Lucky John, Lucky Jane

[SuperScout]

From my readings in case law and other reasoned sources, it appears that legal scholars and other learned souls agree that a charge of treason, as defined in the U.S. Constitution, can only be brought against perps during a period of declared war. For those without sources to the word about what defines 'treason,' kindly allow me to quote from the "Random House Dictionary of the English Language": " ... b. U.S. such a violation directed against the United States, and consisting 'only in levying war against them or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.' Not surprisingly, the U. S. Constitution cites the exact same words in Article III, Section 3, adding " ... No person shall be covicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court."

As we are all painfully aware, John F. Kerry, aka Teddy Jane Kerry, and Jane Fonda, aka the Red Bitch, both committed acts that under a declared war condition, could be construed and interpreted as treasonous. To date, Kerry has not recanted his previous efforts to give aid and comfort to the enemy. And yet this is the cretin that liberals, the misguided, the uninformed, or some others want elected to the highest office in our land. A man who committed treasonous acts against his fellow warriors? Under the rules of a declared war, they both would have been executed, and rightfully so. So now, they'e lucky, and America is the worse because of them.

[SuperScout]

.... Socialists Join Communists in Backing Kerry

We've already reported how Communist Party USA has endorsed John Kerry for president, and now we're pleased to note that Democratic Socialists (isn't that redundant?) of America has chimed in as well.

"Kerry was hardly the first choice of our members. Most supported Dennis Kucinich or Howard Dean in the Democratic primary elections and would be very critical of Senator Kerry's voting record on trade issues, as well as his support for the resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq; but the most important concern of our members now is to defeat Bush," said Frank Llewellyn, the socialists' national director.

[39mto39g]

Declairing war makes a big difference in a buch of stuff when in a conflict with a country.
Jane and John and anyone else that talk crap on the United States and or its military would have to deal with the "ROPE" if they would spout off in a declaired war.
Even if you don't agree with what the military is doing, you don't say that in public, that just hurts our own Brothers and Sisters fighting for the rights that the people that don't agree are useing.


Ron

[SuperScout]

Roger your last, to which I add, AMEN!

It's not just our brother and sisters in harms way, helping to preserve this great and blessed land, but on a more personal note, my wife and I have two sons on active duty, one in the Taji area of Iraq, even as we speak.

What appears to lost on some folks is who's backing whom in this upcoming election. And I haven't seen or heard of John Kerry disavowing the support of the Communist Party USA or the Democratic Socialist party either; maybe he likes them too much?

[firemedic]

Originally posted by SuperScout .... Socialists Join Communists in Backing Kerry

We've already reported how Communist Party USA has endorsed John Kerry for president, and now we're pleased to note that Democratic Socialists (isn't that redundant?) of America has chimed in as well.

"Kerry was hardly the first choice of our members. Most supported Dennis Kucinich or Howard Dean in the Democratic primary elections and would be very critical of Senator Kerry's voting record on trade issues, as well as his support for the resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq; but the most important concern of our members now is to defeat Bush," said Frank Llewellyn, the socialists' national director.

I'm wondering if Kerry (being the american war hero that he is) will publicly disavow the support of these two 'unamerican' orgainizations. I also wonder how much press this will get in the mainstreet media - NOT!
Once again , Kerry shows that he has no personal convictions other than wanting to be in power...at any cost or price. I hope the silent majority in this country lets him know how they really feel about his VN record in November.

[reconeil]

There should be no doubt whatsoever that if coming to light in the mainstream media also, Kerry will PUBLICLY denounce any such similarly Democrat Leftist or Socialist Organizations or Parties. Hey,...ANYTHING FOR A VOTE, even if publicly denying lifelong and likeminded friends and anti-American protestor soul mates.

Regardless, and just like The Clintons and all other Kennedy and Kerry types,...you-can-bet-your-bottom-dollar that Kerry undoubtedly welcomes such likeminded support. Behind the scenes and secretively (where such political phonnies connive best) Kerry will no doubt show great appreciation for any such support and any campaign contributions also,...even though needing more monies like another hole-in-the-head.

Besides, and whom disavows whom (or not),...A LEFTIST IS A LEFTIST, IS A LEFTIST. Sure Communists Leftists are a little more harsher than Socialist Leftists. But, so what? Leftists in general demand that all think alike in that The State is Supreme and/or all-knowing of what's best for everyone, and that such should never to be questioned,...just like The American Dems/Libs/Leftists/Socialists pretty-much and normally demand of their duped followers.

Neil

I wish John McCain would have won th Republican nomination. I think he would have made a better President then either Bush or Kerry. At first I was thinking of John Kerry, then I read his Winter Soldier speech to Congress. It turned me right off.

[SuperScout]

Kerry Wins Endorsement from Sandinista Thug

John Kerry has picked up the endorsement of a terrorist-friendly Sandinista leader notorious for his brutality when his old Communist regime still ruled Nicaragua.

