|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Well it's about damn time!
Some "senior" republican leaders in the house have finally come on board with the democrats in condemning the latest idiotic & malicious proposal to come from the Bush administration in their "quest" to thoroughly dismantle the Department of Veterans Affairs. I suppose THEY finally got tired of watching their fearless leader break all of those campaign promises like the rest of us have!
################# JIM ABRAMS Associated Press WASHINGTON - Senior Republicans on the House Veterans' Affairs Committee have joined Democrats and veterans groups in a chorus of protest against proposals being considered by the Bush administration to shrink the number of military personnel who qualify for disability benefits. Changes in the definition of service-connected disability "could have far-reaching and unintended consequences for millions of servicemembers and veterans," wrote the committee chairman, Rep. Christopher Smith, R-N.J., and three of the panel's subcommittee chairmen. The Senate's top Democrats, Minority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota and Whip Harry Reid of Nevada, also weighed in on the issue Friday, telling President Bush in a letter that it was "outrageous to pit one group of disabled veterans against another." Daschle said the proposals, if retroactive, could disqualify about 1.5 million veterans, about two-thirds of those now in the VA disability program. The proposals, which have not gone beyond the preliminary discussion stage. They were part of a response to what veterans regard as a century-old injustice without adding another major chunk to a federal deficit, already at record levels because of the war on terror, operations in Iraq and tax cuts every year since Bush took office. Under current law, disabled veterans eligible for military retirement pay have their retirement reduced by the amount they receive in disability payments. Veterans groups argue that civilian federal employees on disability get full retirement benefits, and lawmakers for years have tried to extend that right to veterans. The problem is cost: estimates are that full "concurrent receipt" of both benefits would cost $58 billion over 10 years. This year the Senate, in its version of a $400 billion defense spending bill for next year, included full restitution of benefits. The House bill did not contain the provision, and the issue has become a major sticking point in reaching a compromise on the crucial defense bill. The White House and House GOP leaders have floated less costly compromise proposals that would phase in the increase of benefits over four or five years and narrow the definition of service-connected disabilities. Democrats circulated on Friday a two-page draft, described as a White House document, that define qualified disabilities as those injuries and illnesses "directly resulting from the performance of official military duties." Actions unrelated to official government business, including travel between home and duty station, would not qualify. Smith and the other Veterans' Committee Republicans cited estimates that 50 percent to 90 percent would not qualify if the standards were applied to current disability claims. They added that future payments to widows could also be jeopardized. House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Rep. Lane Evans of Illinois, top Democrat on Smith's committee, said they would oppose any attempt to restrict disability criteria to pay for repealing what they called the disabled veterans' tax. Currently, service-connected disability payments are made to about 2.4 million veterans, at an annual cost of about $17.6 billion. Payments also are made to some 315,000 surviving spouses and children of disability-qualified veterans. Veterans groups are adamantly opposed to the changes. The American Legion promised in a statement to "stop dead in their tracks any fiscal compromises that would make it harder for veterans to receive just compensation." "If this is the only compromise that is thrown out there, then I think it will kill the issue," Legion Commander John A. Brieden said in an interview. Five other service organizations, including Disabled American Veterans and Paralyzed Veterans of America, put out a statement saying that the "House majority leadership has shown callous contempt for the sacrifices of America's defenders by attempting to impose overly restrictive conditions that would limit benefits for disabilities." Republican aides stressed that no final decision has been reached on benefits, and the drive to link benefits and a smaller eligibility pool may be abandoned. Among ideas being discussed, they said, were extending both retirement and disability pay to a smaller group of more seriously disabled veterans. ######################## How in the name of hell can all the "conservatives" (compassionate or otherwise) around here continue to condone or ignore this bullshit by GEE-W's gang of thugs without at least a dogone "whimper" of disgust and outrage! :cd: :cd: :cd:
__________________
Gimpy "MUD GRUNT/RIVERINE" "I ain't no fortunate son"--CCR "We have shared the incommunicable experience of war..........We have felt - we still feel - the passion of life to its top.........In our youth our hearts were touched with fire" Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. |
Sponsored Links |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Damn Swabbos! | revwardoc | Airforce | 4 | 10-24-2005 05:23 PM |
Damn Marines | thedrifter | Marines | 2 | 05-29-2004 04:57 AM |
Its about damn time | reeb | General Posts | 0 | 04-28-2004 03:32 AM |
Damn toys | Stick | General Posts | 3 | 10-22-2003 06:28 PM |
damn it damn it damn it cubs lose :-(( | MORTARDUDE | Vietnam | 8 | 10-17-2003 09:40 PM |
|