The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > International > NATO

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2019, 09:14 AM
Boats's Avatar
Boats Boats is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 12,613
Arrow It’s Time for a NATO-China Council

It’s Time for a NATO-China Council
By: Barry Pavel - Defense One 8-21-19
RE: https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/201...ouncil/159326/

Photo link: https://cdn.defenseone.com/media/img...ense-large.jpg

Such a group would help to collectively engage Beijing, which prefers to deal with countries in isolation.

On a recent visit to Australia, NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg said that China is a growing concern for NATO not because NATO wants to go to the Pacific but because China is coming to Europe. He is right. The Alliance should establish a “NATO-China Council,” a structural mechanism for dialogue with China to increase transparency and mutual understanding, raise concerns, avoid miscalculations and foster, where possible, cooperation. Here’s why.

The striking growth in Chinese activities in and around Europe over the last two years has propelled the Asian giant to the top of U.S. and European security officials’ agendas. Such activities include Huawei’s efforts to increase its share of European and North American digital infrastructure; predatory economic activity as part of its globe-spanning Belt and Road Initiative, which includes Europe and its environs; massive cyber espionage and theft of Western intellectual property; increasing activity in Arctic areas, including those adjacent to NATO borders; joint exercises with the Russian military, not just in the Pacific and Central Asia but also in the Nordic-Baltic region; increasing ownership of major European seaports (e.g., Trieste) and investment in maritime facilities critical to NATO and the U.S. Navy (e.g., Naples); and much more.

For these and other reasons, the European Commission named China a “systemic rival” in an important policy document earlier this year. In short, Europe and the United States have woken up to the growing, global, multi-dimensional Chinese political, economic, technological, and security challenge. Now they are working together to find the best way to manage it.

NATO needs to do its part to dissuade Beijing from undermining the security of Europe and North America and to shape a more cooperative and constructive relationship between China and the West. Seventeen years ago, the alliance established a NATO-Russia Council for similar purposes. It’s time to propose a NATO-China Council. The advantages would be many.

First, a Council would recognize and respond to the growing reality of Chinese influence and reach into and around Europe and beyond, and to the implications of these actions for Euro-Atlantic security interests, including the sustainment of a global rules-based international order.

The Council would spur the alliance to more seriously address China’s growing threats to NATO interests in Europe, in the Arctic, and, yes, in the Asia-Pacific. The most effective strategy by the West to engage China and to counter Chinese aggression will involve transatlantic collaboration, not just in the political and economic realms but also in the military domain. There is no better institution to promote the latter than NATO.

Further, the Council also would let China know that its actions risk the ire of the West as a whole. While Beijing prefers to deal with other countries one at a time, the NATO-China Council would align all 29 alliance members in a dialogue with China. It would make clear to China that the growing “great-power competition” is not a contest between the United States and China, but one that involves the U.S. and its NATO allies all aligned together, bound by common values, interests, and history.

The new council also would reinforce NATO’s deterrence of Russian coercion by making clear to Moscow that China’s growing global power will marginalize Russian interests and relevance.

A NATO-China Council need not be driven solely by a confrontational relationship between the Euro-Atlantic community and Beijing. It can be a step a toward a deeper and more cooperative relationship, just as the NATO-Ukraine and NATO-Georgia Commissions have fostered closer partnerships.

When NATO makes this proposal, China will initially demur. But over time, Beijing will increase its engagement, realizing that having open communications with the world’s most powerful military alliance will be an important means for avoiding conflict and crisis in the decades to come.

About the writer(s):
Barry Pavel is vice president and director of the Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security at the Atlantic Council. From 2008-10 he was special assistant to the president and senior director for defense policy and strategy on the National Security Council staff. Pavel has served as chief.
&
Ian Brzezinski is a Senior Fellow in the Scowcroft Center for Strategy & Security at the Atlantic Council and a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Europe and NATO policy.
__________________
Boats

O Almighty Lord God, who neither slumberest nor sleepest; Protect and assist, we beseech thee, all those who at home or abroad, by land, by sea, or in the air, are serving this country, that they, being armed with thy defence, may be preserved evermore in all perils; and being filled with wisdom and girded with strength, may do their duty to thy honour and glory; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

"IN GOD WE TRUST"
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.