The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General > Political Debate

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2008, 09:29 AM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default Supreme Court Votes IN FAVOR OF VOTER FRAUD

Supreme Court Votes IN FAVOR OF VOTER FRAUD



The Supreme Court Just Ruled in Favor of the Ohio Secretary State saying that she does NOT have to turn over the 200,000 names of the Funky ACORN registrants and their info to local voting boards:



FOX The U.S. Supreme Court agreed with Democratic Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, granting her a stay on Friday to a temporary restraining order from the 6th Circuit Court that ordered her to provide a system for implementing voter fraud prevention methods.



The decision by the full court repudiates the lower court's ruling siding with the Ohio Republican Party and ordering Brunner to verify records of about 200,000 of 666,000 new voters this year whose driver's license and Social Security records don't match information in other government databases.



Hedging her bets, Brunner filed a motion late Thursday night asking the federal appeals court to extend or modify an earlier order to come up with a system to help counties verify voter eligibility.



Circuit Court Judge George Smith set the completion time for Brunner to come up with a method for validating mismatched voter registration data at midnight Saturday. Brunner, who filed a request for a stay of the order with the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday, asked for a two-week extension so she could be compliant if the high court didn't see her way.



The Ohio Republican Party filed the initial suit challenging the state's compliance with the Help America Vote Act, alleging that the state has no system to deal with mismatched voter records.



On Tuesday, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati sided with the GOP. Brunner responded with an appeal to the high court.



In its reply brief to the Supreme Court, the Ohio GOP said if Brunner needed relief from the temporary restraining order then she should seek it from Smith, who issued the ruling.
__________________________________________________ __

What value will our votes have if Obama wins and more liberal judges are put on the Supreme Court?
__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 10-17-2008, 10:03 AM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default

_________________ _________________
1 Cite as: 555 U. S. ____ (2008)
Per Curiam

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 08A332
JENNIFER BRUNNER, OHIO SECRETARY OF STATE
v.
OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY ET AL.

ON APPLICATION FOR STAY
[October 17, 2008]
PER CURIAM.
On October 9, 2008, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio entered a temporary restraining order (TRO) directing Jennifer Brunner, theOhio Secretary of State, to update Ohio’s Statewide VoterRegistration Database (SWVRD) to comply with Section303 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA), 116 Stat. 1708, 42 U. S. C. §15483(a)(5)(B)(i).* The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied the Secretary’s motion to vacate the TRO. The Secretary has filed an application to stay the TRO with J
USTICE STEVENS as Circuit Justice for the Sixth Circuit, and he has referred the matter to the Court. The Secretary argues both that the District Court had no jurisdiction to enter the TRO and that its ruling on the merits was erroneous. We express no opinion on the question whether HAVA is being properly implemented. Respondents,however, are not sufficiently likely to prevail on the ques
——————
*Title 42 U. S. C. §15483(a)(5)(B)(i) (2000 ed., Supp. V) states, inrelevant part:
"The chief State election official and the official responsible for theState motor vehicle authority of a State shall enter into an agreement to match information in the database of the statewide voter registrationsystem with information in the database of the motor vehicle authorityto the extent required to enable each such official to verify the accuracyof the information provided on applications for voter registration." 2
BRUNNER
v. OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY Per Curiam

tion whether Congress has authorized the District Courtto enforce Section 303 in an action brought by a private litigant to justify the issuance of a TRO. See Gonzaga Univ. v. Doe, 536 U. S. 273, 283 (2002); Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U. S. 275, 286 (2001). We therefore grant the application for a stay and vacate the TRO.
It is so ordered.
__________________________________________________ ___
Here is the Court's full order. As you can see, it does not rule on the merits - it is a technical ruling regarding the likelihood of a private litigant's standing to enforce federal voting law. Doesn't say he can't - only that a TRO (temporary restraining order) is not called for.

Pretty limited ruling, and it looks like a setback, but it's really pretty limited. A lot of litigation ahead on this one.
__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2008, 03:41 PM
Advisor Advisor is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 938
Talking

Florida redux?
__________________
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. -Samuel Johnson
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2008, 05:26 AM
SuperScout's Avatar
SuperScout SuperScout is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Out in the country, near Dripping Springs TX
Posts: 5,734
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default

Worse than Florida, as Da Dims are stealing votes in multiple states.
__________________
One Big Ass Mistake, America

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2008, 06:03 AM
colmurph's Avatar
colmurph colmurph is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,047
Default

While the overall population of Pennsylvania has been in decline, the local papers have come out with some startling statistics. There are 1,200,000 more registered Democrats in Pennsylvania in 2008 than there were in 2004. Where did they come from? Are you trying to tell me that 1,200,000 Reublicans switched parties? Looks to me like the Democrats have stolen the future from America. We're going to have a one party system just like the USSR. This election marks the beginning of the end of the Republic. We're soon going to be the Socialist States of America.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2008, 06:57 AM
reconeil's Avatar
reconeil reconeil is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Avenel, New Jersey
Posts: 5,967
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default Murph,...

"Soon going to be,..."????????????

Hell,...when apparently The Mainstream Press/Media & Democrat Majority Controlled
Legislature/Congress and now even The Judiciary and/or Supreme Court are: "In-the-tank"
or beholding to The Marxist Dems,...seems more so like Communism to me.
Bet that Tass, Pravda & Izvestia & Government of the old Soviet Union were more:
"Fair & Balanced" (more honest also)?

