|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Who Cares about the Civil War? by Harry Browne
Who Cares about the Civil War?
by Harry Browne July 31, 2002 I believe an understanding of the Civil War has great relevance to the future of liberty in America. It may be the most misunderstood of all American wars. And so much of what we lament today ? government intrusions on civil liberties, unlimited taxation, corporate welfare, disregarding of the Constitution, funny money ? date back to programs started during the Civil War. Although slavery was an ever-present political issue in the early 1800s, it wasn't the immediate cause of the war. In fact, Abraham Lincoln in his first inaugural address vowed that he wouldn't interfere with slavery. He also said the North wouldn't invade the South unless necessary to collect taxes. Before the war, the main concern about slavery was whether new states and territories would come into the Union as free states or slave states. This affected the balance of power in Congress, and both Northerners and Southerners worried that the other region might dominate Congress. Taxes Why then was the Civil War fought? As with most wars, there's no single answer. But the predominant cause was taxation. Before his election, Lincoln had promoted very high tariffs (federal taxes on foreign imports), using the receipts to build railroads, canals, roads, and other federal pork-barrel projects. The tariffs protected Northern manufacturers from foreign competition, and were paid mostly by the non-manufacturing South, while most of the proposed boondoggles were to be built in the North. Thus the South was being forced to subsidize Northern corporate welfare. Certainly the Southerners were concerned about the future of slavery. But there was no threat in 1861 that the federal government would be able to outlaw it. Secession When Lincoln was elected, South Carolina saw a grim future ahead and seceded. Other Southern states quickly followed suit. Lincoln asserted that no state had a right to secede from the Union ? even though several geographical regions had considered secession before. Few people thought the Union couldn't survive if some states decided to leave. Upon seceding, the Confederates took over all federal forts and other facilities in the South, with no opposition from Lincoln. The last remaining federal facilities were Fort Pickens in Florida and Fort Sumter in South Carolina. Lincoln at first promised to let the South have Fort Sumter, but then tried to reinforce it. The South moved to confiscate it ? shelling the Fort for many hours. (No one was killed or even seriously injured.) Why was Fort Sumter important? Because it was a major tariff-collecting facility in the harbor at Charleston. So long as the Union controlled it, the South would still have to pay Lincoln's oppressive tariffs. Although there had been only scattered Northern opposition to the secessions, the shelling of Fort Sumter (like the bombing of Pearl Harbor almost a century later) incited many Northerners to call for war against the South. The South's seizure of Fort Sumter caused many Northerners to notice that the South would no longer be subsidizing Northern manufacturing. As the war began, the sole issue was restoration of the Union ? not ending slavery. Only in 1863 did the Emancipation Proclamation go into effect, and it didn't actually free a single slave ? just like so many laws today that don't perform the purpose for which they were promoted. . The Damage The Lincoln Presidency imposed a police state upon America ? North and South. He shut down newspapers that disagreed with him, suspended habeas corpus, imprisoned civilians without trials, and went to war ? all without Congressional authority. Just as future Presidents would do, he used the war as an excuse to increase government dramatically. He rewarded his political friends with pork-barrel projects, flooded the country with paper money, established a national banking system to finance a large federal debt, and imposed the first income tax. He also destroyed the balance between the executive and Congressional branches, and between the federal government and the states. He set in motion many precedents we suffer from today. That's why it's important to understand the Civil War for what it was, not what the mythmakers want it to be. Alternatives Was slavery an evil? Of course. Is it a blessing that it ended? Of course. Was it necessary for 140,414 people to die in order to end slavery? Definitely not. The U.S. was the only western country that ended slavery through violence ? outside of Haiti (where it ended through a slave revolt). During the 19th century dozens of nations ended slavery peaceably. What Was Lincoln? Was Lincoln opposed to slavery? Yes, he became an abolitionist in the mid-1850s, although he said he didn't know how slavery could be ended. Lincoln's fans have portrayed him as the Great Emancipator, Honest Abe, who with great courage and single-minded