The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2004, 03:58 AM
James Monroe
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default ‘Smoking Microfiche’ says, ‘AWOL’





That slimy little drunken weasel was indeed A.W.O.L.


An excerpt from the article:

The bulk of the comment lately swirls around the "pay records" the
White House claims prove Bush completed his obligation. A few people
sent copies of "The Smoking Microfiche," which questions whether the
released documents are, in fact, pay records, and whether they prove
anything.

The verdict: They aren’t. They’re a record of "retirement points," a
separate matter. The essay also claims the "new" document White House
spokesman Scott McClellan "revealed" last week was published four
years ago on the Web site www.democrats.com.

A second document, torn and only partly legible, may be a pay record.
Since part of it is missing and no one seems to know who issued it,
that’s hard to determine.

If it’s legitimate, though, Smoking Microfiche author Bob Fertik said,
it has a serious flaw from the GOP perspective: Bush’s last date of
pay was April 16, 1972. The only entries after that date are on April
31, June 31, Sept. 31 and Nov. 31. Since those are all 30-day months,
and the entries all say 99 . . . these are ‘placeholder’ numbers, not
pay dates for duty served.

The bottom line is clear: Bush was never paid for service during the
time he claims to have been on duty (White House records do indicate
that he showed up early in 1973 for a government-paid dental exam).

http://www.rgj.com/news/stories/html...sp3=Columnists




Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 02-15-2004, 06:10 AM
Matt Osborn
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default Re: ‘Smoking Microfiche’ says, ‘AWOL’

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:58:59 -0800, James Monroe
wrote:

>
>
>
>
>That slimy little drunken weasel was indeed A.W.O.L.
>


Name one date when Bush was required to report and failed to do so.

Required is the operative here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-15-2004, 09:18 AM
Offen Rong
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default Re: 'Smoking Microfiche' says, 'AWOL'


"James Monroe" wrote in message
news:adnu2050hd1c05k51idkqlv424bmuq6ird@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
> That slimy little drunken weasel was indeed A.W.O.L.
>
>
> An excerpt from the article:
>
> The bulk of the comment lately swirls around the "pay records" the
> White House claims prove Bush completed his obligation. A few people
> sent copies of "The Smoking Microfiche," which questions whether the
> released documents are, in fact, pay records, and whether they prove
> anything.
>
> The verdict: They aren't. They're a record of "retirement points," a
> separate matter. The essay also claims the "new" document White House
> spokesman Scott McClellan "revealed" last week was published four
> years ago on the Web site www.democrats.com.
>
> A second document, torn and only partly legible, may be a pay record.
> Since part of it is missing and no one seems to know who issued it,
> that's hard to determine.
>
> If it's legitimate, though, Smoking Microfiche author Bob Fertik said,
> it has a serious flaw from the GOP perspective: Bush's last date of
> pay was April 16, 1972. The only entries after that date are on April
> 31, June 31, Sept. 31 and Nov. 31. Since those are all 30-day months,
> and the entries all say 99 . . . these are 'placeholder' numbers, not
> pay dates for duty served.
>
> The bottom line is clear: Bush was never paid for service during the
> time he claims to have been on duty (White House records do indicate
> that he showed up early in 1973 for a government-paid dental exam).
>
>

http://www.rgj.com/news/stories/html...sp3=Columnists
>
>

Now that President Bush has released his military records, lets see what the
military records show for the other candidates.


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2004, 09:21 AM
Carla Lamp
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default Re: ?Smoking Microfiche? says, ?AWOL?

Why do you hate America? Questionning the President's patriotism is
criminal sedition. I am forwarding your post to Homeland Security.

James Monroe wrote in message news:...
> That slimy little drunken weasel was indeed A.W.O.L.
>
>
> An excerpt from the article:
>
> The bulk of the comment lately swirls around the "pay records" the
> White House claims prove Bush completed his obligation. A few people
> sent copies of "The Smoking Microfiche," which questions whether the
> released documents are, in fact, pay records, and whether they prove
> anything.
>
> The verdict: They aren?t. They?re a record of "retirement points," a
> separate matter. The essay also claims the "new" document White House
> spokesman Scott McClellan "revealed" last week was published four
> years ago on the Web site www.democrats.com.
>
> A second document, torn and only partly legible, may be a pay record.
> Since part of it is missing and no one seems to know who issued it,
> that?s hard to determine.
>
> If it?s legitimate, though, Smoking Microfiche author Bob Fertik said,
> it has a serious flaw from the GOP perspective: Bush?s last date of
> pay was April 16, 1972. The only entries after that date are on April
> 31, June 31, Sept. 31 and Nov. 31. Since those are all 30-day months,
> and the entries all say 99 . . . these are ?placeholder? numbers, not
> pay dates for duty served.
>
> The bottom line is clear: Bush was never paid for service during the
> time he claims to have been on duty (White House records do indicate
> that he showed up early in 1973 for a government-paid dental exam).
>
> http://www.rgj.com/news/stories/html...sp3=Columnists