If that phony Barack Hussein Obama II or Jr. buys his way into: "Recapturing The White
House AT ANY COST to America" or Commanding The Executive Branch for The Staunch
Leftist Crowd,...just Watch Out! Excluding gleeful DNC & ISLAM, rest of US (both ways)
will be in deep s--t.

Such an overall full sweep by The Royal Obamas & Her Worship Nancy Pelosi & Rest of
Court Jesters (both in politics & press)...and it's anyones guess how America will turn out?
But then, and since Americans are largely already kept on: "A Need to Know" about Barack,
...maybe we'll truly never get to know anything important about anything?

Besides, understand that MANY Soviet (now Russian) Citizens still much prefer their old
ways and/or where Big Brother just like DNC cares for you: "From The Cradle to The Grave".
For Dems in general, The More Beholders The Better (Citizens or NOT).

Neil
__________________
My Salute & "GarryOwen" to all TRUE Patriots.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-18-2008, 12:46 PM
Seascamp Seascamp is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,754
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default

I have to believe that the US Supreme Court would not enable or condone the ACORN vote fraud going on in Ohio and across the US. If they did so, they would have to know that they disemboweled the concept of a vote and rights to vote. What I see is tantamount to accepting a plea bargain-admission of guilt, with the stipulation that the corrupt Ohio DNC bunch will submit a viable correction plan within a two weeks.
The lower Ohio Federal District Court accepted the evidence and ruled accordingly and this is not trivia to be lightly dismissed, nor does the Supreme Court give ACORN a ticket to ride the vote fraud train and render the legitimate vote a useless gesture of irrelevant whacking-off of mud turtles.

Next up is foot-dragging and buying time to avoid the Supreme Court requirements for a plan or even a plan to have a plan. So we’ll just have to see if Ohio’s ‘Boss Tweed‘ and her corrupt ’Tammany Hall’ vote fraud machine can defy the US Supreme Court. This is an important move to watch, very important.

Scamp
__________________
I'd rather be a hammer than a nail, yes I would, I really would.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-18-2008, 01:28 PM
reconeil's Avatar
reconeil reconeil is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Avenel, New Jersey
Posts: 5,967
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default Scamp,...

I can't understand why both State & Federal Voting Illegalities were accepted hearing
by ANY COURT, anyway? Everything mandated doing seemed spelled-out quite clearly.

Besides, shouldn't both State & Federal Prosecutors be trying such oath-taking defiers of
both State & Federal Statutes,...INSTEAD?

Also, anyone not wanting to do their job as required shouldn't bother The Supreme Court
with such obvious Politics. Just quit and go work for DNC or ACORN, or both simultaneously.

Besides, all obvious Voter Frauds or Riggings for Obama belong at DNC & ACORN, anyway.
Most definitely not in any State Government.

Neil
__________________
My Salute & "GarryOwen" to all TRUE Patriots.

Last edited by reconeil; 10-19-2008 at 06:53 AM. Reason: correction
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-18-2008, 01:46 PM
Seascamp Seascamp is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,754
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default

And Neil,

With regard to Russia, you are partially correct but not entirely so. I have worked there recently and what I see is a culture that doesn’t trust anybody. The radical leftists proofed anybody that had independent thoughts and did so for seven decades. From 1990 till now what is seen is a rebellious culture that wouldn’t piss on the communists if they were on fire, and have similar thoughts about the corrupt politicos pretending not to be punk-ass dictators and murderous bastards. Perhaps same game-different name.

All I know for sure is that the Russians are not mindless at all, and have yet to meet one, even one that are as foul-mouthed and insulting as the dynamic duo politico scripted ones that hang out here.

In critique; out spoken, hell yes, now feeling independent as individuals, hell yes, Olga standing up to Ivan and smacking back for once, oh hell yes n‘ oh yikes. A new generation of Russians happening and where all that goes I have no idea. Kind of like a bunch of Irish, but with more spunk n’ fire, assuming that is possible, not likely, but still possible. A lot of steam venting from decades of being captive human beings and things get more than a bit wild, more than a bit, I‘d say. Moving from shades of inhumane gray corruption to bright neon is a bit much for any culture to adsorb easily. All n’ all, an Ok bunch as far as I could tell, in most instances.

Scamp
__________________
I'd rather be a hammer than a nail, yes I would, I really would.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-18-2008, 02:25 PM
Seascamp Seascamp is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,754
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default

Again Neil, there is a contest happening.
The question to be answered is if or if not vote fraud and vote corruption represents a free will ligament vote. There are no shades of gray to be considered. Ohio plus ACORN have thrown down the gauntlet and not likely things will be the same again. As stupid and disastrous as it might seem, Ohio asserts the right to the fraudulent and corrupt vote. So there it is Neil, new wave; ‘Corrupt Vote Rights‘ .

Regardless of the results of the coming election, Obama has tethered himself or has been tethered to the black dog of corruption. Red sky in the morning, Sailor take warning. We enter the maelstrom of human vote rights contempt now, and it isn’t going to be pretty.


Scamp
__________________
I'd rather be a hammer than a nail, yes I would, I really would.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Voter Fraud and Da Dims SuperScout Political Debate 0 09-22-2008 09:52 AM
Voter fraud 39mto39g General Posts 4 12-14-2006 02:39 AM
Stopping Voter Fraud SuperScout Political Debate 10 09-29-2006 09:03 AM
Voter Fraud Alert SuperScout Political Debate 3 09-30-2004 08:52 AM
Voter Fraud! wrbones General Posts 1 09-30-2004 08:12 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.