The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General > Political Debate

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2008, 08:41 PM
Keith_Hixson's Avatar
Keith_Hixson Keith_Hixson is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington, the state
Posts: 5,022
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default Minister Challenge IRS regulations:

Politics From Pulpit Will Deliver Challenge to IRS

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. -- About 30 ministers across the U.S. plan to protest federal tax laws Sunday by endorsing a presidential candidate from their pulpits, the Wall Street Journal reported, in a move orchestrated by a conservative legal-advocacy group.

A group of ministers in Ohio has also filed a complaint with the IRS to stop the conservative group from encouraging pastors to take political sides, the Associated Press reported. The group of 55 religious leaders from Ohio, Indiana, Iowa and other states said Monday the actions by the Alliance Defense Fund jeopardize the separation of church and state.

The Alliance Defense Fund hopes that at least one sermon will prod the IRS to take action, sparking a court fight over a law that bars nonprofits from partisan political activity, the AP reported. Alliance and several ministers taking part in the protest insist that the law is unconstitutional and believe they would prevail in a court battle.

Some experts say the churches are misguided, and their nonprofit status can be lawfully regulated, the Journal said. "Congress has created a provision" to exempt churches from taxes, "and that provision has restrictions," says Donald Tobin, associate law-school dean at Ohio State University and a former Justice Department attorney. Churches "are obligated to follow them if they want the benefit."

The Alliance Defense Fund says ministers should have the right to speak spiritual truths about societal issues without fear of losing their tax exempt status, the AP said. The ministers opposing the initiative say it's inappropriate for lawyers to be encouraging ministers to break the law.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 09-29-2008, 07:02 AM
Advisor Advisor is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 938
Default

How 'bout this. Give up the nonprofit benefit from the government...no problem. When will people learn that when you get a bennie from Unka Sammy there is always a downside. Kinda like taking the king's shilling.
Don't be beholden to Sam & you can say whatever you want politically.
Frankly I don't agree with churches endorsing candidates..criticizing policy is different.
__________________
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. -Samuel Johnson
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2008, 07:23 AM
Keith_Hixson's Avatar
Keith_Hixson Keith_Hixson is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington, the state
Posts: 5,022
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default The Way The Regulations Stand.

This is an IRS determination and not a law per se. Ministers and Churches cannot officially endorse a particular candidate or engage in political agendas as an official policy. Both liberal and conservative churches often endorse political issues and as some church leaders say, it is hard to tell the difference between a political issue and morality. For instance, abortion, gay marriage, etc. Various denomination are on either side of the issue and promote their views which is "against the law." But both the liberal and conservatives denominations violate the law somewhat.
What these minister are saying is: we feel we have the right to endorse a candidate base on his/her stand on the moral issues. And in their sermons they tried to explain just why they wanted the people to vote a certain way based upon their moral beliefs about that individual. They believe its a freedom of speech issue. I personally don't preach politics from the pulpit. But, I agree with you to a certain extent that tax exempt means limited political involvement or is that taking away a right, freedom of speech. Both sides have some valid points. However, there are some very tax exempt non profit organization that are very public with their speech, ie. The Democrat Party and The Republican Party, are they going to take away their tax exemptions, think about it. Let's tax all the money that flows through those parties. If they are tax exempt and political why can't churches be the same? Most ministers, both liberal and conservative, believe there is a double standard there, and I believe that's what will catch the IRS regulation as being unconstitutional and unfair, you must apply the same standard to churches that you do other tax exempt organizations.

Keith
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2008, 08:27 AM
Advisor Advisor is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 938
Default

I do agree about the double standard. However, the Church does have a higher standard (or at least it should). My own, very personal opinion, is that churches should be taxed on their properties and facilities. Perhaps this would slow the frenzy of building and empire building so the Church can get back to what it is supposed to do..preach the Gospel.
__________________
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. -Samuel Johnson
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2008, 08:54 AM
Keith_Hixson's Avatar
Keith_Hixson Keith_Hixson is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington, the state
Posts: 5,022
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default In the State of Washington

In the State of Washington church property exceeding 5 acres is taxed. Of course there are exceptions, camp grounds and recreational facilities are given some exemptions. So, many churches do pay some tax. We aren't given tax exemptions on sales tax and we ministers pay every tax that everyone else does. Of course a minister can file as self-employed with IRS which allows us to have a few more exemptions than the average person, but not anymore than any other self-employed individual. Churches and ministers do pay taxes, no one is totally tax exempt.

Keith
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2008, 09:05 AM
Seascamp Seascamp is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,754
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Default

My rule; when a religious organization uses the pulpit for political purposes, I vanish, as in poof. I’ll have none of it. Same with charities or supposedly non-partisan orgs like La Raza that say one thing but do quite the opposite. In the last months I have gotten scolded by a number of orgs that I have ceased to provide any funding. Oh boy, they can really turn on the guilt trips, but water off a duck's back, man.
Last church service I went to had the place working alive with hespainc gang punks; presumably seeking absolution in advance. I spotted six and left before the first word was spoken, no more of that for me and no more funding from me either, fini.

Scamp
__________________
I'd rather be a hammer than a nail, yes I would, I really would.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sign Regulations 39mto39g General Posts 12 03-14-2007 01:42 AM
Regulations - My Last Piece As Moderator HARDCORE General Posts 7 02-10-2004 10:03 AM
New regulations for VA health care Gimpy Veterans Benefits 0 01-08-2004 04:42 PM
Federal Regulations Significant to Veterans Otis Willie General 0 11-09-2003 08:02 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.