|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
JUDGE DENIED DoJ MOTION TO DENY US AN EXTENDTION TO RESPOND
EVERYTHING I PUT UP ON THIS SITE HAS BEEN E-MAILED TO ME!!!
MRS. HARDCORE ________________________________________ Forwarded: All, This morning DoJ had filed an objection to our request on Monday for a two week timeframe to respond to the Dec 24th filing. The Judge just denied this request...which also effectively denies DoJ's ultimatum/deadline in its Dec 30th to vacate its order of injunctive relief by of Jan 6th. Seems as if the Judge isn't going to be bullied by the Govt. The question now is whether the Govt will appeal his order below. Note that Judge has scheduled a hearing on Jan 14th. Forwarded Message: Subj: Activity in Case 1:03-cv-00707-EGS JOHN DOE et al v. RUMSFELD et al "Order on Motion for Extension of Time to" Date: 12/31/2003 1:06:16 PM Eastern Standard Time From: To: Sent from the Internet (Details) ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. U.S. District Court District of Columbia Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was received from lcegs1, entered on 12/31/2003 at 12:51 PM EDT and filed on 12/31/2003 Case Name: JOHN DOE et al v. RUMSFELD et al Case Number: 1:03-cv-707 Filer: Document Number: Docket Text: MINUTE ORDER granting [20] Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time and granting [22] Defendants' Motion to Expedite Review of the pending motions. Plaintiffs shall file Responses to Defendants' Motion for Clarification or in the alternative for Reconsideration and Defendants' Motion to Vacate the Preliminary Injunction and for a Stay by no later than 4:00 p.m. January 9, 2004. Any Replies to the pending motions shall be filed by 4:00 p.m. January 12, 2004. The Court, sua sponte, schedules a Motions Hearing for all pending motions at 10:00 a.m. on January 14, 2004. Plaintiffs are excused from filing a Reply to their Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on December 31, 2003. (lcegs1, ) The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: 1:03-cv-707 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Ronald James Wiltsie ronald.wiltsie@usdoj.gov Mark S. Zaid zaidms@aol.com 1:03-cv-707 Notice will not be electronically mailed to:
__________________
"MOST PEOPLE DO NOT LACK THE STRENGTH, THEY MERELY LACK THE WILL!" (Victor Hugo) |
Sponsored Links |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Survey On A Dangerous Middle East! All On Patriotfiles Are Requested To Respond | HARDCORE | General Posts | 9 | 04-06-2007 05:25 AM |
Security Council members deny meeting Kerry | 1IDVET | Political Debate | 2 | 10-26-2004 04:02 PM |
Air Passenger Code Plan In Motion | David | Homeland Security | 0 | 04-18-2004 06:57 AM |
IDEAS; How Can We Get Our Politicans To Respond Through The Media Using Our Compute | travisab1 | Political Debate | 4 | 01-19-2004 10:13 PM |
Black liberals need to respond to insult of Rice by Baraka | MORTARDUDE | General Posts | 2 | 03-21-2003 12:56 PM |
|