Bush reaffirms first-strike policy, calls Iran biggest possible threat

[David]

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush reaffirmed his strike-first policy against terrorists and enemy nations on Thursday and said Iran may pose the biggest challenge for America.

In a 49-page national security report, the president said diplomacy is the U.S. preference in halting the spread of nuclear and other heinous weapons.

"The president believes that we must remember the clearest lesson of September 11 -- that the United States of America must confront threats before they fully materialize," national security adviser Stephen Hadley said.

"The president's strategy affirms that the doctrine of pre-emption remains sound and must remain an integral part of our national security strategy," Hadley said. "If necessary, the strategy states, under longstanding principles of self defense, we do not rule out the use of force before attacks occur, even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack."

Titled "National Security Strategy," the report summarizes Bush's plan for protecting America and directing U.S. relations with other nations. It is an updated version of a report Bush issued in 2002.

In an earlier report issued a year after the September 11 attacks, Bush underscored his administration's adoption of a pre-emptive policy, marking the end of a deterrent military strategy that dominated the Cold War.

The latest report makes it clear Bush hasn't changed his mind, even though no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq.

"When the consequences of an attack with weapons of mass destruction are potentially so devastating, we cannot afford to stand idly by as grave dangers materialize. ... The place of pre-emption in our national security strategy remains the same," Bush wrote.

The report had harsh words for Iran. It accused the regime of supporting terrorists, threatening Israel and disrupting democratic reform in Iraq. Bush said diplomacy to halt Tehran's suspected nuclear weapons work must prevail to avert a conflict.

"This diplomatic effort must succeed if confrontation is to be avoided," Bush said.

Bush went on to say: "We may face no greater challenge from a single country than from Iran. For almost 20 years, the Iranian regime hid many of its key nuclear efforts from the international community. Yet the regime continues to claim that it does not seek to develop nuclear weapons."

He did not say what would happen if international negotiations with Iran failed. The Bush administration currently is working to persuade Russia and China to support a proposed U.N. Security Council resolution demanding that Iran end its uranium enrichment program. (Full story)

A top Iranian official said Thursday that his country was ready to open direct talks with the United States over Iraq, marking a major shift in Tehran's foreign policy a day after an Iraqi leader called for such talks. Ali Larijani, Iran's top nuclear negotiator and secretary of the country's Supreme National Security Council, told reporters that any talks between the United States and Iran would deal only with Iraqi issues.

But any direct dialogue between Tehran and Washington -- were it to happen -- also could be a beginning for negotiations between the two foes over Iran's suspect nuclear program.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan said the United States was ready to talk with Iran about Iraq. But he also said that any discussions must be restricted to that topic and not include other contentious subjects like Tehran's suspected nuclear weapons program. (Full story)

Tough words for North Korea, Russia and China
Bush also had tough words for North Korea, which he said poses a serious nuclear proliferation challenge, counterfeits U.S. currency, traffics in narcotics, threatens its neighbors and starves its people.

"The North Korean regime needs to change these polices, open up its political system and afford freedom to its people," Bush said. "In the interim, we will continue to take all necessary measures to protect our national and economic security against the adverse effects of their bad conduct."

Bush issued rebukes to Russia and China and called Syria a tyranny that harbors terrorists and sponsors terrorist activity.

On Russia, Bush said recent trends show a waning commitment to democratic freedoms and institutions. "Strengthening our relationship will depend on the policies, foreign and domestic, that Russia adopts," he said.

The United States also is nudging China down a road of reform and openness.

"China's leaders must realize, however, that they cannot stay on this peaceful path while holding on to old ways of thinking and acting that exacerbate concerns throughout the region and the world," Bush wrote.

He said these "old ways" include enlarging China's military in a nontransparent way; expanding trade, yet seeking to direct markets rather than opening them; and supporting energy-rich nations without regard to their misrule or misbehavior.

Bush acknowledges long fight
In 2002, when he sent his first report to Congress, Bush was struggling to persuade U.S. allies to join an offensive to topple Saddam Hussein.

Since then, the oppressive Taliban regime in Afghanistan was replaced by a freely elected government. In Iraq, citizens voted in the nation's first free election, a constitution was passed by referendum and nearly 12 million Iraqis elected a permanent government.

Challenges remain in Iraq, where sectarian violence threatens the fragile government and the U.S. death toll has topped 2,300. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said Iraq's political transition will take a couple of years. Earlier this week, the Pentagon announced it was moving about 700 additional U.S. troops into Iraq from Kuwait because of the escalating killings there and fears that a Shiite holiday would spark even more violence.

"When the Iraqi government, supported by the coalition, defeats the terrorists, terrorism will be dealt a critical blow," Bush said, acknowledging that the fight against terrorism was far from over.

The report is laden with strategies for advancing democracy across the globe, a theme of Bush's second inaugural address.

The president said his administration was advancing this goal by holding high-level meetings at the White House with democratic reformers in repressive nations; using foreign aid to support fair elections, women's rights and religious freedom; and pushing to abolish human trafficking.

