Mixed Messages In Two Directions

[HARDCORE]

?The administration is claiming that Iran is sending mixed messages!?

After the miserable handling of the original crisis in Iran (1979), when our Embassy was overrun, the feeling in that nation (Iran), was that the United States was a Paper Tiger!?

?Revolutionary militants invaded the U.S. Embassy in Teheran on 4 November 1979, seized staff members, and precipitated an international crisis (Carter Administration)!?

The head turd of Iran (Ayatollah Khomeini), after the Shah took off with his Billion$, refused all of Carter?s appeals for resolution, and as usual, the ?United Nations was about as effective as a weak fart in a cyclonic whirlwind!!? (Nothing new here!!)

After the recent object lessons in Iraq, however, the Persians (Iranians) began to sing yet another song - ?A FUNERAL MARCH (Their own maybe)!! It must be remembered, however, that Bush's declaration of victory in Iraq, was a bit prematuture, as we are still losing personnel to cowardly back-shooters!!!!

Back during the Iraq/Iran War, in which we backed the Babylonians (Iraq), the Iranians got the stuffing kicked out of them! We in turn (twice), beat the living hell out of the Iraqis! Now it doesn?t take a mastermind for Iran to figure out that they stand no chance should they opt to continue to bark at us again, like a junkyard dog!

With Iran utilizing the ?WMD of the Middle East? (Lies, chest thumping, and pure bull shit), in an attempt to intimidate the United States, they are again tempting fate! The job that should have been completed in 1979 (almost a quarter of a century ago), could (?) again be in the planning stages!? The problem in the United States, however, at least as I see it, is that we take far too much shit from a bunch of un-washed wannabes! ?And this, of course, is often taken as a sign of weakness!?

Am I promoting ?Mr. Bush?s Wars Infinitum Philosophy? or the?UN's Dip-Shit Diplomacy? as a remedy - ?HELL NO!? Neither has worked since we flushed the old League of Nations down the tubes! Besides, both alternatives are nothing more than feeble attempts at blowing smoke to mask other issues, ?Mostly The Ailing Economy!?

If war was utilized as a ?Final Solution?, and we didn?t hand away the spoils in such a rapid fashion, then that would be one thing!! But as I see it, no sooner had President Bush declared victory by landing on the deck of a carrier like some returning Roman General, than we were engaged in another dirty little sniper war! Add to this the fact that Iran, Korea, Yemen, Syria and Libya, etc are all on Mr. Bush?s list of vote getters, and we could be at war for the next decade or better!

Granted (redundantly so), a few international bastards in the Middle East (and elsewhere), along with some pseudo allies, are a ?Real Problem?, but man does not live by war alone! And when any international leader is adept at but saber rattling, lies and promises (no one in particular referenced here), then we (as a nation) may be in big trouble, or engages in eternal conflict!

Hey, did I hear the word ?ECONOMY? rumbling about somewhere!? (One man?s opinion)

VERITAS MMIV