The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General > Military Weapons

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-05-2003, 03:19 PM
ArtySgt ArtySgt is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 387
Default Colmurph

My wife bought me a military rifle while I was in the hospital as a surprise, and guess what ? I'm surprised.... Thought you could identify it for me. British enfield, cal 308. Markings on the lower band at trigger guard. RIFLE 62mm2A1 Next line below: R.F.I.
1967 all the parts seem to have matching numbers. It has a box 10 round magazine. Nothing on the breech of the rifle where most other military rifles are marked. Markings on the rear sight are; ICR 1559 and again R.F.I.
What do I have ? Safe to shoot ?
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 08-05-2003, 04:43 PM
Keith_Hixson's Avatar
Keith_Hixson Keith_Hixson is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington, the state
Posts: 5,022
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Talking safe to shoot?

It all depends on your aim.


Keith


P.S. Sorry I just couldn't resist.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-06-2003, 05:48 PM
ArtySgt ArtySgt is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 387
Default

OK, you got me. Good one.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2003, 09:10 AM
colmurph's Avatar
colmurph colmurph is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,047
Default

Sounds to me that you have a Short Model Lee Enfield bolt action rifle that's been converted from .303 to the NATO round. It should be safe to shoot as the Enfield has a pretty strong action and the .303 is not all that different from the .308 as far as chamber pressures go. Only difference, basically is that the .303 is a rimmed cartrige and the .308 is rimless.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2003, 01:23 PM
Keith_Hixson's Avatar
Keith_Hixson Keith_Hixson is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington, the state
Posts: 5,022
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Post Col Murphy

My Research on the Internet indicates that the 2A1 was a special version of the The Standard Enfield manufacture in India in the 1960's so the British Army could have a 7.62 NATO shoulder arm.

They should have just bought M-14 from US. Which would have been a better choice of infantry weapon. But they wanted their own weapon built their own way.

They were chambered from the factory as a 7.62 NATO. I agree, it should be safe to shoot unless its been abused.

Sporterize it for a good deer and elk gun. Or keep it as a collectors piece. Will work either way.

Keith
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2003, 02:44 PM
ArtySgt ArtySgt is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 387
Default

Keith, thanks for the info, won't sporterize a military weapon, but for my needs it is good just as it is.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2003, 04:17 PM
Keith_Hixson's Avatar
Keith_Hixson Keith_Hixson is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington, the state
Posts: 5,022
Distinctions
VOM Contributor 
Post Back in 1966

As a kid I got a Springfield 1903A3 and spent a couple hundred bucks sporterizing it. Could have gotten a Winchester, Savage, or Remington and stuck a scope on it much cheaper than going through all the sporterizing. However I do have an adjustable trigger on it which I can take down to a half pound pull. I keep the setting at a little over a pound. Makes for much more accurate shooting. Wish I had a complete military 1903 Springfield. Wouldn't do it again.

Keith
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-21-2003, 09:08 AM
colmurph's Avatar
colmurph colmurph is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,047
Default

"Sporterizing" has driven the value of non-sporterized military rifles through the roof! I have an "Original as Issued" condition U.S. Springfield Krag/Jorgensen in .30-40 cal. It's now worth around $1,300.00 because so many of them were soprterized in the 20's and 30's when they could be had from Bannermans at around $5.00 a pop. In the 40's according to some old timer's I know, you could get an 1861 or 1863 Springfield Civil War Musket at Bannermans for around $7.50. (Today one in good condition is around $2,500.00)
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-21-2003, 09:15 AM
Tamaroa's Avatar
Tamaroa Tamaroa is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Lower New York State
Posts: 635
Distinctions
Contributor 
Default For comparative purposes..........

In 1964 I purchased an oval US belt plate with arrow hooks on the back from Dixie Gunworks for $4.00. The same buckle is going for between $250 to $275 in good condition now. Prices are getting crazy all around.

Bill
__________________
"Zounds! I was never so bethumped with words."

King John 2.1.466
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Happy Birthday to the ColMurph reeb General Posts 15 12-04-2004 05:24 PM
ColMurph, M-70 Pistol from Yugoslavia-Think it's a Milsurplus ArtySgt Military Weapons 3 04-05-2004 04:26 AM
COLMurph catman Military Weapons 5 03-16-2004 02:21 PM
COLMURPH, couple of questions for you ArtySgt Military Weapons 6 06-10-2003 02:14 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.