The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Military News > Iraq

Post New Thread  Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2021, 03:14 PM
Boats's Avatar
Boats Boats is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 20,666
Arrow Airstrikes Against U.S. Troops in Iraq Highlight Dangers of Our Presence in the Middl

Airstrikes Against U.S. Troops in Iraq Highlight Dangers of Our Presence in the Middle East
By: Fiona Harrigan - Reason Foreign Policy News - 07-06-21

Keeping American boots on the ground means keeping them in harm's way.

Photo link:

On Monday, rockets struck Ayn al-Asad air base, a military facility in Iraq that hosts American troops. U.S. Army Colonel Wayne Marotto, a spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq, tweeted that the attack did not result in casualties. No group immediately claimed responsibility for the action.

Even without human loss, Monday's hostilities highlight the risks associated with a continued U.S. troop presence and ongoing military engagement in the Middle East. The attack came just one week after President Joe Biden's June 27 airstrikes on facilities used by Iran-backed militias in Iraq and Syria, which prompted rocket attacks against U.S. troops in Syria the very next day. There have been many tit-for-tat exchanges between the U.S. and Iran-linked parties since former President Donald Trump ordered the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in January 2020. Though it's unclear who ordered the Monday attack, it is clear that U.S. strikes and troops have failed to deter further antagonism from hostile parties in the region.

While Biden has made the Afghanistan troop withdrawal a centerpiece of his presidential agenda, his plans for the U.S. presence in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East are far vaguer. Following the Soleimani assassination on Iraqi soil, the Iraqi Parliament passed a resolution to expel U.S. troops from the country. No timetable for that withdrawal has emerged during bilateral negotiations, however, leaving the fate of the roughly 3,500 remaining U.S. troops in Iraq unsettled. Roughly 900 are still in Syria and their future is similarly murky.

That leaves ample targets for hostile parties throughout the Middle East, even though the reasons behind a continued troop presence in the two countries are questionable. The main goals for recent U.S. activities in Iraq and Syria—to defeat ISIS and help those nations reclaim seized territory—have largely been accomplished. Given current tensions in the Middle East, keeping American boots on the ground means keeping them in harm's way in order to achieve ill-defined ends.

While justifying the February strike in Syria, Biden claimed the action was "pursuant to the United States' inherent right of self-defense." Democrats in Congress questioned that line of reasoning and pointed out the lack of a congressional authorization for the use of military force in Syria (though previous resolutions authorize such presidential actions in Iraq and Afghanistan). Sen. Tim Kaine (D–Va.) called the attack "not constitutional" given Biden's lack of communication with Congress. Rep. Ro Khanna (D–Calif.) agreed and criticized Biden for carrying out a strike that was "not in self-defense against an imminent threat."

Biden's June strikes received similar scrutiny. They reignited debate over presidential war powers, spurring the House to vote to repeal several military force authorizations. That resistance is making it increasingly difficult for the president to justify the dubious constitutionality of strikes, unnecessary escalation of tensions, and endangering the lives of Americans stationed in the Middle East.

As he announced the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, Biden questioned the sensibility of delaying the troop departure further at the expense of even more lives lost. He invoked "the living cost of war" shown in American deaths, saying, "Every one of those dead are sacred human beings who left behind entire families. An exact accounting of every single solitary one needs to be had."

They are indeed sacred, and Biden is right to ask why he should pass the responsibility of the war in Afghanistan to yet another presidential administration. He should take that logic a step further and realize that his concern about the safety of American troops is contradicted by the U.S. presence and actions elsewhere in the Middle East. Though the Monday strike did not result in American deaths or injuries, U.S. forces may not prove so lucky next time.

Personal note: How did we ever become the "Big Brother" to the Middle East? Was it the oil or the persecutions of its people? The ongoing struggle of the Middle East was to find compromise without persecution - which seems endless. Religious zealous teachings and the demographics seem to indicate an impossible task still remains.
Were we making some headway? Some - but not enough to turnover the ideology of the religious elders. I do believe in part - we went save the locals from slaughter - but to no avail - has it stopped. The zealous nature of these lands leaves little compromise to change these fundamental movements. The US is not a devil - but it believes - that All People Everywhere - need not be tormented and/or abused for religious beliefs. Some of the Middle East countries have turned the corner and are improving their relations with the people.
Yet today ciaos and murder's still run ramped amongst the peoples in many Middle East Countries. Then again would they rather be ruled by Russia - China or North Korea?
The US doesn't want their lands nor are we trying rule their people. Rather we are there to stop the brutality and slaughter of those unrepresented peoples.
They are not your slaves they are your country men and women - but to kill them like you do - is not justified.
Therefore you're countries favor brutality - which is not humane - therefore you've become a race of thugs with evil intentions - serving out cruelty as though it was your leaders will!
Think about your final days - and they will surely come - and will your Ala welcome you with open arms - or - will the gates of hell open for your justice to be served for your cruelty to your fellow man & woman?
I leave this message for you. We are removing your last hopes of turning corner to improve your countries disputes - but your reasoning goes without proper justice and therefore - its a crime against humanity. We did our best to help you all - our men died for your freedom - so that your lives could mean something.
You lost your opportunity - now you have live without any hope - without any future - and soon you will become the dust of mankind -and reap your rewards when you meet your maker! The gates of Hell will open and you will know doubt be kept there for a millennia.

O Almighty Lord God, who neither slumberest nor sleepest; Protect and assist, we beseech thee, all those who at home or abroad, by land, by sea, or in the air, are serving this country, that they, being armed with thy defence, may be preserved evermore in all perils; and being filled with wisdom and girded with strength, may do their duty to thy honour and glory; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.