The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Other Conflicts > Twenty First Century

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2011, 07:21 AM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Unhappy ISAF: Bringing Islamic Law to US Troops

ISAF: Bringing Islamic Law to US Troops

Posted by Diana West Mar 24th 2011 at 4:04 am in Afghanistan, Featured Story, Islam, Islamic extremism, Soldiers | Comments (15)
I wasn’t even looking for this. I just went to the ISAF website to see whether the grossly underreported weekend murders of two American soldiers (and shootings of four others) by an Afghan security contractor — again — was considered newsy enough to post by the official powers that be. “The slayings bring to nine the number of U.S. soldiers who have been killed by rogue Afghan security force members, whether uniformed or private security contractors, in the past two months,” NBC reports.

Nine? In the last two months? That whizzed by totally unaccounted for. Did any democratically elected officials even think to ask Gen. Petraeus about it?

I still don’t know if ISAF tallied up these latest bodies in a public count. That’s because the first item to present itself to a viewer of the ISAF site is this picture (above) with the caption: “Religious Importance of the Qur’an.” As a well-known sucker for the religious importance of the “Qur’an” — I prefer “Ko-ran,” with Texas inflection — I just had to click and see.

The caption tells us so-and-so holds his prayers beads during a March 2010ribbon-cutting ceremony on an electrification project in the Farah Distriction, quoting Mr. So-and-So as saying: “If we have electricity … we can turn on our lights, and read the Koran.”

What comment is appropriate here? “The jaw drops”? “The universe spins”? We must go beyond shock to assess the advanced state of psycho-masochism the US military has now attained under the suicidal ideology of COIN, a belief system of unparralleled arrogance that actually believes that a cockamamie scheme of sticks and carrots, at a staggering cost of blood (limbs, skull shards) and unrecoverable treasure, is adequate to remake Muslim Man in Petraeus’s Image.

But the joke is on the COINsters. For what is happening is that it is they who are remaking themselves. In seeking to win Islamic hearts and minds, a lynchpin of the non-military, social-work basis of the COIN strategy, they have themselves become de facto followers of Islamic law, and they are spreading it to our troops.

This is the ISAF site tells us. To wit:

“Download Religious Importance of the Qu’ran” the ISAF commands.

So I did. Up pops COIN Advisory # 20100924-001 (I’m not kidding).This perfectly rancid sop to “Cultural Sensitivity” (the non-ironic title) is something for US troops to gag themselves with. Literally. “Never talk badly about the Qur’an or its contents.” #2 “recommendation” says, a no-nonsense formulation of Islamic prohibitions against criticising Islam.

Remember, this COIN Advisory is attached to the very first item ISAF displays, hoisted like a flag of dhimmitude to denote ISAF’s adoption of Islamic law (sharia), illustrated with a year-old picture of Mr. Prayer Beads exulting over having received the technology of Thomas Alva Edison to read the Koran.

But if illuminating the Koran is perfectly okay for infidels to do, touching the thing is not. Why? “It is considered culturally insensitive for any non-Muslim to touch a copy of the Qur’an,” ISAF explains. Why that it is indeed the Islamic case, ISAF doesn’t mention. Perhaps it would upset still-not-completely dhimmified troops to learn that this injunction exists because Muslims consider non-Muslim “najis,” or unclean, and thus unfit to touch their religious book. We must appreciate the implications: Having accepted this basic supremacist divide, ISAF has also accepted dhimmitude, the cultural condition of all non-Muslim subjects of sharia, and it is imposing it on our troops.

Of course, there’s more:

Additionally, verbal disrespect for Islam and/or the Qur’an is considered as inappropriate as physical desecration of the Qur’an. Insulting the Qur’an is an act of blasphemy.

The way Islam treats women stinks = verbal disrespect for Islam. The verses of the Qur’an that call for jihad against infidels are heinous = insulting the Qur’an. Tut, tut: ISAF, veritable mouthpiece of the coming caliphate, deems such talk “inappropriate” and “blasphemy” — which just might win them an extra pillow at the foot of the caliph’s throne.


Furthermore:

Muslims believe they have an inherest duty to stand up to injustices committed against Islam and the Qur’an. Therefore, they take any perceived disrespect to Islam and/or the Qur’an extremely seriously….

Therefore, so does ISAF, which recommends:

1. Do NOT handle Qur’ans or other Islamic relgious items. (CAPS in the original.)

2. Never talk badly about the Qur’an or its contents.

3. If you must search a location or person’s belongings, ask them if they have a Qur’an or religious item present. If so, ask them to remove it or put it in a suitable place before conducting the search.

4. Your level of sensitivity must be even greater when conducting canine searches. [Dogs are also "najis."] Having an animal anywhere near a Qur”an or other religious artifact is considered highly disrespectful.

5. If you have questions about the Qur’an or Islam, ask respectfully.

6. Be informed and be prepared to answer questions about alleged desecration of the Qur’an.

This kind of thing has been going on a long time — too long. It’s past time to perk up and notice that our adopting the ways of Islam is in fact the objective of jihad.

http://bigpeace.com/dwest/2011/03/24...ps/#more-98016
__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 03-24-2011, 09:19 AM
reconeil's Avatar
reconeil reconeil is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Avenel, New Jersey
Posts: 5,967
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default Joy,

Given that American Military Lives will always be of infinitely more important than any Murderous Muslim Enemy Lives will ever be,...perhaps by merely changing one word defining ISAF might help.

AFGHANISTAN's International Security Assistance Force
being changed to
AFGHANISTAN's Islamic Security Assistance Force
should do the trick.

What could possibly be more Honest?

Isn't it obvious that only entity actually receiving any Dictated: "Assistance",...IS ISLAM?

Sure-as-hell seems Religiously Supremacist Dictatorial & obvious, to me.

The: "Ko-ran" is all important and U.S. Soldier Lives don't mean diddly???
And We U.S. Taxpayers PAY FOR THIS NONSENSE???

GET REAL U.S. Congress and/or Civilian Warlords & Paymasters!!! Concern & Respect of American People as typically done for Islam, would be a good start.

Pandering to American Christians & Jews (Israelis also) just as constantly done for Muslims both here & abroad (enemies or not),...couldn't hurt either. Wouldn't such also be: "FAIR"?


Neil
__________________
My Salute & "GarryOwen" to all TRUE Patriots.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ISAF Troops Provide Continuous Counter-IED Training to ANSF, Coalition Troops The Patriot General 0 02-23-2011 10:23 PM
Bringing the U.S. troops ... where? - Oak Ridger The Patriot Afghanistan 0 02-23-2011 06:23 PM
Robert Greenwald: Bringing Home 150 Troops From Afghanistan Would Fix ... - Capitol H The Patriot Afghanistan 0 02-19-2011 12:23 PM
Bringing Home 150 Troops from Afghanistan Would Fix Wisconsin's Budget â??Crisisâ?? - The Patriot Afghanistan 0 02-19-2011 09:23 AM
Nigerian troops kill 100 Islamic militants David Twenty First Century 0 07-30-2009 08:44 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.