#1
|
|||
|
|||
Colmurph
My wife bought me a military rifle while I was in the hospital as a surprise, and guess what ? I'm surprised.... Thought you could identify it for me. British enfield, cal 308. Markings on the lower band at trigger guard. RIFLE 62mm2A1 Next line below: R.F.I.
1967 all the parts seem to have matching numbers. It has a box 10 round magazine. Nothing on the breech of the rifle where most other military rifles are marked. Markings on the rear sight are; ICR 1559 and again R.F.I. What do I have ? Safe to shoot ? |
Sponsored Links |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
safe to shoot?
It all depends on your aim.
Keith P.S. Sorry I just couldn't resist. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
OK, you got me. Good one.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Sounds to me that you have a Short Model Lee Enfield bolt action rifle that's been converted from .303 to the NATO round. It should be safe to shoot as the Enfield has a pretty strong action and the .303 is not all that different from the .308 as far as chamber pressures go. Only difference, basically is that the .303 is a rimmed cartrige and the .308 is rimless.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Col Murphy
My Research on the Internet indicates that the 2A1 was a special version of the The Standard Enfield manufacture in India in the 1960's so the British Army could have a 7.62 NATO shoulder arm.
They should have just bought M-14 from US. Which would have been a better choice of infantry weapon. But they wanted their own weapon built their own way. They were chambered from the factory as a 7.62 NATO. I agree, it should be safe to shoot unless its been abused. Sporterize it for a good deer and elk gun. Or keep it as a collectors piece. Will work either way. Keith |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Keith, thanks for the info, won't sporterize a military weapon, but for my needs it is good just as it is.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Back in 1966
As a kid I got a Springfield 1903A3 and spent a couple hundred bucks sporterizing it. Could have gotten a Winchester, Savage, or Remington and stuck a scope on it much cheaper than going through all the sporterizing. However I do have an adjustable trigger on it which I can take down to a half pound pull. I keep the setting at a little over a pound. Makes for much more accurate shooting. Wish I had a complete military 1903 Springfield. Wouldn't do it again.
Keith |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
"Sporterizing" has driven the value of non-sporterized military rifles through the roof! I have an "Original as Issued" condition U.S. Springfield Krag/Jorgensen in .30-40 cal. It's now worth around $1,300.00 because so many of them were soprterized in the 20's and 30's when they could be had from Bannermans at around $5.00 a pop. In the 40's according to some old timer's I know, you could get an 1861 or 1863 Springfield Civil War Musket at Bannermans for around $7.50. (Today one in good condition is around $2,500.00)
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
For comparative purposes..........
In 1964 I purchased an oval US belt plate with arrow hooks on the back from Dixie Gunworks for $4.00. The same buckle is going for between $250 to $275 in good condition now. Prices are getting crazy all around.
Bill
__________________
"Zounds! I was never so bethumped with words." King John 2.1.466 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Happy Birthday to the ColMurph | reeb | General Posts | 15 | 12-04-2004 05:24 PM |
ColMurph, M-70 Pistol from Yugoslavia-Think it's a Milsurplus | ArtySgt | Military Weapons | 3 | 04-05-2004 04:26 AM |
COLMurph | catman | Military Weapons | 5 | 03-16-2004 02:21 PM |
COLMURPH, couple of questions for you | ArtySgt | Military Weapons | 6 | 06-10-2003 02:14 PM |
|