The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > International > United Nations

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-2009, 01:52 PM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
Administrator
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 46,783
Distinctions
Special Projects VOM Staff Contributor 
Default UN: Questions about military aspects on Iran nukes

AP


VIENNA Iran is stonewalling the U.N. nuclear watchdog on "possible military dimensions" to its suspect nuclear program, officials said Friday, urging the regime to clarify the mysterious role of a foreign explosives expert and shed light on other issues.

A senior Iranian envoy angrily denounced the assessment as "fabrication," insisting his country has gone out of its way to be transparent and cooperative.

In its latest report, the International Atomic Energy Agency said it has pressed the Islamic Republic to clarify its uranium enrichment activities and reassure the world that it's not trying to build an atomic weapon.

Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and geared solely toward generating electricity. The United States and important allies contend the country is covertly trying to build an atomic weapon.

Before six-power talks on Iran on Sept. 2 and a key meeting of the IAEA's 35-nation board a week after that the IAEA acknowledged that Iran has been producing nuclear fuel at a slower rate and has allowed U.N. inspectors broader access to its main nuclear complex in the southern city of Natanz and to a reactor in Arak.

But the Vienna-based agency delivered a blunt assessment: "Iran has not suspended its enrichment-related activities."

"There remain a number of outstanding issues which give rise to concerns and which need to be clarified to exclude the existence of possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program," said the text, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press.

It said the IAEA "does not consider that Iran has adequately addressed the substance of the issues, having focused instead on the style and form ... and providing limited answers and simple denials."

The report contained a reference to a "foreign national with explosives expertise" who apparently assisted the Iranian nuclear program. It did not identify the expert by name or nationality, and officials pressed by the AP for details would not elaborate.

Iran's chief representative to the IAEA, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, told the AP he found the report "very frustrating," and angrily suggested that U.S. intelligence was working to undermine Iran's credibility.

"America alleges that Iran has a Manhattan Project" to build a bomb, Soltanieh said. "This is ridiculous. This game is enough. It should be over. ... We have tried to take a very logical and pragmatic approach."

"All these things are fabrications. We have been too transparent and cooperative with the agency," he added.

"We are very concerned that they are not addressing the concerns of the international community," U.S. State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said Friday in Washington.

"They say they want to have the right to a civilian nuclear energy program, but they also have the obligation to show the world that that is indeed what they intend to do," he said.

The report raised the specter of harsher international sanctions against Iran for not answering lingering questions about its nuclear activities.

President Barack Obama has given Iran something of an ultimatum: Stop enriching uranium which, if done at a high level, can produce fissile material for the core of a nuclear weapon or face harsher penalties. In exchange, it could get trade benefits from the six countries engaged in the talks: the United States, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia.

This week, German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned Iran that if it doesn't respond, it could face stronger sanctions in the energy and financial sectors.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, meanwhile, suggested unspecified "severe" new sanctions against Iran if it continues its nuclear activities.

Despite the pressure, senior U.N. officials said Friday that Iran has been feeding uranium ore into some of its 8,300 centrifuges at a reduced rate, suggesting that sanctions already in place may be hampering its program.

As of Aug. 12, only about 4,600 of those centrifuges were actively enriching uranium, compared with about 4,900 in June the last time the IAEA issued a report on Iran's nuclear activities officials said.

Since then, they said, Iran has installed roughly 1,000 more centrifuges, but it appeared that many were idle.

"We need further explanations," said a Western diplomat, declining to be identified because he was not authorized to publicly discuss the confidential report.

The U.N. Security Council has imposed sanctions against Iran three times since 2006 for its refusal to freeze uranium enrichment. The sanctions grew from fears that Iran is using the pretext of building a peaceful nuclear energy program as a guise to eventually make weapons-grade enriched uranium.

The country has also been placed on an international watch list to help limit the importation of nuclear materials, which could make it difficult to procure enough uranium oxide to feed its enrichment program.

The IAEA also chided Syria for not fully cooperating on efforts to clear up questions about whether it was trying to build a nuclear complex at a desert site bombed by Israel in 2007.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IAEA: Iran dismisses evidence on nukes David Nuclear/Biological/Chemical 0 02-22-2008 10:24 AM
EU Submits Iran Nukes Proposal David United Nations 0 09-24-2005 04:02 AM
Iran: U.S. Drones Spy On Nukes David General Posts 0 02-16-2005 04:29 PM
N. Korea, Iran Pressed On Nukes David United Nations 0 11-01-2004 11:21 AM
Questions About Bush's Military Service Linger Anonymous General 0 01-23-2004 06:25 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.