|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
It's Bush vs. Kerry
Brandt Ayers: It's Bush vs. Kerry
At the end of his Meet the Press interview, President Bush framed the main campaign issue in terms that make this the most important election since the end of World War II. The foremost issue, he said, is, “Who can properly use American power in a way to make the world a better place, who understands times are changing and how best to have policy reflect those times.” It was a succinct restatement of the theoretical beliefs held by his tight group of advisers, led by Vice President Dick Cheney, that America can shape a disorderly world by force of arms — alone, if others disagree. The consensus Democratic candidate, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, rejects this notion of a frightening new world held in check by American armies and missiles. As a first act of a Kerry presidency, he says would be to signal that the United States is ready to resume its role as leader of an alliance of democracies, one divided by Bush’s hasty, go-it-alone belligerence. By November the country will have to decide whether the nation’s character and personality will change from the traditional friendly, strong, patient leader of nations or become aloof, suspicious, quick to fight. And which sets of knowledge, experience and temperament will the nation decide it wants in the Oval center of world affairs? We know George Bush fairly well. He comes off as a regular fellow, a nice man with a sweet, pretty wife. He’s the kind of person you’d want to have as Neighbor In Chief. But Commander In Chief? After his interview with Tim Russert, I happened on British Prime Minister Tony Blair also fielding questions on live TV about his Iraq War policies from 13 chairmen of Parliamentary committees. The two should never appear together on live TV. Blair was sharp, witty, in command of the facts, demonstrating for instance that he had read the entirety of Chief Arms Inspector David Kay’s report. Tony Blair consistently conveys an understanding of how the world is ordered, the moral and legal foundations underlying its structure, and what stance Britain should take in light of current circumstances. Amiable, inarticulate, often contradictory George Bush is no match for Blair, but in his NBC interview he did succeed in getting across how he would confront a crisis similar to Iraq in the future. As a New York Times editorial put it, “In a dangerous world the critical thing is to act decisively, and worry about connecting the dots later.”In other words, shoot first and ask questions later. The Cheney-Bush White House has thoroughly demonstrated it has an itchy trigger finger, and knows how to pull it. Invading Iraq came up in the very first National Security Council meeting — long before 9/11. George Bush and his team are yet to prove they can heal painful divisions and return an isolated enemy to normal relations with the world. John Kerry did that by resolving the Vietnamese POW issue. By using delicate, patient diplomacy — reaching out to a Republican and fellow Vietnam veteran John McCain — Kerry helped heal the psychic wounds of war, making a place for Vietnam in the family of nations. The candidates are chosen and the issue is joined. Will Cheney and Bush continue to redefine America as a nation so strong, so self-sufficient that it does not need friends, an arrogant Imperial Power whose will must be obeyed — or else? Or will we link arms again with our former friends and comrades in arms, recreating again the concert of democracies that won a Cold War with the power of its ideals, backed by an irresistible military alliance? Patriots of my generation hope the balance of idealism and strength that has led willing democracies so well for 60 years will not be lost. To us, this is the election of a lifetime. http://www.annistonstar.com/opinion/...-4b13q4923.htm -- |
Sponsored Links |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hanoi John F. Kerry beats Bush in Polls - Kerry - the guy who started the "baby killers" lie | Adolph Al Franken - Brown Shirt Left Wing Fascist | General | 2 | 02-10-2004 09:43 AM |
IS KERRY BETTER FOR THE VIETKONG THAN BUSH ? | EL CHINO BOATMEN'S CONSCIENCE | General | 0 | 02-08-2004 06:23 AM |
|