The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General > Political Debate

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2004, 11:33 AM
SuperScout's Avatar
SuperScout SuperScout is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Out in the country, near Dripping Springs TX
Posts: 5,734
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default Speech given at West Point

EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the text of William F. Buckley Jr.'s June 8, 1971, commencement address to the United States Military Academy at West Point. The speech appears here as it is in "Let Us Talk of Many Things: The Collected Speeches."

The morale in the armed services was low, reflecting the impasse and progressive demoralization in Vietnam, and especially the trial of Lieutenant William Calley for the massacre at My Lai. A drastic charge, flamboyantly made by decorated veteran John Kerry (now a United States senator from Massachusetts), had been rapturously received. Kerry ascribed to our soldiers in Vietnam uncivilized, barbarous practices. I devoted my talk to asking about Mr. Kerry's charges and reflecting on their implications.

A great deal has been written lately on the spirit of progressivism at West Point. I note that a generation ago, cadets were not permitted to read a newspaper, whereas today, each cadet room receives a daily copy of the New York Times. I know now what it means to be nostalgic for the good old days. I read ten days ago the full text of the quite remarkable address delivered by John Kerry before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. It was an address, I am told, that paralyzed the committee by its eloquence and made Mr. Kerry - a veteran of the war in Vietnam, a pedigreed Bostonian, a graduate of Yale University - an instant hero.

After reading it I put it aside, deeply troubled as I was by the haunting resonance of its peroration, which so moved the audience. The words he spoke were these: "[We are determined] to undertake one last mission, to search out and destroy the last vestige of this barbaric war, to pacify our hearts, to conquer the hate and fear that have driven this country these last ten years and more, so that when, thirty years from now, our brothers go down the street without a leg, without an arm, or a face, and small boys ask why, we will be able to say 'Vietnam!' and not mean a desert, not a filthy obscene memory, but the place where America finally turned and where soldiers like us helped it in the turning."

"Where America finally turned."? We need to wonder: where America finally turned from what? Mr. Kerry, in introducing himself to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, made it plain that he was there to speak not only for himself, but for what he called "a very much larger group of veterans in this country." He then proceeded to describe the America he knows, the America from which he enjoined us all to turn.

In Southeast Asia, he said, he saw "not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command." A grave charge, but the sensitive listener will instantly assume that Mr. Kerry is using the word "crime" loosely, as in, "He was criminally thoughtless in not writing home more often to his mother." But Mr. Kerry quickly interdicted that line of retreat. He went on to enumerate precisely such crimes as are being committed "on a day-to-day basis, with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command." He gave tales of torture, of rape, of Americans who randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravages of war."

Mr. Kerry informed Congress that what threatens the United States is "not Reds, and not redcoats," but "the crimes" we are committing. He tells us that we have "created a monster, a monster in the form of millions of men who have been taught to deal and to trade in violence, and who have returned with a sense of anger." Most specifically he singled out for criticism a sentence uttered by Mr. Agnew here at West Point a year ago: "Some glamorize the criminal misfits of society while our best men die in Asian rice paddies
to preserve the freedom which most of those misfits abuse." Mr. Kerry insists that the so-called misfits are the true heroes, inasmuch as it was they who "were standing up for us in a way that nobody else in this country dared to." As for the men in Vietnam, he added, "we cannot consider ourselves America's 'best men' when we are ashamed of and hated for what we were called on to do in Southeast Asia."

And indeed, if American soldiers have been called upon to rape and to torture and to exterminate non-combatants, it is obvious that they should be ashamed, less obvious why they have not expressed that shame more widely on returning to the United States, particularly inasmuch as we have been assured by Mr. Kerry that they have been taught to deal and to trade in violence. Are there extenuating circumstances? Is there a reason for our being in Vietnam? "To attempt to justify the loss of one American life in Vietnam, Cambodia, or Laos by linking such loss to the preservation of freedom . . . is . . . the height of criminal hypocrisy, and it is that kind of hypocrisy which we feel has torn this country apart." It is then, we reason retrospectively, not alone an act of hypocrisy that caused the joint chiefs of staff and the heads of the civilian departments engaged in strategic calculations to make the recommendations they made over the past ten years, to three Presidents of the United States: it was not merely hypocrisy, but criminal hypocrisy. The nature of that hypocrisy? "All," Mr. Kerry sums up, "that we were told about the mystical war against Communism."