"The most eye-popping Kerry endorsement last week came from T?mas Borge, one of the nine commandantes of Nicaragua's famed Sandinista revolution and perhaps the most feared," reported Wall Street Journal's Mary Anastasia O'Grady just hours after Kerry accepted his party's nomination in Boston.

During a 25th anniversary celebration of the Sandinista revolution last week, Borge declared that President Bush was "demented, crazy and paranoid." But the aging rebel told the gathering that Kerry was somebody he looked forward to doing business with as president of the United States, calling the top Democrat "a more sensible and balanced man, [who] would improve relations between the U.S. and us."

Borge's warm feeling toward Kerry undoubtedly emanates from the trip Kerry and Sen. Tom Harkin made to Nicaragua in 1986 to urge then-Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega not to knuckle under to Reagan administration pressure on their Communist regime.

A week later, Ortega traveled to Moscow to get his marching orders from the Politboro, leaving Kerry and his fellow Dems with major egg on their faces.

Years after the Sandinstas were voted out of office in U.S.-backed elections, Borge was still arming for a return to power and was discovered with a cache of surface-to-air missiles in 1993 in apparent preparation for a new war.

The new Kerry backer also ran a kidnap ring and has ties to Basque terrorists in Spain, the Journal said.

[SuperScout]

John Kerry: Anti-American War Hero
By Henry Mark Holzer and Erika Holzer

In the run-up to his nomination as the Democratic Party?s candidate for the presidency, John Kerry has been justly criticized for his phony Vietnam war record, his blatant anti-war activities back home, and his opposition to virtually every proposal to strengthen America militarily. Now that he has become the nominee, even more facts will emerge about Kerry?s self-promoted medals and alleged heroism, his malicious slander of other veterans, his common cause with traitors like Jane Fonda, and a Senate voting record designed to weaken our defenses and render us vulnerable to our enemies.

Eventually, Kerry will stand exposed to his fellow Americans as the lightweight, opportunistic, unprincipled fraud that he is - a man who has the effrontery to blow his Vietnam service out of all decent proportion.

While voters are in the process of deciding whether or not Kerry is fit to be their Commander-in-Chief, they would do well to ponder a little-known but important fact. Presidential nominee John F. Kerry is currently being lionized at one of the Vietnamese Communists? most popular museums in Ho Chi Minh City (formerly Saigon).

The War Remnants Museum is the successor to Hanoi?s notorious ?War Crimes Museum? which, during the Vietnam War, displayed ordnance and artifacts allegedly used by American forces against the Communists, as well as photographic exhibits of wartime casualties, some real, some faked. The museum was then?and remains?devoted to blatant anti-American propaganda. According to the Yahoo website?s largely uncritical depiction of this museum?s currently ?haunting and sickening? photographic exhibit, the presentation ?highlights the suffering of the Vietnamese people at the hands of the French and American forces up to 1975.?

In our book ?Aid and Comfort: Jane Fonda in North Vietnam," we wrote about the grisly pictures in the War Crimes Museum attributed to American ?air pirates? bent on allegedly terrorizing ?the peace-loving citizens of Vietnam? - and about how Jane Fonda, ?on virtually her first day in [war-time] Hanoi . . . was taken to the North Vietnam Communists? ?War Crimes? museum?.? Later during her tour, Fonda was to enthuse that every American should visit the museum.

Not many Americans had the opportunity. Some had no choice. Certainly not Everett Alvarez, Jr., who spent nearly nine agonizing years as a POW, and who, as we wrote in ?Aid and Comfort,? was taken in early 1970 to the War Crimes Museum where ?he saw his own helmet and uniform and photographs and equipment of other captured pilots.?


We submit that today John Kerry has a choice of a somewhat different nature. An exhibit in the re-named War Remnants Museum - an institution with the identical goals of its predecessor - is devoted to those anti-war activists whose conduct contributed significantly to helping the North Vietnamese Communists win the Vietnam War. Included in the exhibit - a significant propaganda coup - is a photograph taken in July 1993. It shows presidential nominee John F. Kerry meeting with the General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam. In plain English that even the vacillating Kerry would be hard put to spin, this exhibit in ?liberated? Saigon?s foremost propaganda museum is devoted to American traitors. And there hangs a photograph of a potential President of the United States, who carries a lot of antiwar baggage, meeting with the leader of a totalitarian regime that took nearly sixty thousand American lives.

The continued existence of Kerry?s photograph on the walls of the War Remnants Museum is an affront to many Americans?especially our POWs, who were bombarded with ongoing and relentless propaganda that was its own form of torture. While there is no way for Kerry to force his Vietnamese fans to remove the photograph, he should, for once in his life, take the moral high ground. Paraphrasing President Ronald Reagan, he should say, plainly and forcefully, ?Mr. General Secretary, take down that picture!?

Super Scout hope your son is safe and well, hope he will return home soon to you and family. Thank him for his serviceto our nation for me. I will neither vote for John Kerry or George Bush. I am a member of the American Veterans Party, and will do a write in ballot for our candidate.