue concern about yellow fringes around the American flag, and tales of Russian weather modification all damage the credibility of otherwise effective conservative activists. But the rumor that the Constitution has already been suspended delivers a double blow to the conservative movement since it is not only patently false, but is infecting good Americans with a sense of hopelessness. If the Constitution has been suspended, then constituent pressure on congressmen is useless, all checks and balances designed into our system of government no longer apply, and the government is incapable of safeguarding our God-given rights.

Fortunately, as long as the Constitution still stands, any government action that is based on extra-constitutional powers is ipso facto unconstitutional. What America needs are congressional declarations that expose as nullities all illegally usurped powers. (*) In addition, the people must learn to resist the distractions of the rumor mill and, instead, generate constant and informed vigilance lest their freedoms disappear at the hands of those who always claim that they mean to rule well, but who most of all mean always to rule.

END OF ARTICLE

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Personal note & comments:

(*) The asterisk seems to highlight the state of mind of the people when the President seems to be outside the box on decision making. This may or may not apply to our current President but the people are finding it hard to understand the process that happens with every new President. We can't deny that every President seems to step over a RED LINE which is unnerving to citizens. The Holy Grail of being an acceptable People's President is one that keeps his People informed with as little shock and awe as possible.

The Constitution has been our long standing guidelines - yet it has been altered many times from what I've read that doesn't really get to "all" peoples. Every Congress and the President work (at times together) along with the Supreme Court making tweets to the Constitution - whereas the People's of the United States are not readily informed as to the intricacies of these Constitutional tweaks. Here is where the non-legals begin to get nervous as they are not in the loop and can't foresee the ramifications of such Constitutional amendments. Written in law terms that many don't understand and yet get passed without the People's totally understanding what has taken place.

We all know that since the Constitution's conception many alterations or amendments have been written into our Constitution. Here is where the non-legal eagles (citizens) begin to misinterpret these alterations written in terms most don't understand. Authorities are given extra power to do things that the People don't necessarily have any input.

Government is always looking for ways to usurp the process but making misconstrued statements of what they are doing without the People's knowing its outcome. Good or Bad they can work their magic and "We The People" later find that they have the authority to do what they have to without our approval. Here's where everybody goes nuts because the jargon they use is a legal format - signed - sealed and delivered with all government officials approval - but not necessarily the People's knowing the governments motives and end results.

This is how I see government today. We the People put these folks into Government in hopes that things will be better for the whole not just the powerful.

Note: The Constitution is not Suspended - nor will ever be - but rather it's now a collage of legal jargon that most of us misinterpret - that's when all hell breaks out and a better definition of what's going on is needed.

HC - We care - "we all" care about our Country - though it may not look and sound like it at times. We've entered a stage of misconstrued subject matter that does ring hard for most of us to figure out - just what the hell is going on. It's we the people & those we put into Congress and the White House - that has to learn to work together or more Americans will take them out of office come re-election time.

Boats
__________________
Boats

O Almighty Lord God, who neither slumberest nor sleepest; Protect and assist, we beseech thee, all those who at home or abroad, by land, by sea, or in the air, are serving this country, that they, being armed with thy defence, may be preserved evermore in all perils; and being filled with wisdom and girded with strength, may do their duty to thy honour and glory; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

"IN GOD WE TRUST"
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.