The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General > Political Debate

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2008, 02:40 PM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default Not no, HELL NO!

Bailout Bill Text - First (not final) version received by Porkbusters from a reliable Hill source Sunday afternoon
Pages 21 & 22

1 ø(A) 65 percent shall be deposited into the
2 Housing Trust Fund established under section
3 1338 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Regu4
latory Reform Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4568);
5 and¿
6 ø(B) 35 percent shall be deposited into the
7 Capital Magnet Fund established under section
8 1339 of that Act (12 U.S.C. 4569).¿
9 ø(3) TRANSFER TO TREASURY.—Revenues of,
10 and proceeds from the sale of troubled assets pur11
chased under this Act, øor from¿ the sale, exercise,
12 or surrender of warrants or senior debt acquired
13 under section ø113¿ shall be paid into the general
14 fund of the Treasury for reduction of the public
15 debt.

http://porkbusters.org/index.php/bailout-bill
__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 09-28-2008, 08:15 PM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default Taken out - for now

Here is the latest bailout draft bill if you can’t access the House website

By Michelle Malkin • September 28, 2008 06:14 PM

Ten Reasons to Oppose the Wall Street Bailout

1. NO REFORM: The plan attempts to mask, rather than reform, imbalances in credit markets and in U.S. economic public policy. The plan props up reckless and failed banks by buying “troubled assets” instead of focusing on real reforms that go after government sponsored culprits Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and sustainable policies that will increase the availability of private capital and expanded economic growth.

2. TREASURY POWER GRAB: The plan raises Constitutional concerns by dramatically expanding the power of the current and future Treasury Secretaries, giving the government agency power to directly purchase assets from for-profit financial and non-financial firms.

3. STUNNING PRICE TAG: The $700 billion bailout figure is as much money as the combined annual budgets of the Departments of Defense, Education and Health and Human Services. It amounts to $2,300 for every man, woman, and child in America.

4. INCREASES NATIONAL DEBT: Instead of cutting spending elsewhere, Congress will borrow all $700 billion on global capital markets, and the bill raises the national debt ceiling to a staggering $11.3 trillion.

5. GLOBAL BAILOUT: The plan includes taxpayer purchases of distressed assets from foreign banks.

6. HURTS RESPONSIBLE AMERICAN BANKS: The plan punishes responsible U.S. banks by keeping reckless, insolvent investment banks in business. As BB&T CEO John Allison wrote in a letter to Congress on Sept. 23rd, “….this is primarily a bailout of poorly run financial institutions…. Corrections are not all bad. The market correction process eliminates irrational competitors.”

7. FLAWED PROCESS: Members of Congress and the public will have less than 24 hours and no hearings to discuss and understand the impact of this sweeping plan. This rush to pass a wildly unpopular plan without benefit of significant public debate and input will also undermine its legitimacy and effectiveness.

8. BY WALL STREET, FOR WALL STREET: Treasury Secretary Paulson, the architect of the plan, was formerly the head of Goldman Sachs, one of the firms responsible for the mess and a direct beneficiary of the bailout. Further, the advisers managing the bailout auctions and assets will be Wall Street firms and will likely receive billions of tax dollars in fees.

9. OTHER OPTIONS NOT EXHAUSTED: The idea that taxpayers will make money on the bailout is not credible. There are ready buyers for these “troubled assets” — Merrill Lynch sold its entire portfolio of mortgage backed securities in July– provided the price is low enough. If a profit was possible, private speculators would readily buy these troubled assets.

10. MORALLY OFFENSIVE: The plan violates basic principles of American capitalism and honest governance by creating a system of “private profits, socialized losses” that transfers money from taxpayers directly to Wall Street investment banks. Free market capitalism only functions if individuals and firms are held accountable and are allowed to both succeed and profit, and also to sustain losses and even fail.

By Michelle Malkin • September 28, 2008 10:36 PM
Attached Files
File Type: pdf ayo08c04_xml[1].pdf (158.0 KB, 1 views)
__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-28-2008, 08:46 PM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no

Sneaking in the same money transfer to ACORN, etc. Hope for homeowners act, homeowners assistance agencies.

