The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > General > Political Debate

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2021, 04:53 AM
Boats's Avatar
Boats Boats is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sauk Village, IL
Posts: 21,784
Question Democrats renew push for war powers overhaul after Biden’s Syria strike

Democrats renew push for war powers overhaul after Biden’s Syria strike
By: Conner O'Brian - Politico News - 02-26-21
Re: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...20Bird%20Brief

“Offensive military action without congressional approval is not constitutional absent extraordinary circumstances,” Kaine said.

The Biden administration is taking heat from fellow Democrats as lawmakers pressure the White House to provide a legal justification for an airstrike launched Thursday against Iran-backed militia groups in Syria.

The White House is pledging to provide a classified briefing early next week and argued the airstrike was consistent with Biden's constitutional authority to defend the U.S. But the attack has given new ammunition to lawmakers who want to roll back broad presidential war powers authorized two decades ago.

Two Senate war powers critics — Democrats Tim Kaine of Virginia and Chris Murphy of Connecticut — argued Friday that lawmakers need to know why President Joe Biden ordered the attack without first consulting them.


"The American people deserve to hear the Administration’s rationale for these strikes and its legal justification for acting without coming to Congress," said Kaine, who sits on the Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees.

"Offensive military action without congressional approval is not constitutional absent extraordinary circumstances," he added. "Congress must be fully briefed on this matter expeditiously."

Murphy, a Foreign Relations Committee member, added in a statement that "retaliatory strikes, not necessary to prevent an imminent threat, must fall within the definition of an existing congressional authorization of military force."

"Congress should hold this administration to the same standard it did prior administrations, and require clear legal justifications for military action, especially inside theaters like Syria, where Congress has not explicitly authorized any American military action," Murphy said.

Kaine and Murphy have long pushed to repeal the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force and the 2002 Iraq War authorization and institute new guidelines for Congress to approve military action.

Progressive Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), the only lawmaker to vote against the 2001 authorization in the days following 9/11, said the Syria strike highlights the need to remove old war powers from the books and return to nuclear talks with Iran.

"The strike in Syria underscores the urgent need to get back to the table with Iran and revive the JCPOA," Lee said, referring to the Iran nuclear deal. "It also underscores the urgent need to repeal the blank check for endless wars — the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs — which are now almost 20 years old."

"Let’s be clear: this is not about this president or any other president, it is about the need to restore the balance of power with Congress in the use of military force," Lee said.

Lee, who chairs the House panel that controls funding for the State Department and foreign aid programs, is leading an effort with other senior House Democrats to convince Biden to team with Congress to kill the 2002 Iraq authorization and craft a suitable replacement for the 2001 authorization, which underpins numerous U.S. counterterrorism operations worldwide.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a progressive member of the House Armed Services Committee, slammed Biden following the attack. Khanna, who pushed legislation to curtail Trump's ability to take military action against Iran, argued there was "absolutely no justification" for the Syria strike.

"This makes President Biden the seventh consecutive U.S. president to order strikes in the Middle East," Khanna lamented.

"We need to extricate from the Middle East, not escalate. The President should not be taking these actions without seeking explicit authorization instead of relying on broad, outdated [AUMFs]," Khanna said. "I spoke against endless war with Trump, and I will speak out against it when we have a Democratic President."

The Pentagon briefed congressional leadership on Thursday night ahead of the attack, a spokesperson for the White House National Security Council said, and administration officials on Friday continued briefing lawmakers and congressional staff.

The administration will provide a full classified briefing to lawmakers early next week, though it could come "sooner if Congress wants it," the spokesperson added.

The spokesperson pointed to the "inherent self-defense powers enshrined in our Constitution and the UN Charter," citing Biden's authority to defend the U.S. under Article II of the Constitution as well as Article 51 of the UN Charter.

"We had a rigorous process to include legal review of the strikes conducted," the NSC spokesperson said. "The strikes were necessary to address the threat and proportionate to the prior attacks."

Thursday's airstrike in Syria came in response to three rocket attacks against U.S. personnel in Iraq in the span of a week. The new U.S. strike targeted facilities in eastern Syria used by Iranian-backed militia groups that were linked to the recent attacks on U.S. forces.

Though some lawmakers in both parties hailed Biden's decision as a necessary move to deter threats by Iran and its proxy forces in the region, opponents of expansive presidential war powers questioned the legal justification for the attack and criticized the new president for conducting the airstrike without consulting Congress.

In the hours following the airstrike, top GOP hawks on Capitol Hill backed Biden's decision.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said in a statement Friday that the president "acted well within the authorities of his office." Still, McConnell called for more information to assess the efficacy of the strikes and what kind of fallback may result with Iran.

"President Biden has an opportunity to craft a strong, effective, enduring, and bipartisan approach to Iran," McConnell wrote.

Senate Armed Services ranking Republican Jim Inhofe praised Biden and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin in a statement, arguing the administration elected "to continue the approach" set by former President Donald Trump.

"Yesterday’s strikes were the correct, proportionate response to protect American lives, and I look forward to more information on the administration’s response to Iran’s aggression," Inhofe said.

Rep. Mike Rogers of Alabama, the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, said Biden's decision "showed that attacks on American personnel and interests will not be tolerated."

"We must defend our interests abroad, and I hope the Biden Administration continues to apply pressure to deter future aggression from Iran and its proxies," Rogers said.

Natasha Bertrand contributed to this report.
__________________
Boats

O Almighty Lord God, who neither slumberest nor sleepest; Protect and assist, we beseech thee, all those who at home or abroad, by land, by sea, or in the air, are serving this country, that they, being armed with thy defence, may be preserved evermore in all perils; and being filled with wisdom and girded with strength, may do their duty to thy honour and glory; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

"IN GOD WE TRUST"
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.