The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General > General Posts

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-21-2004, 10:36 AM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Cool Whether The Second Amendment Secures An Individual Right

WHETHER THE SECOND AMENDMENT SECURES AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
The Second Amendment secures a right of individuals generally, not a right of States or a right restricted to persons serving in militias.

August 24, 2004

MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Table of Contents

Introduction

The Unsettled Legal Landscape


Textual and Structural Analysis


"The Right of the People"


"To Keep and Bear Arms"


"A Well Regulated Militia, being Necessary to the Security of a Free State"


Structural Considerations: The Bill of Rights and the Militia Powers


The Original Understanding of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms


The Right Inherited from England


The Right in America before the Framing


The Development of the Second Amendment


The Early Interpretations


The First Commentators


The First Cases


Reconstruction


Beyond Reconstruction


Conclusion


For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the Second Amendment secures an individual right to keep and to bear arms. Current case law leaves open and unsettled the question of whose right is secured by the Amendment. Although we do not address the scope of the right, our examination of the original meaning of the Amendment provides extensive reasons to conclude that the Second Amendment secures an individual right, and no persuasive basis for either the collective-right or quasi-collective-right views. The text of the Amendment's operative clause, setting out a "right of the people to keep and bear Arms," is clear and is reinforced by the Constitution's structure. The Amendment's prefatory clause, properly understood, is fully consistent with this interpretation. The broader history of the Anglo-American right of individuals to have and use arms, from England's Revolution of 1688-1689 to the ratification of the Second Amendment a hundred years later, leads to the same conclusion. Finally, the first hundred years of interpretations of the Amendment, and especially the commentaries and case law in the pre-Civil War period closest to the Amendment's ratification, confirm what the text and history of the Second Amendment require.

Please let us know if we may provide further assistance.

Steven G. Bradbury
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Howard C. Nielson, Jr.
Deputy Assistant Attorney General

C. Kevin Marshall
Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General
__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Individual Unemployability (IU) next 'target' of politicians?? Gimpy General Posts 2 02-03-2006 03:29 PM
Solomon Amendment BLUEHAWK Political Debate 0 07-31-2005 04:57 AM
Attorney secures medal, benefits for Navajo WWII vet darrels joy General Posts 1 03-15-2004 08:25 PM
C-rations ( The Meal, Combat, Individual ), ... TO&E official MORTARDUDE Vietnam 6 05-05-2003 08:47 AM
Second Amendment Ruling JeffL General Posts 3 12-07-2002 09:28 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.