The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Veterans > Veterans Concerns

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-03-2004, 01:43 PM
HARDCORE HARDCORE is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,906
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default JUDGE DENIED DoJ MOTION TO DENY US AN EXTENDTION TO RESPOND

EVERYTHING I PUT UP ON THIS SITE HAS BEEN E-MAILED TO ME!!!

MRS. HARDCORE
________________________________________

Forwarded:

All,

This morning DoJ had filed an objection to our request on Monday for a two week timeframe to respond to the Dec 24th filing. The Judge just denied this request...which also effectively denies DoJ's ultimatum/deadline in its Dec 30th to vacate its order of injunctive relief by of Jan 6th.

Seems as if the Judge isn't going to be bullied by the Govt. The question now is whether the Govt will appeal his order below. Note that Judge has scheduled a hearing on Jan 14th.


Forwarded Message:

Subj: Activity in Case 1:03-cv-00707-EGS JOHN DOE et al v. RUMSFELD et al "Order on Motion for Extension of Time to"
Date: 12/31/2003 1:06:16 PM Eastern Standard Time
From:
To:
Sent from the Internet (Details)



***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.

U.S. District Court

District of Columbia

Notice of Electronic Filing


The following transaction was received from lcegs1, entered on 12/31/2003 at 12:51 PM EDT and filed on 12/31/2003
Case Name: JOHN DOE et al v. RUMSFELD et al
Case Number: 1:03-cv-707
Filer:
Document Number:

Docket Text:
MINUTE ORDER granting [20] Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time and granting [22] Defendants' Motion to Expedite Review of the pending motions. Plaintiffs shall file Responses to Defendants' Motion for Clarification or in the alternative for Reconsideration and Defendants' Motion to Vacate the Preliminary Injunction and for a Stay by no later than 4:00 p.m. January 9, 2004. Any Replies to the pending motions shall be filed by 4:00 p.m. January 12, 2004. The Court, sua sponte, schedules a Motions Hearing for all pending motions at 10:00 a.m. on January 14, 2004. Plaintiffs are excused from filing a Reply to their Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on December 31, 2003. (lcegs1, )

The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:



1:03-cv-707 Notice will be electronically mailed to:

Ronald James Wiltsie ronald.wiltsie@usdoj.gov

Mark S. Zaid zaidms@aol.com

1:03-cv-707 Notice will not be electronically mailed to:
__________________
"MOST PEOPLE DO NOT LACK THE STRENGTH, THEY MERELY LACK THE WILL!" (Victor Hugo)
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Survey On A Dangerous Middle East! All On Patriotfiles Are Requested To Respond HARDCORE General Posts 9 04-06-2007 05:25 AM
Security Council members deny meeting Kerry 1IDVET Political Debate 2 10-26-2004 04:02 PM
Air Passenger Code Plan In Motion David Homeland Security 0 04-18-2004 06:57 AM
IDEAS; How Can We Get Our Politicans To Respond Through The Media Using Our Compute travisab1 Political Debate 4 01-19-2004 10:13 PM
Black liberals need to respond to insult of Rice by Baraka MORTARDUDE General Posts 2 03-21-2003 12:56 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.