The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Conflict posts > Enduring Freedom

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-25-2010, 09:39 AM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Thumbs up Petraeus to Modify Afghanistan Rules of Engagement, Source Says

A military source close to Gen. David Petraeus says one of the first things the general will do when he takes over in Afghanistan is to modify the controversial rules of engagement to make it easier for U.S. troops to engage in combat with the enemy.

Troops on the ground and some military commanders have said the strict rules -- aimed at preventing civilian casualties -- have effectively forced the troops to fight with one hand tied behind their backs.

At a news conference at the Pentagon Thursday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen said Petraeus will have the flexibility to make tactical changes. But he said that does necessarily mean changes will be made.

President Obama said Wednesday after he accepted Gen. Stanley McChrystal's resignation in the wake of a magazine article in which he and his staff were critical of the administration that the change-up does not represent a shift in war strategy.

The issue is likely to be front and center in Senate confirmation hearings for Petraeus next week.

Fox News' Steve Centanni and Justin Fishel contributed to this report.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...t-source-says/
__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 06-29-2010, 09:01 AM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Thumbs up

Petraeus: I’ll Change Afghanistan’s Rules of War
  • By Spencer Ackerman
  • June 29, 2010 |
  • 10:20 am |
  • Categories: Af/Pak


Who called it? Noah mused last week that Gen. David Petraeus might relax the strict rules on U.S. troops in Afghanistan once he takes over command of the war there. Looks like Petraeus is proving Noah right.

In his opening statement, Petraeus vowed to “look very hard” at the directives Gen. Stanley McChrystal put in place to cut down on civilian casualties. McChrystal was following counterinsurgency principles that Petraeus, in large part, pioneered and championed within the U.S. military, principles that led McChrystal to say that the attitudes of the Afghan people will be “strategically decisive” in the war.

And Petraeus, as you’d expect, publicly supports that mission to the hilt.

“In counterinsurgency operations, the human terrain is the decisive terrain,” he said, using a jargony term to mean the Afghan people. “I will continue the emphasis on reducing the loss of innocent civilian life to an absolute minimum in the course of military operations.” But that doesn’t mean he’ll continue McChrystal’s rules as written.

In Afghanistan, McChrystal went further in restricting troops’ ability to use force than Petraeus did in Iraq. McChrystal cut way back on the use of air cover for U.S. troops in firefights, instructed them to give Afghans the right of way on highways, and urged them to cut off battles when insurgents retreat to populated areas. The biggest overlooked aspect of Michael Hastings’ Rolling Stone piece that ended McChrystal’s career was the frustration troops in Afghanistan felt under the rules of engagement — fairly or unfairly.


So, to send a new signal to those troops, Petraeus called it a “moral imperative” to allow troops “all the support they need when they are in a tough situation.” He said discussed it with the Afghan leadership over the last few days and indicated that he secured their “full agreement” for that principle. While Petraeus didn’t specifically promise a change in the rules or their application, that’s a pretty strong indication that a change is in the works when Petraeus gets to Kabul — something Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the chairman of the committee, indicated he wanted to see the Senate ensure happens before the July 4 holiday.

So while no one should expect Petraeus to abandon population-centric counterinsurgency — “we cannot kill or capture our way out of an industrial-strength insurgency,” he said, so you don’t get it twisted — “we will continue to pursue relentlessly the enemies of the new Afghanistan in the months and years ahead.”

Photo: U.S. Army



Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010...#ixzz0sG54qBTx
__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Petraeus: al-Qaida not operating in Afghanistan David Enduring Freedom 0 05-10-2009 06:19 AM
Petraeus: more than troops needed in Afghanistan DeadlyDaring Enduring Freedom 0 09-14-2008 05:53 PM
RULES of ENGAGEMENT "Not Clear"? reconeil General Posts 3 08-23-2006 04:37 AM
The rules of engagement? Stick Warfare 6 10-26-2005 03:29 AM
Rules of Engagement SuperScout Iraqi Freedom 2 03-01-2005 04:41 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.