The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Other Conflicts > Cold War

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2019, 09:55 AM
Boats's Avatar
Boats Boats is online now
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,613
Arrow After Trump’s treaty withdrawal, NATO is getting ready for a Russia with a lot more m

After Trump’s treaty withdrawal, NATO is getting ready for a Russia with a lot more missiles
By: Tara Copp Military Times
RE: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/y...more-missiles/

BRUSSELS — Moscow still has six months to come back into compliance with the INF treaty — but NATO is already planning for a future that includes a “Russia with more missiles.”

President Donald Trump announced earlier this month that the U.S. was withdrawing from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, citing Russia’s development of the 9M729 - SSC-8 ground based cruise missile, which could deliver nuclear warheads and whose estimated 500 to 5,500 kilometer range would violate the INF treaty.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that right now, the main focus “is to preserve the treaty,” adding that the withdrawal process will not complete until August. "At same time,” Stoltenberg said, “we are planning for future without an INF treaty and Russia with more missiles.”

However, in a background briefing with reporters, a NATO official acknowledged that there was no consensus yet on what the alliance will do if Russia does not destroy the missiles, launchers and associated training equipment.

“If after six months they take no steps back toward compliance ... we just have to continue to think about what this means for deterrence and to do everything we deem necessary to ensure the peace,” the NATO official said.

At a press conference Wednesday, Stoltenberg said the 29 NATO members were assessing options on a response.

Under the terms of the treaty, Russia can still retain the research labs and data associated with the missile, including prototypes, the official said.

“We don’t require them to set fire to their plants … erase their memories or anything like that,” the NATO official said. “It’s the physical stuff."

A senior US official traveling with Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan told reporters that the U.S. is only considering providing additional conventional weapons to assist in the defense of NATO if the treaty does fail.

The NATO official said those options are still premature.

“The U.S. has stated clearly they are looking at different options in terms of medium-range missiles,” the official said. “As to whether or not they need to be put in Europe, that is not even a question we are looking at" right now, the official said.

Likening the INF treaty to a failed relationship, the NATO official suggested those options could be part of the discussion in the future as it gets ready for post-INF treaty world.

“When your partner has left you for someone else, you don’t say, well, ‘Marriage is cool, this is great.’ At some point you say, 'I think we’re divorced!’”

About the writer: Tara Copp is the Pentagon Bureau Chief for Military Times
__________________
Boats

O Almighty Lord God, who neither slumberest nor sleepest; Protect and assist, we beseech thee, all those who at home or abroad, by land, by sea, or in the air, are serving this country, that they, being armed with thy defence, may be preserved evermore in all perils; and being filled with wisdom and girded with strength, may do their duty to thy honour and glory; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

"IN GOD WE TRUST"
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.