The indictment is complete. It is the indictment of an ignorant young man who is willing to condemn in words that would have been appropriately used in Nuremberg the governing class of America: the legislators, the generals, the statesmen. And, reaching beyond them, the people, who named the governors to their positions of responsibility and ratified their decisions in several elections. The point I want to raise is this: If America is everything that John Kerry says it is, what is it appropriate for us to do? The wells of regeneration are infinitely deep, but the stain described by John Kerry goes too deep to be bleached out by
conventional remorse or resolution: better the destruction of America, if, to see ourselves truly, we need to look into the mirror John Kerry holds up for us. If we are a nation of sadists, of kid-killers and torturers, of hypocrites and criminals, let us be done with it, and pray that a great flood or fire will destroy us, leaving John Kerry and maybe Mrs. Benjamin Spock to take the place of Lot, in reseeding a new order.

Gentleman, how many times, in the days ahead, you w ill need to ask yourselves the most searching question of all, the counterpart of the priest's most agonizing doubt: Is there a God? Yours will be: Is America worth it? John Kerry's assault on this country did not rise full-blown in his mind, like Venus from the Cypriot Sea. It is the crystallization of an assault upon America which has been fostered over the years by an intellectual class given over to self-doubt and self-hatred, driven by a cultural disgust with the uses to which so many people put their freedom. The assault on the military, the many and subtle vibrations of which you feel as keenly as James Baldwin knows the inflections of racism, is an assault on the proposition that what we have, in America, is truly worth defending. The military is to be loved or despised according as it defends that which is beloved or perpetuates that which is despised. The root question has not risen to such a level of respectability as to work itself into the platform of a national political party, but it lurks in the rhetoric of the John Kerry?s, such that a blind man, running his fingers over the features of the public rhetoric, can discern the meaning of it: Is America worth it?

That is what they are saying to you. And that is what so many Americans reacted to in the case of Lieutenant Calley. Mistakenly, they interpreted the conviction of Calley as yet another effort to discredit the military. And though they will not say it in as many words, they know that if there is no military, it will quickly follow that there will be no America, of the kind that they know, that we know. The America that listens so patiently to its John Kerry?s, the America that shouldered the great burden of preserving oases of freedom after the great curtain came down with that Bolshevik subtlety that finally expressed itself in a Wall, to block citizens of the socialist utopia from leaving, enroute even to John Kerry's America; the America that all but sank under the general obloquy, in order to stand by, in Southeast Asia, a commitment it had soberly made, to the cause of Containment - I shall listen patiently, decades hence, to those who argue that our commitment in Vietnam and our attempt to redeem it were tragically misconceived. I shall not listen to those who say that it was less than the highest tribute to national motivation, to collective idealism, and to international rectitude. I say this with confidence because I have never met an American who takes pleasure from the Vietnam War or who desires to exploit the Vietnamese. So during those moments when doubt will assail you, moments that will come as surely as the temptations of the flesh, I hope you will pause. I know, I know, at the most hectic moments of one's life it isn't easy - indeed, the argument can be made that neither is it seemly - to withdraw from the front line in order to consider the general situation philosophically. But what I hope you will consider, during these moments of doubt, is the essential professional point: Without organized force, and the threat of the use of it under certain circumstances, there is no freedom, anywhere. Without freedom, there is no true humanity. If America is the monster of John Kerry, burn your commissions tomorrow morning and take others, which will not bind you in the depraved conspiracy you have heard described. If it is otherwise, remember: the freedom John Kerry enjoys, and the freedom I enjoy, are, quite simply, the result of your dedication. Do you wonder that I accepted the opportunity to salute you?
__________________
One Big Ass Mistake, America

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 04-26-2004, 12:18 PM
colmurph's Avatar
colmurph colmurph is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,047
Default

Don't hold your breath for comments on this SS. The quibblers will just dismiss this as some more "Republican Garbage" generated to oppose Kerry in November. See my post about Kerrys interview this morning with ABC's Charlie Gibson. I'ts all a "Republican Plot" to the Master Quibbler and also to one of his Minor Prophets.....Gimpy. I'm really surprised as Charlie Gibson has always been a staunch Democrat and ABC has always taken the side of the Democrats in any political controversy. Have the GOP bought ABC lock, stock and barrel?

Charlie Gibson was there and SAW Kerry throw medals over the fence but Kerry says "No, you didn't see me throw them Charlie, Charlie you are wrong. That's not what happened. I threw my ribbons across." Now is that a classic quibble or not?

According to Gimpy, I am a Liar and Quibbler and have no honor because I am debating with him. I think that Gimpy is a couple of cans short of a Six-Pack.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2004, 02:51 PM
Seascamp Seascamp is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,754
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default Cols......

I?d say that Kerry strapped on the wrong JATO bottle rocket long ago and most likely wouldn?t get into a misadventure like that again. At the time I suppose he was getting face time in a pop cause and never in his wildest imagination did he foresee what a long-term quagmire all that Red stuff was. The Guy is pealing carpet to distance himself from Fonda and her ilk and his entire episode/adventure with the Reds. I don?t fault him for trying to get clear of that ball of venomous snakes, but do find Kerry having way too much ambition and way too little savvy at the time and that combination is always good for some skid marks on the highway, a hole in the fence and a trip out into the boon dock pasture of life.