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-15-2004, 10:22 AM
Lee
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default Re: ?Smoking Microfiche? says, ?AWOL?

On 15 Feb 2004 0902 -0800, carla_lamp@hotmail.com (Carla Lamp)
wrote:

>Why do you hate America? Questionning the President's patriotism is
>criminal sedition. I am forwarding your post to Homeland Security.
>



"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only
unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
public."
-Theodore Roosevelt from 1918 Wartime Essay: Lincoln and Free
Speech




Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2004, 10:53 AM
GW Chimpzilla
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=91Smoking_Microfiche=92_says=2C_=91AWOL=92?=

James Monroe wrote:

>
>
>
>
> That slimy little drunken weasel was indeed A.W.O.L.
>
>
> An excerpt from the article:
>
> The bulk of the comment lately swirls around the "pay records" the
> White House claims prove Bush completed his obligation. A few people
> sent copies of "The Smoking Microfiche," which questions whether the
> released documents are, in fact, pay records, and whether they prove
> anything.
>
> The verdict: They aren’t. They’re a record of "retirement points," a
> separate matter. The essay also claims the "new" document White House
> spokesman Scott McClellan "revealed" last week was published four
> years ago on the Web site www.democrats.com.
>
> A second document, torn and only partly legible, may be a pay record.
> Since part of it is missing and no one seems to know who issued it,
> that’s hard to determine.


Check out Calpundit.com He's been following the story and has gotten hold of a
complete version of the torn document, which is NOT a pay stubb.
>
> If it’s legitimate, though, Smoking Microfiche author Bob Fertik said,
> it has a serious flaw from the GOP perspective: Bush’s last date of
> pay was April 16, 1972. The only entries after that date are on April
> 31, June 31, Sept. 31 and Nov. 31. Since those are all 30-day months,
> and the entries all say 99 . . . these are ‘placeholder’ numbers, not
> pay dates for duty served.
>
> The bottom line is clear: Bush was never paid for service during the
> time he claims to have been on duty (White House records do indicate
> that he showed up early in 1973 for a government-paid dental exam).
>
> http://www.rgj.com/news/stories

html/2004/02/14/63970.php?sp1=rgj&sp2=Opinion&sp3=Columnists

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-15-2004, 03:03 PM
kw
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default Re: ‘Smoking Microfiche’ says, ‘AWOL’

In article ,
nospam@lessspam.net says...
> That slimy little drunken weasel was indeed A.W.O.L.


What is AWOL is honesty from you anti-American terrorist
lovers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-15-2004, 03:46 PM
Charlie Wolf
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default Re: ‘Smoking Microfiche’ says, ‘AWOL’

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:58:59 -0800, James Monroe
wrote:

>
>
>
>
>That slimy little drunken weasel was indeed A.W.O.L.

No - he wasn't . But you are added to the list of lying little
fucking liberal weasels...
Regards,

snipped...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-15-2004, 03:58 PM
Sharky
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default Re: ?Smoking Microfiche? says, ?AWOL?

In alt.war.vietnam, Lee says...

>On 15 Feb 2004 0902 -0800, carla_lamp@hotmail.com (Carla Lamp)
>wrote:
>
>>Why do you hate America? Questionning the President's patriotism is
>>criminal sedition. I am forwarding your post to Homeland Security.
>>

>
>
>"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
>we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only
>unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
>public."
> -Theodore Roosevelt from 1918 Wartime Essay: Lincoln and Free
>Speech


Teddy was right! How someone can be charged with "criminal sedition" by
questioning ANYONE about ANYTHING is beyond me (OK, so there is a chance
that by questioning someone about certain "prohibited acts", that you might
be considered a criminal, but questioning whether the President is
patriotic is NOT one of them.)

--
Sharky - who believes George W Bush is far more patriotic than the Clinton
scum (Bill and Hillary) and John "F'ing" Kerry.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.