Countering suggestions that he favors a go-it-alone approach to foreign policy, Bush emphasized multilateral problem-solving.

"Many of the problems we face -- from the threat of pandemic disease to proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, to terrorism, to human trafficking, to natural disasters -- reach across borders," he said.

"Effective multinational efforts are essential to solve these problems. Yet history has shown that only when we do our part will others do theirs. America must continue to lead."







The National Security Strategy, March 2006 (attached below)

[SuperScout]

Thanks for posting this article. Actually, there should not be a surprise to anyone that the President has not altered his pre-emptive policy, especially in view of the growing threat from both Iran and North Korea, two countries that were mentioned in the 'Axis of Evil' portion of the State of the Union address. Thoughtful people will probably agree that it is inconsistent with sanity, knowing that either of the aforementioned countries wants to deliver any form of harm to this country that we should wait until said harm has been delivered.

The confounded nature of the pundits is that the President can be so unwavering is his defense of America, in spite of the poll numbers which show him at less than 50%. I thank my Lord Almighty that he doesn't govern by polls, but instead evidences the character and integrity of a true leader.

[SparrowHawk62]

Iran a problem, gee I never would have thunk it!
Where was the wake up call on the 444th day?
Damned sure tired of catching up once again after we put the bad guy in his place. Why is it so hard to do the job right in the first place? You screw with the US, we correct the problem with a one time solution by leveling the offending country! The ball less Carter should have called in an air strike the day after operation Eagle Claw failed or maybe when our embassy was under attack.
Now some twenty plus years later we have to deal with the problem all over again. Yeah, Yeah history repeats it's self but it should read: In November of 1979 the US conducted an air strike on the worthless bastards of Iran. The country was left in ruins, it's government in shambles. The US has no intention of sending aid or rebuilding Iran. President Reagan has declared Iran a permanent enemy of the US, an non citizen who claims to be from Iran will be sent back to the country and his assets in the US seized to help off set the cost of sending the Iranian's home.

[Seascamp]

WASHINGTON -- Michael A. Ledeen, a former consultant to the National Security Council and to the U.S. State and Defense Departments delivered scathing testimony on Iran to the House Committee on International Relations this week, citing his fear "that the obsession with the nuclear question often obscures the central policy issue: That the Islamic Republic has waged war against us for many years and is killing Americans every week."
The author of the book, "The War Against the Terror Masters," held little back from the lawmakers with such polemics as, "They want us dominated or dead. There is no escape from their hatred, or from the war they have waged against us. We can either win or lose, but no combination of diplomatic demarches, economic sanctions, and earnest negotiations, can change that fatal equation. They will either defeat us, or perish."
The former commissioner of the U.S.-China Commission warned the lawmakers that in his opinion the terror war in Iraq is a replay of the strategy that the Iranians and the Syrians used in the 1980s to drive the United States and its French allies out of Lebanon: "Those Americans who believed it was possible to wage the war against terrorism one country at a time, and that we could therefore achieve a relatively peaceful transition from Saddam's dictatorship to an elected democracy, did not listen to the many public statements from Tehran and its sister city in jihad, Damascus, announcing in advance that Iraq was about to become the ?new Lebanon.'"
The expert outlined a worst-case scenario that he suggested might unfold once Iran managed to put nuclear warheads on their intermediate range missiles
"They might even be able to direct them against American territory from one or more of the Latin American countries with which the mullahs are establishing strategic alliances.
"The mullahs make no secret of their strategy; just a couple of weeks ago, when the leader of Hamas was received in honor in Tehran, a photograph of the event was released, in which there was a colorful poster of President Ahmadi-Nezhad and Supreme Leader Khamenei along with Castro, Morales and Chavez.
"The mullahs would be pleased to nuke Israel, and they would be thrilled to kill millions of Americans."
The author noted that from the first hours of the fanatical regime of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979, "Iran declared war on us in language it seems impossible to misunderstand."
He reminded the lawmakers of the recent statement by Hassan Abassi, the chief strategic adviser to President Ahmadi-Nezhad ? "America means enemy, and enemy means Satan."


Scamp

[39mto39g]

Is just for the Democrats (in my opinion) . The rest of the country already understands that he has said this and that is the way it will be. He doesn't have to tell me 15 times every day about the war in Iraq and why we are there.
Its for people like this reporter and its newspaper (Washington AP) that incert there own little digs in what President Bush says like,
"The latest report makes it clear Bush hasn't changed his mind, even though no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq."
Non were found so therefore he never had them? or were aren't very good finders?
The United States has far to much"compassion" for the rest of the world.
We get accused of being the bad people all the time (while they are cutting off heads) maybe its time to be a little BAD.
What are they going to do, anyway, besides beat on there chest.
I say we print a bunch of pictures of Mahonid and drop them over Iran, maybe with Jesus kicking him in the nuts.
Ron

Srew it, nuke em till they glow.