Do Dems: "Walk The Walk" ALSO???

[reconeil]

Do Dems: "Walk The Walk" ALSO???
by N.R. Filidei (10/3/06 - commentary)

Seems to me that many Democrat Leaders (ex-Presidents Carter & Clinton inclusive) and their similarly obstructionist supporters of The Press/Media in general, are not all that necessarily sincere, forthright and honest with The People, even though apparently and quite echoing (quite deceivingly also) all: "Talk The Talk" politically, better than most.

Such mostly obvious when those alluded to Flag Waving and/or professing being unarguably PATRIOTIC, in their normally anti-America and pro everything foreign or foreigner absurd and strange ways. Realistically, such seem more so like phony UN Patriots and far from any TRUE American Patriots that I ever heard of. Regardless, let's get on with The Questions.

1. Even by the wildest stretch, can it be considered PATRIOTIC to both nationally and worldwide REPEATEDLY & ADNAUSEAMLY PROCLAIM (quite falsely I might add) that America's Wartime Commander-In-Chief and 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc., etc. in command (re. Republican Administration),...are all FLAT-OUT-LIARS & CANNOT BE TRUSTED, nor even given benefit of doubt every now and then???

Well of course not. TRUE patriotism never undermines and demoralizes both American and Allied Forces, Their Leader and any respective populations, by such obviously treasonable and/or enemy satisfying, gratifying, encouraging and/or helpful political ways.

Also, ONLY Our Despicable Islamic Terrorist Attackers and America's Leftist Underminers CAN TRULY APPRECIATE the quite sadly common (quite purposefully orchestrated also) political bull. Damn,...some-truly-sick-s--t and/or politics daily transpiring in The Good Old US of A These Wartime Days.

2. Even by another wildest of stretches, can it be considered PATRIOTIC of staunchly fanatical zealots or ideologues of Great Voice in America to continually and adamantly insist or pontificate that our borders MUST REMAIN pretty-much wide-open (both physically & by law),...merely for the purposeful political pandering of foreigners?

Though, and in fairness to both Political Parties always trying to increase their staunch (since beholding) minority or foreign national voter base by so politically pandering, does seems pretty-much a bipartisan effort. Also, doesn't seem mattering to politicos that even many: "Criminally Illegal Aliens" (correct INS nomenclature) called: "Terrorist Insurgents" also, no doubt have also registered to vote and now regularly vote for their benefactors in America. As absurd as such is,...why is such a blatant illegality so cavalierly encouraged and permitted??

Regardless, let's move on to the next question even though similarly mind-boggling and wondering why any such questions must even be asked in ANY SANE SOCIETY. Whatever, here goes even though pretty-much previously answered by the: "Purposeful political pandering of foreigners (legals or otherwise)" explanation.

Why-on-earth do so many Democrat Leaders and/or: "Darlings of The Press" in general and their greatly supportive journalists, all as one or in concert adamantly oppose The American Citizenry having a legitimate Identification necessary for all important matters, and especially FOR VOTING ,...and as most OTHER nations of The World already have and have had FOR QUITE SOME TIME?

Just try going ANYWHERE ELSE on earth without a passport or legitimate I.D. and attempt getting a legitimate Driver License THERE, some form or national assistance THERE, and even more absurdly try registering to vote and then voting, THERE. Just won't happen. Most nations on earth aren't nationally-suicidal, stupid, nor governed by overly-political or fanatical politicians.

In fact, jail or deportation (or both) are the most likely resolutions, since the most sensible and practical responses by any sane people. Some more wiser, astute and security conscious even treat such "Criminally Illegal Aliens" and/or clandestine criminal insurgents into country MUCH WORSE,...and especially during wartime.

Hell,...even Our Forefathers must be rolling over in their graves in total amazement at how America has retrogressed quite severely?

Must be saying words like: "Tis truly amazing Old Bean". "We couldn't be held in check nor display any obedience whatsoever towards Lords, Masters and Kings". "Whereas this New Breed of American bows, scraps and coweringly obey their HIRED & PAID FOR SERVANTS". "Are they all daft"? "We wouldn't even sit down and dine with Our Hired Servants much less ever do their bidding perpetually". "Blimey!!!,...What Utter Balderdash"!

The End

Neil
AKA: N.R. Filidei

[SuperScout]

To answer your question, all yu have to do is read the post I started about Anti-terrorist legislation. All the answers about who walks the walk is right there.

And to add to it, all gentle readers need to be reminded of the party that opposed the Patriot Act, who reveled in the revealings of the work of the NSA, and who think it's OK for the New York Times to publish secrets that bring harm and danger to America.

[reconeil]

Well stated, and good additional info exposing the quite
foreigner (here legally or otherwise) or foreign nationals-favoring
and MUCH MORE ENEMY HELPFUL than ever American Citizenry
HELPFUL: "Democrats/Socialists/Leftists...posing as Liberals",...
FOR WHAT THEY TRULY ARE. Dems just want Our Money.

Don't believe Democrat Campaign Bull.
Democrat Leaders & Wannabees will feign most anything (even well
known anti-America War Protesters will flag wave patriotically),
just to: "Recapture The White House (plus Congress)".

So then, I'll just quote myself again in hopes of getting some
blinded, duped or brainwashed political heads out of the sand.
"Damn,...some-truly-sick-s--t and/or politics transpiring in
The Good Old US of A These Wartime Days".

Hang all American pedophiles or suspected of such, and welcome
all foreign mass-murdering terrorist assassins whom can sneak
into America with open arms,...basically The Democrat Way.
Think Dems need to rearrange their priorities, a-tad-bit?
Not all voters are easily duped fools.

Neil

[Seascamp]

There is no law that states that the dragon has to win every day.



CINCINNATI ? The Bush administration can continue its warrantless surveillance program while it appeals a judge's ruling that the program is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The president has said the program is needed in the war on terrorism; opponents argue it oversteps constitutional boundaries on free speech, privacy and executive powers.

The unanimous ruling from a three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals gave little explanation for the decision. In the three-paragraph ruling, judges said that they balanced the likelihood an appeal would succeed, the potential damage to both sides and the public interest.

The Bush administration applauded the decision.

"We are pleased to see that it will be allowed to continue while the Court of Appeals examines the trial court's decision, with which we strongly disagree," Deputy White House press secretary Dana Perino said in a statement.

The program monitors international phone calls and e-mails to or from the United States involving people the government suspects have terrorist links. A secret court has been set up to grant warrants for such surveillance, but the government says it can't always wait for a court to take action.

[SuperScout]

Hooray for our side!

BTW: the historical precedent for that saying emanated from the crowds who lined the streets as Lady Godiva rode nude and sidesaddle.