determination fought a Civil War to free the slaves. Many of his detractors have tried to show that he was actually a racist. I think it's important to understand that, more than anything else, he was a politician. Throughout his career he shaded the truth for political advantage, he played both sides against the middle, he lied about his opponents, and he used government force to get what he wanted. Like so many politicians, he continually uttered platitudes about liberty while doing everything in his power to curtail it. His idolaters applaud him for being a dictatorial politician, saying this was precisely what America needed in 1861. No historian believes he acted within the Constitution. Importance of Studying the Civil War I believe the study of the origins and conduct of the Civil War is an important part of a libertarian education. Although the Progressive era, the New Deal, and the Great Society each caused government growth to accelerate, only the Civil War caused a complete break with the past. It transformed a federation of states into a national government. It introduced the elements of big government that later movements would build on. And it set in motion the disregard for the Constitution that's taken for granted today. You'll also find parallels between the Civil War and today's War on Terrorism. Lincoln and the Civil War are fascinating subjects. I've read numerous books about them, and I can highly recommend two recent books that provide an excellent introduction. Jeffrey Hummel's book "Emancipating Slaves, Enslaving Free Men" (published in 1996) and Thomas DiLorenzo's "The Real Lincoln" (2002) are both well-documented and very well-written. You'll find reading either of them (or both) to be an adventure, rather than a task. Hummel's book is longer, more complete, and perhaps more balanced. DiLorenzo's is faster reading. Both are well worth their inexpensive prices. Happy reading! Harry Browne was the Libertarian Party presidential candidate in 1996 and 2000. He is now the Director of Public Policy for the American Liberty Foundation. You can read more of his articles at www.HarryBrowne.org. His latest book is Fail-Safe Investing. ---------------/ | \------------------------------------ I found this on Dixie Daily News and thought it interesting, Jerry |
Sponsored Links |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
The 140,000 figure was quoted as deaths in the Civil War. Here are the real figures. Excellent article.
Forget, Hell ! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.civilwarhome.com/casualties.htm The Price in Blood! Casualties in the Civil War At least 618,000 Americans died in the Civil War, and some experts say the toll reached 700,000. The number that is most often quoted is 620,000. At any rate, these casualties exceed the nation's loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. The Union armies had from 2,500,000 to 2,750,000 men. Their losses, by the best estimates: Battle deaths: 110,070 Disease, etc.: 250,152 Total 360,222 The Confederate strength, known less accurately because of missing records, was from 750,000 to 1,250,000. Its estimated losses: Battle deaths: 94,000 Disease, etc.: 164,000 Total 258,000 The leading authority on casualties of the war, Thomas L. Livermore, admitting the handicap of poor records in some cases, studied 48 of the war's battles and concluded: Of every 1,000 Federals in battle, 112 were wounded. Of every 1,000 Confederates, 150 were hit. Mortality was greater among Confederate wounded, because of inferior medical service. The great battles, in terms of their toll in dead, wounded, and missing is listed on this site: The Ten Costliest Battles of the Civil War. Some of the great blood baths of the war came as Grant drove on Richmond in the spring of 1864- Confederate casualties are missing for this campaign, but were enormous. The Federal toll: The Wilderness, May 5-7: 17,666 Spotsylvania, May 10 and 12: 10,920 Drewry's Bluff, May 12-16 4,160 Cold Harbor, June 1-3: 12,000 Petersburg, June 15-30 16,569 These total 61,315, with rolls of the missing incomplete. The Appomattox campaign, about ten days of running battles ending April 9, 1865, cost the Union about 11,000 casualties, and ended in the surrender of Lee's remnant of 26,765. Confederate dead and wounded in the meantime were about 6,500. Lesser battles are famous for their casualties. At Franklin, Tennessee, November 30, 1864, General Hood's Confederates lost over 6,000 of 21,000 effectives -most of them in about two hours. Six Confederate generals died there. Hood lost about 8,ooo men in his assault before Atlanta, July 22, 1864; Sherman's Union forces lost about 3,800. The small battle of Wilson's Creek, Missouri, August 10, 1861, was typical of the savagery of much of the war's fighting. The Union force Of 5,400 men lost over 1,200; the Confederates, over 11,000 strong, lost about the same number. The first battle of Manassas/Bull Run, though famous as the first large