Quote:

1
SEC. 109. FORECLOSURE MITIGATION EFFORTS.
2


(a) RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOAN SERVICING
3


STANDARDS.—To the extent that the Secretary acquires
4


mortgages, mortgage backed securities, and other assets
5


secured by residential real estate, including multifamily
6


housing, the Secretary shall implement a plan that seeks
7


to maximize assistance for homeowners and use the au8
thority of the Secretary to encourage the servicers of the
9


underlying mortgages, considering net present value to the
10


taxpayer, to take advantage of the HOPE for Home11
owners Program under section 257 of the National Hous


12
ing Act or other available programs to minimize fore


13
closures. In addition, the Secretary may use loan guaran


14
tees and credit enhancements to facilitate loan modifica


15
tions to prevent avoidable foreclosures.
16


(b) COORDINATION.—The Secretary shall coordinate
17


with the Corporation, the Board (with respect to any
18


mortgage or mortgage-backed securities or pool of securi19
ties held, owned, or controlled by or on behalf of a Federal
20


reserve bank, as provided in section 110(a)(1)(C)), the
21


Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Secretary of Hous22
ing and Urban Development, and other Federal Govern


23
ment entities that hold troubled assets to attempt to iden


24
tify opportunities for the acquisition of classes of troubled
25


assets that will improve the ability of the Secretary to im26
prove the loan modification and restructuring process and,
26
O:


\AYO\AYO08C04.xml
1


where permissible, to permit bona fide tenants who are
2


current on their rent to remain in their homes under the
3


terms of the lease. In the case of a mortgage on a residen4
tial rental property, the plan required under this section
5


shall include protecting Federal, State, and local rental
6


subsidies and protections, and ensuring any modification
7


takes into account the need for operating funds to main8
tain decent and safe conditions at the property.
9


(c) CONSENT TO REASONABLE LOAN MODIFICATION
10


REQUESTS.—Upon any request arising under existing in11
vestment contracts, the Secretary shall consent, where ap


12
propriate, and considering net present value to the tax


13
payer, to reasonable requests for loss mitigation measures,
14


including term extensions, rate reductions, principal write
15


downs, increases in the proportion of loans within a trust
16


or other structure allowed to be modified, or removal of
17


other limitation on modifications.
18


SEC. 110. ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS.
19


(a) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section—
20


(1) the term ‘‘Federal property manager’’
21


means—
22


(A) the Federal Housing Finance Agency,
23


in its capacity as conservator of the Federal
24


National Mortgage Association and the Federal
25


Home Loan Mortgage Corporation;
27
O:


\AYO\AYO08C04.xml
1


(B) the Corporation, with respect to resi2
dential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed se


3
curities held by any bridge depository institu


4
tion pursuant to section 11(n) of the Federal
5


Deposit Insurance Act; and
6


(C) the Board, with respect to any mort7
gage or mortgage-backed securities or pool of
8


securities held, owned, or controlled by or on
9


behalf of a Federal reserve bank, other than
10


mortgages or securities held, owned, or con11
trolled in connection with open market oper


12
ations under section 14 of the Federal Reserve
13


Act (12 U.S.C. 353), or as collateral for an ad14
vance or discount that is not in default;
15


(2) the term ‘‘consumer’’ has the same meaning
16


as in section 103 of the Truth in Lending Act (15
17


U.S.C. 1602);
18


(3) the term ‘‘insured depository institution’’
19


has the same meaning as in section 3 of the Federal
20


Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813); and
21


(4) the term ‘‘servicer’’ has the same meaning
22


as in section 6(i)(2) of the Real Estate Settlement
23


Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2605(i)(2)).
24 (b) HOMEOWNER ASSISTANCE BY AGENCIES.—

__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2008, 06:03 AM
darrels joy's Avatar
darrels joy darrels joy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indian Springs
Posts: 5,964
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default

All the reports I heard said that the meeting broke down with loud yelling and that McCain never really said much during the whole meeting. That is true, but what he did say was that the "...House Republicans are right on this one."

All heck broke loose! The Democrats expected him to be political; not principled. How could he disappoint them? But McCain did disappoint: the Democrats, not the Republicans.
__________________

sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another Right Gone To Hell! HARDCORE General Posts 0 07-15-2005 10:12 AM
Who In The Hell Am I? HARDCORE Political Debate 0 05-23-2005 10:34 PM
No Way In Hell!! HARDCORE General Posts 0 07-03-2004 01:19 PM
The Hell With This reeb General Posts 4 10-27-2003 12:57 PM
What In The Name Of Hell? HARDCORE General Posts 13 08-01-2003 05:05 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.