|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Whether The Second Amendment Secures An Individual Right
WHETHER THE SECOND AMENDMENT SECURES AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm The Second Amendment secures a right of individuals generally, not a right of States or a right restricted to persons serving in militias. August 24, 2004 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Table of Contents Introduction The Unsettled Legal Landscape Textual and Structural Analysis "The Right of the People" "To Keep and Bear Arms" "A Well Regulated Militia, being Necessary to the Security of a Free State" Structural Considerations: The Bill of Rights and the Militia Powers The Original Understanding of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms The Right Inherited from England The Right in America before the Framing The Development of the Second Amendment The Early Interpretations The First Commentators The First Cases Reconstruction Beyond Reconstruction Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the Second Amendment secures an individual right to keep and to bear arms. Current case law leaves open and unsettled the question of whose right is secured by the Amendment. Although we do not address the scope of the right, our examination of the original meaning of the Amendment provides extensive reasons to conclude that the Second Amendment secures an individual right, and no persuasive basis for either the collective-right or quasi-collective-right views. The text of the Amendment's operative clause, setting out a "right of the people to keep and bear Arms," is clear and is reinforced by the Constitution's structure. The Amendment's prefatory clause, properly understood, is fully consistent with this interpretation. The broader history of the Anglo-American right of individuals to have and use arms, from England's Revolution of 1688-1689 to the ratification of the Second Amendment a hundred years later, leads to the same conclusion. Finally, the first hundred years of interpretations of the Amendment, and especially the commentaries and case law in the pre-Civil War period closest to the Amendment's ratification, confirm what the text and history of the Second Amendment require. Please let us know if we may provide further assistance. Steven G. Bradbury Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. Kevin Marshall Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General
__________________
|
Sponsored Links |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Individual Unemployability (IU) next 'target' of politicians?? | Gimpy | General Posts | 2 | 02-03-2006 03:29 PM |
Solomon Amendment | BLUEHAWK | Political Debate | 0 | 07-31-2005 04:57 AM |
Attorney secures medal, benefits for Navajo WWII vet | darrels joy | General Posts | 1 | 03-15-2004 08:25 PM |
C-rations ( The Meal, Combat, Individual ), ... TO&E official | MORTARDUDE | Vietnam | 6 | 05-05-2003 08:47 AM |
Second Amendment Ruling | JeffL | General Posts | 3 | 12-07-2002 09:28 AM |
|