The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Branch Posts > Marines

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2004, 02:50 PM
thedrifter thedrifter is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,601
Distinctions
VOM 
Cool Raise High the Caution Flag

Marine Corps Gazette
March Editorial: Raise High the Caution Flag

Marines have long been known for their ingenuity. Through many wars and smaller conflagrations they have shown their mettle by being able to adjust on the fly. So it was in the recent combat in Iraq. Marines adapted through the short-fused process of procuring new equipment for Marines in the combat zone; through prehostility organization for combat, such as the formation of the MEF engineering group and the Marine Logistics Command; and through the innovative use of forces onhand to complete assigned tasks (using a reconnaissance battalion as a maneuver element and forming a task force using all three light armored reconnaissance battalions to liberate Tikrit).


A potential problem that we have as an institution lies in the desire to capitalize on our successes, and in so doing we may well find ourselves preparing to fight the last war. We have task organized our forces for so long and so effectively that we risk losing sight that having a robust organization to task organize from is perhaps our greatest strength of all.


A case in point relates back to reconnaissance in Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM. During that conflict we found it difficult to employ dismounted reconnaissance elements in what was essentially a mechanized war in an area of operations with featureless terrain, against an enemy with fairly strong air defense assets?making it difficult to perform standard insertions and extractions. After the war the Corps decided that light armored vehicle units provided the best form of reconnaissance within the division, and ultimately we got rid of the division reconnaissance battalions. The unintended consequences for the Marine Corps in this questionable action was that it cost the Corps our primary source of ground dismounted reconnaissance experience, training management and supervision for those reconnaissance assets, and left a notably fragmented capability among the infantry regiments. It took us the better part of a decade to turn that questionable decision around.


Our recent experience in Operation IRAQI FREEDOM spawned a series of articles explaining how combat service support (CSS) was task organized to support the warfighting efforts of I MEF in Iraq. There was much attention paid to the formation of CSS groups to support elements of the MEF. There was additional discussion about the cumbersome organizations that are the peacetime force service support groups, to the effect that they are huge, unwieldy, and don?t lend themselves well to task organizing for combat. From the ?supported? side of the house, it might seem seductive to have one?s own permanent CSS group to train alongside and go off to combat together. No organizational decisions have been made to this point that I?m aware of, but the discussions are ongoing.


And here is where we ought to raise the caution flag. If we were to break up the current CSS organizations so that we are task organized for combat on a relatively permanent basis, then we have lost something substantial?that is the luxury of manning, training, and equipping our Marines in larger formations so that they can train to perform their mission essential tasks. If we break everything out structurally ahead of time, then just like the fragmented reconnaissance elements in the infantry regiment, we abandon the ability to provide a single point for training, maintaining, and preparing the force for combat. In sum, it?s easier to break big things down to smaller things and much harder to group small entities into larger cohesive units.


An analogy might be the way we organize Marine artillery. We send a firing battery out on a float with a deploying MEU, but heaven protect us if we ever think we can do away with artillery battalion and/or regimental headquarters. If such were the case, it would be virtually impossible to mass fires, and massing fires showcases the real strength and flexibility of Marine artillery.


Our Corps is blessed with great strategic, operational, and tactical minds. They need to work together, think things through to logical conclusions on what is best for the Corps, and obviate the necessity to keep raising high the caution flag.

http://www.mca-marines.org/Gazette/edt.html


Ellie
__________________
IN LOVING MEMORY OF MY HUSBAND
SSgt. Roger A.
One Proud Marine
1961-1977
68/69
Once A Marine............Always A Marine.............

http://www.geocities.com/thedrifter001/
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 03-16-2004, 07:03 PM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default

Ellie,

Thank you for continuing to post the Marine news. Your support of your Marine and all our military does not go unnoticed or un appreciated.

With prayers,

Joy
__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Daily Humor! - Caution!! SuperScout General Posts 1 03-05-2004 04:53 AM
Words of Caution!! SuperScout General Posts 3 01-26-2004 09:34 AM
Marine gave his life after helping raise flag on Iwo thedrifter Marines 0 12-02-2003 06:58 AM
George S. Patton's Speech to 3rd Army ..CAUTION... it is uncensored... MORTARDUDE World War II 0 05-25-2003 09:10 AM
Veteran learns high cost of flying flag thedrifter Marines 0 03-30-2003 06:16 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.