The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Veterans > Veterans Benefits

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2008, 08:34 PM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
Administrator
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 46,798
Distinctions
Special Projects VOM Staff Contributor 
Default Senators warn against cutting veterans' healthcare

HEARST NEWSPAPERS


WASHINGTON -- Democratic senators on Wednesday warned that a Bush administration proposal to cut VA medical center construction funding and boost prescription drug co-payments would be devastating to former service members.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said the proposals -- part of the Bush administration's budget request for fiscal 2009 -- "would close the VA's door to thousands of our nation's veterans."

Murray's comments came during a hearing of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, which was reviewing President Bush's requested budget.

Bush has asked Congress to spend $93.7 billion on veterans -- $3.4 billion more than the current fiscal year. The extra money includes higher spending on the health care of veterans returning from war in Iraq and Afghanistan. The VA anticipates treating 333,000 veterans from the current conflicts in fiscal 2009 -- 40,000 more than expected this year.

Bush would pay for some of the increase by slashing in half the spending on VA construction projects -- from $1.1 billion this year to $587 million in fiscal 2009.

At least two projects at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System in the Seattle area would lose funding under Bush's plan -- a $43 million project to make a nursing building meet current seismic standards and the construction of a mental health services building, which carries a pricetag of $178 million.

Bush also has proposed new enrollment fees of up to $750 for some veterans and increasing co-payments for prescription drugs for higher-income veterans who were not disabled as part of their military service. Under the president's proposal, those co-payments would jump from $8 to $15.

The administration sought similar new fees last year, but Congress rejected the idea.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, predicted lawmakers would once again refuse to hike the co-payments.

"Year after year, Congress throws this in the garbage can where it should belong," Sanders said.

Murray, the panel's third-ranking Democrat, said the fees would "discourage many veterans from accessing the VA -- even as our veterans are turning to the VA in larger numbers than ever before."

Newly installed Veterans Affairs Secretary James Peake defended the administration's proposal, saying that money for treatment of veterans would be twice as high as when Bush took office seven years ago.

The VA has sought new fees for some higher-income veterans without service-related disabilities so it can continue to focus first on treating former service members who were injured in the military, Peake said.

"Our priority, I think, is appropriately those with (service related injuries) or a severe economic need," Peake said.

Murray said the construction projects slated for cutbacks are important to modernize decades-old VA buildings. On average, VA buildings are 57 years old.

"A lot of very serious upgrades . . . are needed," Murray said.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Longer Waits For Va Healthcare Gimpy General Posts 1 03-21-2006 11:29 AM
Va Healthcare Outscores Private Sector Gimpy General Posts 16 01-30-2006 09:25 AM
How Senators Voted On Veterans Health Care Funding HARDCORE General Posts 3 08-08-2004 08:40 PM
VA healthcare cuts deltamedic General Posts 5 03-24-2003 06:59 PM
Cutting Through All Of The Crap HARDCORE General Posts 0 10-31-2002 06:50 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.