The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General > Military Weapons

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2004, 05:37 AM
BLUEHAWK's Avatar
BLUEHAWK BLUEHAWK is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 4,638
Send a message via Yahoo to BLUEHAWK
Distinctions
Contributor 
Question 175mm cannon

Any among us here ever been close by or actually pulled the string or crewed on firing a 175mm cannon?

Lordy, that's a large weapon...

How long and big around (in layman's terms, say, relative to a basketball) is the "bullet" ?

What is its size and effectiveness/explosive-destructive power compared with the Naval sixteen inchers?

How far will it travel (maximum)?

What purpose does it serve in an arsenal? i.e. what would be its most ideal function and how many of them would a battery need?

How it the world do ya haul it around, up mountainsides and sandbox dunes or whatnot?
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 03-01-2010, 06:15 AM
colmurph's Avatar
colmurph colmurph is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,047
Default

The 175mm was designated as a Howitzer because it was not a "Direct Fire" weapon. It was "Separate Loading" which means that the shell was rammed into the forcing cone and then powder bags were put into the breech behind the shell. The charge was "Cut" in that the powder was adjusted to the correct range just like in a 105m or 155mm howitzer. After the breech was closed (interrupted step screw just like the 155mm) a separate primer was attached to the back of the breech and it was fired by pulling a lanyard that tripped a small hammer onto the primer which fired through a touch hole that went through the center of the breech. The "Base Charge" which was the powder bag closest to the breech, had a thin bag of black powder sewn to the bottom of the bag which was ignited by the primer and in turn set off the cordite which was in the main charge. The 175mm had a very short "Tube Life" of about 150 rounds at charge 7 equivalent. This means that if charge 5 were fired a lot, you could get possibly 250 rounds through the tube before erosion wiped out the rifling in front of the forcing ring and ruined the accuracy. We had them on one of our fire bases in Vietnam and as I recall, they didn't sound a whole lot louder than a 155. I used to see Chinooks carrying old shot out tubes out over the Soouth China Sea to drop into the water. Big waste of money as they could have been sent back to Watervliet Arsenal to be re-lined. But then we're talking about a military mindset that used slightly damaged main rotors from Chinooks as sidewalks. Those worked out to about $3 million for about 100 feet of sidewalk.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cannon Air Force Base melody1181 General Posts 4 06-22-2006 07:46 AM
Sid's building a cannon... goodnessgracie Vietnam 78 09-10-2005 06:31 PM
Bush Cabal Gives Cannon Fodder/Military the Finger by ARMY TIMES MORTARDUDE General Posts 11 08-16-2003 07:22 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.