![]() |
|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Ten Nobel Prize-winning economists today published a letter endorsing John Kerry for president. In their letter, the Nobel laureates draw the sharp contrast between George Bush's disastrous economic policies and the sound economics of the Kerry-Edwards economic plan.
********** An Open Letter to the American Public August 25, 2004 President Bush and his administration have embarked on a reckless and extreme course that endangers the long-term economic health of our nation. John Kerry understands that sound economic policy requires a substantial change in direction, and we support him for President. The differences between President Bush and John Kerry with respect to leadership on the economy are wider than in any other Presidential election in our experience. President Bush believes that tax cuts benefiting the most-wealthy Americans are the answer to almost every economic problem. The Bush Administration?s tax cuts were poorly designed and therefore have given insufficient stimulus to job creation. The principal effect of the Bush Administration?s fiscal policies has been to turn budget surpluses into enormous budget deficits. President Bush?s fiscal irresponsibility threatens the long-term economic security and prosperity of our nation. At a time when our nation should be saving for the future, to pay the Medicare and Social Security benefits for the baby boomers, our national debt is swelling; the social contract that binds one generation to another is being threatened with unraveling. Increased borrowing from abroad?now almost five percent of our GDP?leaves our country, our economy and global stability increasingly vulnerable to changes in sentiments of foreign, or even domestic, investors. At the same time, his policies have exacerbated income inequality, failed to address the real wage declines and rising health care costs beleaguering American families, and ignored the need for critical investments to spur long-term growth. John Kerry will chart a different course. We believe that he will restore fiscal responsibility. He is committed to making key investments in human capital, such as helping families meet the cost of higher education. He has a proposal that will address the problem of rising health care costs. We believe that he has both the ability and the commitment to work with our allies and trading partners to promote global growth that lifts up workers around the world. John Kerry is our choice for America?s next President. We hope that you will join us. Signed by the following recipients of the Nobel Prize in Economics: George A. Akerlof University of California at Berkeley 2001 Kenneth J. Arrow Stanford University 1972 Daniel Kahneman Princeton University 2002 Lawrence R. Klein University of Pennsylvania 1980 Daniel L. McFadden University of California at Berkeley 2000 Douglass C. North Washington University St. Louis 1993 Paul A. Samuelson MIT 1970 William F. Sharpe Stanford University 1990 Robert M. Solow MIT 1987 Joseph E. Stiglitz Columbia University 2001 The views expressed in this letter represent those of the signers acting as individual citizens. They do not necessarily represent the views of the institutions with which they are affiliated.
__________________
![]() Gimpy "MUD GRUNT/RIVERINE" "I ain't no fortunate son"--CCR "We have shared the incommunicable experience of war..........We have felt - we still feel - the passion of life to its top.........In our youth our hearts were touched with fire" Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. |
Sponsored Links |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Sure Gimpy........every one of them is an "Ultra-Liberal" Democrat (read SOCIALIST).
I'm surprised that nobody from Swarthmore has endorsed him......around these parts we call that place the "Little Red Schoolhouse". |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Can't argue with Nobel prize-winning economists or even First Grade Math Teachers, in that Socialism and/or where The Taxpayers are taxed out-of-their-socks AS THE STATE NEEDS,...always works best FOR THE STATE.
Fortunately here in America we have sort-of-a: "Checks and Balances" to stop Democrats and/or foreign type socialistic politicians from taking over TOTALLY. Believe that such in large part is due to the LESS lordly and LESS pompously self righteous: "Party of Lincoln" and/or Republican Party and Republican Administrations, Republican Senators and Republican Congressmen. Besides, and since Conservative/Republican/Right-Wingers believe that The American Taxpayer should KEEP more of their hard earned money and give LESS to government,...only Private Sector Middle Class Fools (re. those not: "Connected" or beholding to Democrat Party in any way) would think of voting against their very own best interests, safety and security and/or voting for The Dem/Lib/Socialist/Leftist Party. Government (Local, State, Federal) Workers and/or The Public Sector Employees? Well,...that's another story. Some vote their bread and butter, and some just vote obediently as told. Neil |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Conservatives Endorse The Fuhrer Principle: Our Leader ?ber alles | urbsdad6 | Political Debate | 0 | 02-18-2006 01:17 AM |
Darwin Award Winners: | Jerry D | General Posts | 0 | 12-12-2005 05:53 PM |
Oprah, nobel peace prize? | melody1181 | General Posts | 7 | 07-08-2005 01:29 PM |
Massed Darwin Award Winners | revwardoc | General Posts | 1 | 05-08-2005 11:39 AM |
Medal of Honor Winners Dies | usmcsgt65 | Marines | 0 | 05-02-2002 05:13 PM |
|