US Admiral: China 'Pouring a Lot of Money' Into Anti-Ship Missiles Read more: US Adm

[Boats]

U.S. Admiral: China 'Pouring a Lot of Money' Into Anti-Ship Missiles
By: Theodore Bunker - Newsmax News - 01-29-21
Re: https://www.newsmax.com/world/global...29/id/1007834/

Photo: On site only
File photo taken during a military parade on Sept. 3, 2015, in Beijing shows China's Dongfeng 21D anti-ship ballistic missiles, capable of traveling more than 1,500 kilometers. (Kyodo via AP Images)

U.S. Vice Admiral Jeffrey Trussler said during a virtual event this week that America is closely watching China’s anti-ship ballistic missile program, which he said is an attempt to destabilize the region, USNI reports.

“I’m not going to get [into] much more detail of what we know and don’t know about” the missile program, Trussler, deputy chief of naval operations for information warfare, said during a virtual event being held by the Intelligence and National Security Alliance on Wednesday.

“But they’re pouring a lot of money in the ability to basically rim their coast in the South China Sea with anti-ship missile capability,” he continued. “It’s a destabilizing effort in the South China Sea, in the East China Sea, all those areas. When their claims of some of these contested islands – they’re militarizing those areas.”

The South China Morning Post reported last August that China’s People’s Liberation Army conducted a test-fire of a DF-26B missile and a DF-21D, which is known as an “aircraft carrier killer,” into an area in the South China Sea in between Hainan Island and the Paracel archipelago, which is disputed territory.

Trussler added, “That’s something we’re going to watch very closely. It’s something that confuses the international order and concerns the allies in the region. It’s one reason we work to keep the global commons open and the free flow of traffic. But when you see that – those are troubling developments. They’re probably aimed and specifically developed towards the United States Navy. So we watch them very closely. I hope they just keep pouring money into that type of thing. That may not be how we win the next war.”

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Three more International Relations & Related Stories:

* China-Taiwan Tensions Rise Days Into Biden Presidency
Re: https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/ta...hina-military-
planes/2021/01/24/id/1006925/

* China Accuses US of Show of Force with Taiwan Strait Passage
Re: https://www.newsmax.com/world/asia/c...31/id/1003724/

* China rises from Russian customer to competitor in arms industry
Re: https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Int...-arms-industry
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some Russian defense industry officials and analysts dispute SIPRI's findings, arguing that it is impossible to accurately calculate China's arms sales volume since it keeps information about its military-industrial complex under wraps. They also protest SIPRI's decision exclusion of Russian state technology conglomerate Rostec, one of the country's largest arms exporters, in its top 25 ranking.

Even so, few in Moscow deny that China is gaining ground fast, not just in terms of the quantity of arms produced but also quality.

Vadim Kozyulin, director of the Asian Security Project at the PIR Center, a Moscow-based think tank, told Nikkei Asia that China has already surpassed Russia in developing unmanned aerial vehicles, certain kinds of warships and possibly even hypersonic missiles -- an area of great pride for the Kremlin in recent years.

"We see that China is producing new weapon models very rapidly, releasing a new generation every 10 years like the Soviet Union once did," he said. "Under these circumstances, it is difficult for Russia to compete because we have a smaller budget which is only decreasing."

For much of the post-Cold War period, Russia has been China's primary arms supplier.

The two neighbors began cooperating in the early 1990s, when China had just launched an ambitious campaign to upgrade the PLA's outdated weaponry. Beijing initially looked to the West as a potential source of advanced military technology, but those hopes were dashed after the U.S. and Europe imposed an arms embargo against China in response to the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown.

China soon found a replacement in Russia. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 devastated Russian arms manufacturers. Old sources of revenue such as domestic military spending and lucrative contracts with foreign client states quickly dried up. China's emergence as a prospective customer provided Russia's ailing defense industry with a much-needed economic lifeline.

From 1992 to 2007, China imported 84% of its weapons from Russia, with the PLA procuring combat aircraft, air defense systems, destroyers and submarines.

Much to Moscow's chagrin, Beijing also reverse-engineered many of its Russian purchases.

Some of China's newest arms, most notably J-11 fighter jets and HQ-9 surface-to-air-missiles, appear to be nearly identical to earlier variants bought from Russia. In December 2019, Rostec publicly accused China of illegally copying a broad spectrum of Russian military technologies over the course of nearly two decades.

Despite these concerns, arms trade between the two countries continued to flourish. From 2014 to 2015, Moscow agreed to provide Beijing with six battalions of the S-400 air defense system and 24 Su-35 fighter jets, some of Russia's most advanced weapons.

Now, it is not clear how much longer China will need Russian arms. In the span of just 20 years, China's weapons sector has gone from fledgling industry to global heavyweight. Not only can Beijing meet most of its own military needs, but it also exports to customers ranging from Pakistan to Serbia.

China's rise as an arms producer has been bolstered by a rapid increase in military spending. According to SIPRI, China's defense budget expanded by 85% over the past decade, reaching $261 billion in 2019. Although Russia did raise its military spending under President Vladimir Putin in the past, the increase was far more modest, and defense expenditures have been gradually declining since 2015.

No less significant is Beijing's emergence as a technological power. China is home to 1.87 million scientific researchers, the most in the world, and a growing number of high tech giants such as Huawei, Tencent and ZTE.

Despite recent efforts by the Kremlin to stimulate the domestic tech sector, Russia has not enjoyed similar success. Experts warn that Russia is falling behind in key emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, and that unless that changes, its defense industry will have a difficult time keeping up with China and the U.S.

"Russia doesn't have giants like Microsoft or Huawei that produce technologies that can be used for civilian and military purposes," said Kozyulin of the PIR Center. "Instead, the government itself has to create everything from scratch, which is very costly."

As China has become more advanced, Russia has begun exploring opportunities to codevelop weaponry with Beijing. In 2016, the two countries partnered to develop and produce over 200 next-generation heavy lift helicopters for the PLA by 2040. Another major collaboration was announced in August, when Russia arms officials revealed that Moscow and Beijing had begun working on developing a new non-nuclear submarine.

"It's pretty clear that Russia is transitioning to a technology transferring and subcontracting role, since although China can now make many of its own systems, it still lacks Russia's tremendous amount of engineering experience and ability to develop a lot of key components," said Michael Kofman, director of the Russia program at the Washington-based CNA military research center.

But other experts are skeptical that such an arrangement is sustainable in the long run. Siemon Wezeman, a senior researcher at the SIPRI Arms and Military Expenditure Programme, argued that Moscow could be falling too far behind to keep Beijing interested.

"I expect the Russians to be completely out of the picture for the Chinese as a provider of technology within five to 10 years," he said. "The Russians will be looking to see if they can somehow get their hands on Chinese technology because the Russians are falling behind, and in some cases they're not getting anywhere anymore."

Wezeman added that in the long run, it is even possible that China will push Russian arms manufacturers out of their traditional markets in Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. He warned that China is well-positioned to outcompete Russia in these markets, since unlike Moscow, Beijing can bundle arms deals together with lucrative economic agreements.

"There is no real reason for those countries to go with the Russians if they can get something similar or better from the Chinese," Wezeman said. "In a way the Chinese probably have more to offer, not only in terms of the weapons, but also all kinds of other arrangements."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Added Personal note: This buddie system Russian and China has seems to be on a short leash of late. I'm really surprised NK isn't in the hunt or they are just very busy reverse engineering everyone's weapon designs to some degree or another?

Boats