The odds-on bet at the time was that the Communists/Soviet Union were the cause de jour and I don?t doubt for a moment that the opportunistic Kerry saw that as an opportunity for face time/recognition by being with the mob that was going to belly rub, pinch and tickle, tap dance and otherwise make amends and body fluids with the Reds. He was almost right for a few years when every tin pot nincompoop Dictator in the world had a high vacuum lip lock on the Red butt and was kicking sand in the US face via the UN shenanigans. But then the Afghanistan war came along, then the Gipper and then all of a sudden, oops, Ivan crapped his pants and the once plausible scenario of hugging your local, friendly, neighborhood Communist revolutionary went by the boards, then the Bear went bust, etc., etc.

In terms of being a helpful idiot for the Reds, I?d say Kerry did OK, but not world class like a Fonda or the rest of the idiotic?shits did. Anyway, if he appears to equivocate and blather a bit I?m sure it?s simply because he knows he got had, big time, and would just as soon we all pass on those issues. I?ll be happy if he simply republishes his currently suppressed book as there isn?t any arguing about all that, but I want to read and study/research that publication for myself/ see what I see. My guess is that he got a lot of ?help? with that book and that help can?t stand a lot of daylight and scrutiny.

Scamp
__________________
I'd rather be a hammer than a nail, yes I would, I really would.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2004, 04:51 PM
SuperScout's Avatar
SuperScout SuperScout is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Out in the country, near Dripping Springs TX
Posts: 5,734
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default

As a proud charter member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, I don't anticipate laudatory messages from Quibbling Apologists Section, but thought it an extraordinarily timely piece about the Prince of Ketchup and Waffles. If he was so naive then about the communists as he proclaimed, one must seriously wonder if he's any more enlightened now about the evils of AlQaeda, bin Laden, and any other avowed foe of the Free World. To have voted for the Patriot Act, only to speak out against it, to have voted for military action in Iraq, only to vote against funding our warriors efforts raises serious questions about the depth of his convictions.

Right now, I'm as confused as an illegitimate child at a family reunion, trying to figure out if, when, why, where, why not, whose, medals/ribbons make-believe confetti Kerry did or did not fling over said and yon fence. Sacrificing something one doesn't own is a callous and shallow demonstration, requiring no commitment and no conviction. At least with Howard Dean, his scream was real!
__________________
One Big Ass Mistake, America

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2004, 09:15 AM
sfc_darrel sfc_darrel is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Indian Springs, Nevada
Posts: 1,521
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default

Has anyone considered how easy it is to get replacement ribbons and medals?

I can buy most of mine on base, still. I can get them at businesses located near bases. I can probably buy them all on ebay.

Pete & Joy talk about making a shadow box for mine but they are long gone. They found replacements for all at aafes.com except
1) the Vietnam patch which Joy bought at a store outside a base in Illinois and
2) a medal for a 100 mile volksmarch which I might be able to get from the organizers (yes, it is still going on every year) in Germany.
3) guns hanging below the shooting ribbon but I'm sure Joy could find they if she tried :re: (Maybe she already has. She loves surprises)

Who ever said that they were the medals and ribbons originally awarded to him?
_________
Superscout,
Thanks for the post. Joy sent it out into the net like she does with all the ones that touch her.

We're trying to stay out of the political fights here but sometimes we have to insert something that's just not being said.

Darrel
__________________
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2004, 04:18 PM
SuperScout's Avatar
SuperScout SuperScout is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Out in the country, near Dripping Springs TX
Posts: 5,734
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default Darrel

Several points:

1. Somehow, the apparent and obvious went smooth over my head: of course one can always replace medals and ribbons, usually with a quick trip to the PX/BX/NX. Failing this, usually any pawn shop within 500' of a military base will have ample supplies of pracatically any medal awarded since the fall of the Alamo. And as I said, throwing someone else's medals is about as commendable as writing odes to used toilet paper.

2. Thanks for the kind words.

3. And thank your lucky stars for Joy! (which I'm sure you've already done!)
__________________
One Big Ass Mistake, America

"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
?Defamation? of West Point Motto Creates Furor darrels joy General Posts 3 08-21-2006 04:31 PM
West Point?s first female general commands COSCOM darrels joy Women Patriots 0 09-11-2004 04:45 PM
Six Dead at West Point Panty Raid thedrifter Marines 0 02-13-2004 07:08 AM
FDC Keeps C 1/11 on Point thedrifter Marines 0 01-03-2004 06:51 AM
West Nile - West Coast HARDCORE General Posts 0 09-13-2002 10:41 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.