The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Branch Posts > Navy

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-07-2020, 08:57 AM
Boats's Avatar
Boats Boats is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sauk Village, IL
Posts: 21,784
Angry Destroyers left behind: US Navy cancels plans to extend service lives of its workhors

Destroyers left behind: US Navy cancels plans to extend service lives of its workhorse DDGs
By: David B. Larter - Defense News - 03-07-20
Re: https://www.defensenews.com/naval/20...orkhorse-ddgs/

Photo Link: https://www.armytimes.com/resizer/zW...GB6VPSMQMU.jpg
The Arleigh Burke-class destroyer Donald Cook sails alongside Georgian coast guard ships in the Black Sea. Cook is one of the early Flight I DDGs that will leave service in the early 2030s under a new plan to cancel a 10-year service life extension. (Navy photo by MC2 Ford Williams)

WASHINGTON – In a move with sweeping consequences for the US Navy’s battle force, the service is canceling plans to add 10 years to the expected service lives of their stalwart destroyer fleet, a cost-savings measure that would almost certainly hamper plans to grow the size of the fleet.

In written testimony submitted to the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Navy’s Assistant Secretary for Research, Development and Acquisition James Geurts said performing service life extensions on Burkes designed to bring them up from 35-year hull lives to 45 years was not cost effective.

“Service life extensions can be targeted, physical changes to specific hulls to gain a few more years, or a class-wide extension based on engineering analysis,” the testimony reads. “The Navy has evaluated the most effective balance between costs and capability to be removing the service life extension on the DDG 51 class.”

The Navy’s destroyers are the workhorses of the fleet, with sailors spending an average of one in every four days underway, the highest rate in the fleet, according a recent report from Defense News sister publication Navy Times.

The decision to ax the service life extensions for the Arleigh Burke class comes after years of assurances from Navy leaders that the destroyers would be modernized with an eye to growing the fleet over the coming decades. Navy leaders have offered assurances that the fiscal year 2021 budget continues to grow the fleet despite its significant cuts to shipbuilding and existing force structure, but it is unclear how the fleet will continue to grow past the next five years if service life extensions on the earliest Burkes don’t go forward right away.

It would also seem to have significant impact on the current push from Acting Secretary of the Navy Thomas Modly to grow the fleet to 355 ships in a decade.

In its FY2020 30-year shipbuilding plan, the Navy said extending the lives of the Arleigh Burkes was an imperative to growing the fleet to a battle force of 355 ships. Instead, the cancellation of the service life extensions means that between 2026 and 2034, the Navy is slated to lose 27 destroyers from its battle force.

Those losses would compound the impact of cutting 10 ships from the five-year projections in the 2021 budget, including five of the 12 proposed Flight III Arleigh Burke-class destroyers from the 2020 budget and a Virginia-class attack submarine.

The Defense Department has yet to submit its FY2021 30-year shipbuilding plan, which means that it’s impossible to tell how the Navy thinks these cuts would affect its total ship count in the years when it would lose Burkes at a rate of more than three per year. But the Burke retirements would begin in 2026 or 2027, years just after the service had completed shedding 13 cruisers from its fleet, leaving just nine of the Navy’s largest combatants in the fleet.

In a statement, Capt. Danny Hernandez, spokesman for Geurts, said there are a lot of variable in getting the fleet to its goal of 355 ships, but that the Navy’s top priority is keeping the recapitalization of its retiring Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines on track.

“Like Navy leaders have stated during testimony, the tradeoffs were complex to get the right balance,” Hernandez said.

Service Lives

According to a Naval Sea Systems Command document obtained by Defense News in 2018, the earliest Arleigh Burke destroyers – 27 so-called Flight I destroyers – have an expected hull life of 35 years. The lead ship, the Arleigh Burke, was commissioned in 1991, meaning its hull life is up in 2026.

DDG-51 through DDG-78 – the Flight Is – were commissioned between 1991 and 1999. Later models – Flight II and Flight IIA – have 40-year hull lives.

In 2018, then-Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems Vice Adm. Bill Merz told USNI News that there were distinct advantages to upgrading the entire class, and that instead of just a combat systems modernization aimed at boosting ballistic missile defense systems, the ships would get the full hull and mechanical upgrades that would extend the ships out to 45 year service lives.

“This is an HM&E (hull, mechanical and electrical) extension, but every destroyer is already in the modernization pipeline, so every destroyer will be modernized,” Merz said. “The modernization they receive that’s already programmed may carry them through.

“Obviously, the threat’s going to get a vote on that, but one of the beauties is, instead of doing an individual ship-by-ship extension and extending the entire class, now we have the visibility to actually plan for that. We can pace it, plan it, fund it efficiently instead of one-and-done, one-and-done, one-and-done. We can be a lot more deliberate about how we handle this class.”

In testimony that year, Merz said ballistic missile defense was the biggest requirement driving the retention of the DDGs to 45 years. Compounded with cuts to the Flight III destroyers, it seems likely that the Navy by 2034 will have a significantly reduced ballistic missile defense capability with at least 32 fewer BMD-capable destroyers in the fleet, if this budget is enacted.

When asked during its FY2021 budget rollout if the cutting of five Flight III DDGs corresponded to a reduction in demand for ballistic missile defense-capable ships, Navy budget director Rear Adm. Randy Crites told reporters it was a decision based on “strictly affordability.”

Bryan Clark, a retired submarine officer and senior fellow at the Hudson Institute who recently authored a study with the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments that called for canceling the DDG service life extensions, said the cuts were a necessary step toward.

“It’s crazy to throw good money after bad for a bunch of ships you say you don’t need,” Clark said. “I think the Navy is coming to grips with the fiscal realities; the unsustainable nature of their current plan; and the recognition is going to have a need for fewer large surface combatants in the future and needs to husband its resources to build a larger fleet of smaller surface combatants. Those are going to be the bulk of the distributed force they intend to have.”

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Personal note: I think their all NUT's! You need shallow draft ships to get in and do their jobs. They are faster than anything and can maneuver shallow waters plus they can protect landing craft and the heavies at sea. The can screen the big carrier's and also provide decent fire power. When did we become a throw away country. Some in the big house isn't playing with a full deck. You better think this over before building more capital ships that need tin cans for protection and supply ships. What the hell is wrong with brain power in Washington?

Boats
__________________
Boats

O Almighty Lord God, who neither slumberest nor sleepest; Protect and assist, we beseech thee, all those who at home or abroad, by land, by sea, or in the air, are serving this country, that they, being armed with thy defence, may be preserved evermore in all perils; and being filled with wisdom and girded with strength, may do their duty to thy honour and glory; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

"IN GOD WE TRUST"
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.