engagement, was relatively light in cost: 2,708 for the Union, 1,981 for the Confederates. The casualty rolls struck home to families and regiments. The Confederate General, John B. Gordon, cited the case of the Christian family, of Christiansburg, Virginia, which suffered eighteen dead in the war. The 1st Maine Heavy Artillery, in a charge at Petersburg, Virginia, 18 June, 1864, sustained a "record" loss of the war-635 of its 9oo men within seven minutes. Another challenger is the 26th North Carolina, which lost 714, of its 800 men at Gettysburg-in numbers and percentage the war's greatest losses. On the first day this regiment lost 584 dead and wounded, and when roll was called the next morning for G Company, one man answered, and he had been knocked unconscious by a shell burst the day before. This roll was called by a sergeant who lay on a stretcher with a severe leg wound. The 24th Michigan, a gallant Federal regiment which was in front of the North Carolinians on the first day, lost 362 of its 496 men. More than 3,000 horses were killed at Gettysburg, and one artillery battalion, the 9th Massachusetts, lost 80 of its 88 animals in the Trostle farmyard. A brigade from Vermont lost 1,645 Of its 2,100 men during a week of fighting in the Wilderness. The Irish Brigade, Union, had a total muster Of 7,000 during the war, and returned to New York in '65 with 1,000. One company was down to seven men. The 69th New York of this brigade lost 16 of 19 officers, and had 75 per cent casualties among enlisted men. In the Irish Brigade, Confederate, from Louisiana, Company A dwindled from go men to 3 men and an officer in March, '65. Company B went from 100 men to 2. Experts have pointed out that the famed Light Brigade at Balaklava lost only 36.7 per cent of its men, and that at least 63 Union regiments lost as much as 50 per cent in single battles. At Gettysburg 23 Federal regiments suffered losses of more than half their strength, including the well-known Iron Brigade (886 of 1,538 engaged). Many terrible casualty tolls were incurred in single engagements, like that of the Polish Regiment of Louisiana at Frayser's Farm during the Seven Days, where the outfit was cut to pieces and had to be consolidated with the 20th Louisiana. In this action one company of the Poles lost 33 of 42 men. One authority reports that Of 3,530 Indians who fought for the Union, 1,018 were killed, a phenomenally high rate. Of 178,975 Negro Union troops, this expert says, over 36,000 died. Some regimental losses in battle: Regiment Battle Strength Per Cent 1st Texas, CSA Antietam 226 82.3 1st Minnesota, US Gettysburg 262 82 21st Georgia, CSA Manassas 242 76 141st Pennsylvania, US Gettysburg 198 75.7 101st New York, US Manassas 168 73.8 6th Mississippi, CSA Shiloh 425 70.5 25th Massachusetts, US Cold Harbor 310 70 36th Wisconsin, US Bethesda Church 240 69 20th Massachusetts, US Fredericksburg 238 68.4 8th Tennessee, CSA Stone's River 444 68.7 10th Tennessee, CSA Chickamauga 328 68 8th Vermont, US Cedar Creek 156 67.9 Palmetto Sharpshooters, CSA Frayser's Farm 215 67.7 81st Pennsylvania, US Fredericksburg 261 67.4 Scores of other regiments on both sides registered losses in single engagements of above 50 per cent. Confederate losses by states, in dead and wounded only, and with many records missing (especially those of Alabama): North Carolina 20,602 Virginia 6,947 Mississippi 6,807 South Carolina 4,760 Arkansas 3,782 Georgia 3,702 Tennessee 3,425 Louisiana 3,059 Texas 1,260 Florida 1,047 Alabama 724 (Statisticians recognize these as fragmentary, from a report of 1866; they serve as a rough guide to relative losses by states). In addition to its dead and wounded from battle and disease, the Union listed: Deaths in Prison 24,866 Drowning 4,944 Accidental deaths 4,144 Murdered 520 Suicides 391 Sunstroke 313 Military executions 267 Killed after capture 104 Executed by enemy 64 Unclassified 14,155 Source: "The Civil War, Strange and Fascinating Facts," by Burke Davis RETURN TO CIVIL WAR POTPOURRI
__________________
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
The Casualty #'s are larger for the WBTS i.e.the civil war then all the other wars combined it seems. When some start talking about Slave Reparations I say what is the price of all these Americans that died for a cause? Some died for State rights, some died to preserve the Union and even some died to free the slaves but they all died to defend their family and homes. They all paid the price in blood.
__________________
[><] Dixie born and proud of it. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
17 Sept. again. Harry... | Doc.2/47 | Vietnam | 3 | 09-18-2006 07:45 PM |
Someone in Washington who cares dies. | Rebelwitho | General Posts | 1 | 05-12-2006 10:11 PM |
For Harry and our KIA'S | Doc.2/47 | Vietnam | 5 | 11-15-2005 08:03 AM |
Harry Bensinger | splummer | Vietnam | 13 | 03-27-2005 04:57 PM |
Is that Civil Service or Civil Serve-Us? | colmurph | General Posts | 19 | 01-27-2004 01:17 AM |
|